Ito attributed the loss of the World Table Tennis Championships to the fact that the table eats the ball, the floor is slippery, and the ball is too soft and light, and this reason is not valid. The venue and the competition equipment are fair to everyone, is it true that in order to win the game, Ito also has to carry the glue and the table all over the world?

The Japan Table Tennis Association did something on the Tokyo Olympic venue, why didn't Ito reveal it himself?
The logic of Ito's current loss is that as long as it is not a factor in her favor, it can be called an obstacle. Japan hosts the Tokyo Olympic Games, all the equipment is provided by the Japanese side, and Ito is not "double killed" in the women's singles and women's team? So what did the national table tennis say?
1. The Olympic venue was actually reduced to meet the characteristics of Japanese athletes. To win, you must win the honor, and to lose is to lose with integrity. The Japanese women's table tennis has just announced Ishikawa Yoshinori as the captain, and compared with Ishikawa's atmospheric humility, Ito is indeed too calculating. For the edge ball, Ishikawa can take the initiative to point it out, but Ito has to install Hawkeye. The Japanese are familiar with the way of playing national table tennis, that is, the holding ability of the Middle and Far Stage is very strong, while the Japanese male and female players are short in stature and can only play on the near stage. Therefore, in a competition like the Tokyo Olympics, Japan did not arrange the venue according to the standards of the International Table Tennis Federation!
After the field is reduced, the movement of running and hitting the ball in a wide range like Xu Xin is affected. Liu Guoliang once proposed to the International Table Tennis League that the venue did not meet the requirements, and the answer given by the Japanese side was that the broadcast cable had been laid under the venue and could not be changed. It is in such a venue that the national table tennis also won 4 of the 5 Olympic gold medals. For such a dirty approach, I don't know what Ito Mimako has to say?
The loss must be technically to find the reason, if Ito Mimachi is not convinced, the national table tennis can only hit her heart convinced.
At the 2016 Rio Olympics, the men's team final Mizutani Falcon defeated Xu Xin. After taking Xu Xin, Mizutani Falcon shouted at Liu Guoliang and Ma Longzhen, who were sitting on the sidelines. Liu Guoliang said only one word to the players: Don't let them live!
1. The last straw that crushed Ito, she knew best in her own heart. Ai Fukuhara and Ishikawa Yoshinori have also gone through a process from being beaten to crying, then being beaten to being served, and then changing into respect for the strong strength of national table tennis. Ito Mimachi called the board national table tennis before, she does have this heart and ability, after all, she has defeated all the main players of the national table tennis women's team except Chen Meng. However, with the study of Ito by the national table tennis, Ito Mimako has fallen into the situation of "invincible in every situation", why do you always go to the retreat? If she still maintains the threat to the national table tennis, does she still need to retreat?
What Ito can take out in front of the national table tennis, they are almost taken, and the changes in raw glue cannot be infinite, and in the end, they still hold the strength. Ito knows very well in her heart that she has been thoroughly touched by the national table tennis, and now she can only be a dead duck with a hard mouth, picking the field and picking the ball. At the Tokyo Olympics, Ito was defeated at his home field, so where to put the venue, Ito felt that it was no problem and fair?
What do you think of Ito's belief that losing the World Table Tennis Championships is not a venue, and the ball used in the game is not good? Welcome to leave a message, discuss, thank you for your attention! I am a teenager at the Temple of Horse riding.