Recently, a lot of things have happened, I believe that if everyone pays attention to the Internet, they should have heard about it. In fact, some people's remarks are very strange, and the logic is even more bizarre. Many of these routines have to be reminiscent of the "god" film released in 2010 - "Let the Bullets Fly".
To be honest, the first time I watched this movie at that time, it was when I went to see it as a pure comedy, wonderful lines, smooth editing, plus super-god acting skills, and an enjoyable plot, and it was very cool to watch it. But back to what this movie actually said, in fact, it could not be said at the time, so the interpretation of the meaning of "Let the Bullets Fly" at that time was also a very hot thing on the Internet.
However, more than 10 years have passed, "Let the Bullets Fly" almost does not need all kinds of speculation or interpretation, many of the plots in it may not be deliberately done by Jiang Wen, but it does fit with some of the situations we encounter in real life, which is very interesting.
If nothing else, the name "Let the Bullets Fly" alone is well worth mentioning.
In the past two years, we have seen a lot of "small essays" on the Internet, when the public mood is provoked to the climax of small essays - suddenly, reversed. This kind of thing is not once or twice, so the more mature netizens now know that before expressing their opinions, they must "let the bullets fly for a while". If you see that the "small composition" will still be gushing in the blood, then you really have to be calm and calm, otherwise once it is reversed, you can hit your own face again.
And it's even more interesting to talk about a lot of the plots in the Let the Bullets Fly movie.
When I watched the movie for the first time, I thought that it was bloody and stupid for Rokuko to draw the knife on his stomach. But when we look at it in combination with reality, is there less such a thing as one bowl of powder or two bowls of powder?
What some people care about is really not a bowl of powder, two bowls of powder, they only care about you pulling the knife from your stomach, the knife is cut, the person is scattered, you die; the knife is not cut, people are gathered, they catch you and ask how many bowls of powder are there? You don't die, but at least you have to die.
This does not require me to give specific examples, you can contact the network incidents encountered by yourself, and there is more than one.
Then there are more classic, "make money, business, not chill", in fact, this is also a very common stem. For example, some film and television dramas, obviously they are confused with understanding, but there are always people who selectively blindly boast into a flower, and the cake is not fragrant with a little. But "make money, business, not chilling", how about two sentences?
However, I think it is also necessary to combine Jiang Wen's next sentence to see: "Han Bei, very TM Han Bei", because some money is business, do not earn white, but some money is really not earned.
To be fair, some kind of channel of dollars, yen or Western "certification brand", is this thing so easy to get? If you take it, you have to stab your own compatriots, and this money or brand will earn it. What is the difference between handing a knife to a foreigner or stabbing a knife at one's own compatriots and the puppet army, traitors, and two devils during the War of Resistance?
I remember when I wrote about the phenomenon of puppet armies during the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression, readers always asked: Why were there millions of puppet armies and traitors at that time?
In fact, if you look at the people who whitewash the Japanese devils now, you will know that those who can whitewash the invaders can be good things. Look at the guys who are in a hurry to be flattering, but look down on their compatriots, eager to change the skin and then hand people knives. And these people at least understand Chinese, and there is really a set of anti-string with play.
Speaking of this, I have to say that "Let the Bullets Fly" has another wonderful plot: Zhang Mazi wants to send out the silver, so what kind of trick did Huang Shilang come up with?
Today, I want you to dress up as bandits, exactly like them, and how they send, you will grab and mess with them!
Translator: What is dressed as a bandit? What is exactly the same? What is it to mess with them?
Let's combine some things on the Internet now, is this set of roads familiar with?
After a vicious event occurs, everyone gets up and refutes it, and then the other party can't sit still (or maybe even deliberately). Now the usual routine is to play "anti-string black", engage in expansion, and then shift the focus, use the antagonism provoked by the expansion to create new contradictions, and then they jump left and right in front of the new contradictions, continue to provoke confrontation, and then tear society apart, and lower the definition of malignant events.
After this set of combined punches, the nature and focus of the original vicious event have been shifted, and not only has this focus shifted, but the new contradictions after the expansion have become more and more intense.
And one vicious event is so operated, the next is also, and the next is still, this group of disguised bandits can even be transformed into various roles in it, using a set of words to divert the focus and create contradictions, which can set off a counterattack again and again.
After more such incidents, the public will feel that they are a little too sensitive and have been put on the line? Is it really a glass heart?
In fact, it is not at all, because you do not react to the act of kicking your nose in the face, and the bottom line is constantly lowering, which is exactly what makes the family achieve its greatest purpose: to dissolve your national self-confidence and guide your thoughts and values.
You can imagine such a scene: people are scolding you explicitly or implicitly, you are still warning yourself, others have no meaning, you can't be sensitive, you have to accept all this "confidently", and you have to comfort yourself that others have no malice.
If you look at it from a third perspective, isn't it that someone else has already led your mind to go?
Ironically, some people have now been led away.
For example, some historical facts, as well as Japan's ghost toilets, or the insults often played by the West, have a consensus and bottom line that does not need to be discussed much in the past.
However, we have seen on the recent network that these are still room for discussion, and some people even say that the bottom line can be flexibly loosened, since the bottom line can be loosened at will, is this still called the bottom line?
It cannot be said that these people who are led away are bad people, there are not so many bad people, but it is true that these friends have made mistakes and fallen into the trap of others. When you are led by their words and lose the normal bottom line, you basically lose the ability to distinguish between right and wrong. If you are like this, I am like this, and he is like this, then it is Huang Silang who laughs to the end.
Therefore, we must at least maintain the ability to distinguish between right and wrong and the basic bottom line, and we must also have a clear understanding of those "anti-string blacks" and their transfer and provocation techniques. I really feel that it is not good to do, go to see "Let the Bullets Fly" to experience, but don't substitute for Huang Silang's side.