Let's talk about the author, before coming to the charging head network, I think that 18W fast charging has been very good, after coming to know that 18W is only entry-level..., before it was also because the original charger of the mobile phone was too expensive (just went to apple's official website to check it, 5W charger also sold 145 yuan you dare to believe? ), and had to go to other platforms to pick up leaks, a treasure idle fish have been shopping, see a treasure of those outrageous renderings do not know the true or false, and later did not dare to buy, after all, because a fake charger to charge the phone is too worthless, but later learned that relatives around have helped to step through the pit.
Since coming to the charging head network, professional skills have skyrocketed, and I have only smiled at the super cool renderings of a treasure. However, I believe that there are still many users who are constantly stepping on the pit, so today the author has planned this issue of content to uncover the true face of some so-called "fast charge".
Say it in front
With a curious idea, I began to look for a treasure, multi-mouth, full protocol, super fast charge, high power, what keyword cow X searched for, so I searched out a lot of demons and ghosts.
Click into the product details of the introduction, the introduction of the regular charger is like this, the charger input, output and other information will be listed very clearly.
Ran goose... Some of the interfaces of "multi-port high-power super full-protocol fast charger" are like this..., and I can't find a parameter to search for.
Product introduction
Therefore, in the end, I ordered these 3 sets, and friends who pay attention to the charging head network believe that at present, OPPO, vivo, and Huawei's high-power fast charging need to specify fast charging packages, and the third party is rare or almost non-existent. Therefore, this time we purchased "Huawei 66W Charger", "iQOO 120W Charger" and "OPPO 65W Charger". Below, for the sake of convenience, the charger will be described in a false word.
Huawei charger (purchase price: 28 blocks 5 sets)
Let's take a look at Huawei first, the price of the purchased set is 28 yuan 5, and the original Huawei 66W set is priced at 199 yuan.
The packaging box of the fake Huawei 66W charger is very simple, directly outlining the appearance of a charger, and the words of the super fast charger are included in the upper left corner.
True and false Huawei 66W charger comparison, the left side is false, the right side is the positive owner.
On the interface panel, you can see the difference at once, left false right true.
Take a closer look inside the interfaces of the two chargers.
The parameters of the two chargers are compared, the left side is false, and the right side is true. From the printed font, you can see the difference, the fake charger output gear is even more than the real one, of course, it is only on the paper.
The net weight of the True Huawei 66W charger is about 90.6g.
The net weight of the fake Huawei 66W charger is about 69.4g, and the weight here is suddenly exposed.
Let's take a look at the matching data line, left true right false.
USB-A internal comparison, left true right false, the real internal contact width is obviously wider.
USB-C close-up, left true right fake.
Use the macro lens to look at the inside of the USB-C interface, it is completely two types, left true and right false.
Using ChargeLAB's POWER-Z KT002 to read the fake Huawei 66W charger's fast charging protocol, yo-oh, the protocol support is still "comprehensive enough". Really here we won't test.
Direct test charge bar, this is really Huawei 66W set for Huawei Mate40 Pro charging, power 55.73W, trigger 66W SCP fast charge.
This is the charging UI display of the phone when charging the Huawei Mate40 Pro with the original 66W charger.
Looking at the fake Huawei 66W charging set, you can see the animation of super fast charging after charging, but the words "Max 66W" are missing.
And the power... 5V3A, strictly speaking, is also fast charged, but it is too inferior compared to the original head.
OPPO charger (purchase price: 46 yuan)
After watching Huawei's look at OPPO, the oppo 65W set purchased this time is priced at 46 yuan, and the price of the original 65W charger is 149 yuan per head.
Just look at the product packaging of Taolai.
True and false contrast, the left side is true, the right side is false.
Parameter comparison, true on the left and false on the right.
Interface comparison, up and down false.
The net weight of the true OPPO 65W charger is about 94.9g.
The net weight of the fake OPPO 65W charger is about 87.8g, the weight difference is not much, is it inside to do counterweight plus iron block?
Directly read the protocol of the fake 65W charger, which supports Apple 2.4A, QC, and VOOC fast charging protocol.
In terms of supporting wires, the left is true and the right is false.
USB-A internal close-up, left true right fake, suddenly there is a kind of drama to do enough to catch the foot...
The interior of the USB-C interface suddenly saw the difference, left true and right false.
In the charging test session, the OPPO Reno 6 Pro was charged with an original OPPO 65W charger with a power of 54.57W.
Charging the OPPO Reno 6 Pro with a fake OPPO 65W charger at 19.99W, the power test was immediately very clear.
iQOO (Purchase price: 130 RMB)
Finally, let's look at the iQOO side, which is also the most expensive charger purchased this time, costing 130 yuan. The official genuine price is currently down 40 yuan and is priced at 259 yuan.
According to the custom, take out the genuine product and look at it, left true and right false.
Interface position, left true right false, false connection port position are too lazy to imitate.
The internal details of the interface are compared, the left side is really wide on the inside and the two sides of the contact, and there is also a contact on the outside for handshake 120W flash charge communication. The fake one on the right has nothing.
Parameter comparison, left true right false, the real font is obviously clearer.
In terms of protocols, the power-Z KT002 of The RogueLAB was used to read the fast charging protocol of the fake iQOO 120W charger and measured to support the QC fast charging protocol.
120W fast charging line comparison, left true right fake.
USB-A internal comparison, the above is true, you can see the two sides of the contacts widened, the inside with an additional contact for 120W fast charging communication. The fake model has no special contacts, and although the sides are widened, they are not as wide as the original.
This is the data used to charge the iQOO phone using the original 120W charger, and the power received by the mobile phone is 103.6W.
And you can trigger flashcharge animations.
The fake head can also trigger flashCharge's fast charging animation, but it is significantly different from the 120W fast charging animation in the above figure.
And actually use the POWER-Z's latest KM002C tester to see, 23.67W, almost one-fifth of the original fast charge power.
Charging head net summary
The test is over, and everyone believes that the results have been counted.
Here the charging data has been listed in the price comparison, the price of the charger that came to the tao is mostly half of the original price, or even only a fraction, the actual experience of fast charging gap is very large.
At present, the fast charging of mobile phones on the Android side has been developed for a long time, but some high-power fast charging still needs to use the original charger. The original fast charging experience is very good, but often the price is more expensive, in fact, for some small white users, or the original Dafa is good, it is as a matter of spending money to buy a rest assured. If more users who pay attention to this aspect feel that the original is too expensive, then the third party still has to choose a reliable channel, after all, if the mobile phone is broken because of a charger, it is to pick up sesame seeds and lose watermelon.