laitimes

【Case Interpretation】Interpretation of the 22nd round of the Chinese Super League Tianjin vs Cangzhou, Dalian vs Qingdao match controversy penalty interpretation

2021 season of the Chinese Super League still has four games left in the championship group, in yesterday's first relegation group game can be described as a joy and sorrow, Dalian people in the last round of the face has long been determined to play the Chinese Super League promotion and relegation play-off Qingdao team, the initiative of the Dalian people in this game is no longer in their own hands, want to directly relegate the premise is to win the Qingdao team, but also hope that Chongqing and Tianjin can not defeat the opponent, although Dalian people 4:1 victory over Qingdao, but helpless Chongqing and Tianjin have defeated their opponents, Dalian had to play in the Chinese Super League promotion and relegation play-offs.

Tianjin Jinmen Tigers against Cangzhou Lions, until the 85th minute of the game, Xie Weijun scored a goal, thrilling relegation success, but this ball Cangzhou Lions players signaled tianjin players to score before handball, let's first see if Tianjin team's precious goal is handball foul first.

【Case Interpretation】Interpretation of the 22nd round of the Chinese Super League Tianjin vs Cangzhou, Dalian vs Qingdao match controversy penalty interpretation
【Case Interpretation】Interpretation of the 22nd round of the Chinese Super League Tianjin vs Cangzhou, Dalian vs Qingdao match controversy penalty interpretation

Magno's shot hit the upright and bounced back onto the field, and Xie Weijun scored a shot at the goal. But the Cangzhou players complained that Magno shot first handball, let's take a look:

【Case Interpretation】Interpretation of the 22nd round of the Chinese Super League Tianjin vs Cangzhou, Dalian vs Qingdao match controversy penalty interpretation

And the key is here, we really can't see from this shot whether it touches Magno's arm, if VAR can see clearly here, we think it's unnatural expansion, should blow handball fouls, but here it seems not to be touched, the player complains about the following:

【Case Interpretation】Interpretation of the 22nd round of the Chinese Super League Tianjin vs Cangzhou, Dalian vs Qingdao match controversy penalty interpretation

In fact, from the video replay, both sides have handball, but the arms are in the normal position of the movement of competing for the ball, so it is not a handball foul for both sides, but if the attacking handball is even if it is an unintentional direct shot to score, it should be invalidated and the handball foul is awarded. However, Magno's shot did not enter the goal but hit the upright to indirectly assist the teammate's score, and in the latest rules, the player unintentionally assists the teammate to score the handball and no longer blows the handball foul, so it is correct that the ball is invalid!

【Case Interpretation】Interpretation of the 22nd round of the Chinese Super League Tianjin vs Cangzhou, Dalian vs Qingdao match controversy penalty interpretation

Zhao Yingjie and the opposing team members collided with each other in the process of competing with each other for the ball, both sides were competing for the ball, and the other party also had obvious turning around and closing the legs, but due to inertia, both sides could not contain their bodies and collided together, and the referee was right not to blow the foul!

Finally, a digression, there are always netizens private messages ask us, are you not reporting that Tang Shunqi has become an international referee, why he has not worn the international badge in 2022, why not wear the simplest is that the new badge of FIFA has not been sent to their hands, not only him, referees in other countries have not received it so far, and the referees of the five major leagues are still wearing the badge of 2021.

After watching this game, let's look at the Dalian people's victory over Qingdao team, Qingdao, who has played the Chinese Super League promotion and relegation play-off in advance, can be said to have no desire for this round, and the red card in this game was also awarded a penalty. Let's look at these two key penalties, first look at the red card:

【Case Interpretation】Interpretation of the 22nd round of the Chinese Super League Tianjin vs Cangzhou, Dalian vs Qingdao match controversy penalty interpretation

This action of Qingdao team Yang Yu is under the eyes of the referee, the referee sees it clearly, Yang Yu's tackle directly kicks the opponent's calf, which must be ordered to appear with a serious foul penalty. The referee's direct red card decision was very correct!

【Case Interpretation】Interpretation of the 22nd round of the Chinese Super League Tianjin vs Cangzhou, Dalian vs Qingdao match controversy penalty interpretation

This handball is obvious, the key point is that the ball is not supported by the player on the ground, because the new rules when the player falls to the ground in order to support the body, and there is no horizontal or vertical extension, the handball foul will not be awarded. First of all, let's see that this action is not necessary for physical movement, this technical action itself is unreasonable, so the arm is not for a reasonable technical action and support, simply put, this technical action is not reasonable for him to intercept the ball with his foot. It is the arm deliberately wanting to move the ball, should blow the penalty deliberate handball, we think the referee is right to blow the penalty handball foul!

【Case Interpretation】Interpretation of the 22nd round of the Chinese Super League Tianjin vs Cangzhou, Dalian vs Qingdao match controversy penalty interpretation

Click Share

Click Favorites

Thumbs up

Read on