Cui Jian:
Concepts and Categories in the Theoretical System of "Perception Theory": Consciousness I Read The Theory of Perception Series Of Articles No. 20 (7)
So, combing through it carefully, what in existence is big enough to hold everything? Not only can it contain mountains, rivers, earth, the sun, moon, stars, and the space-time universe, but it can also contain the above five ideologies, and treat everything in existence, whether material or conscious, as cognitive objects? Moreover, this subject does not look at and recognize all existences in existence mechanically and separately, but integrates all existence into a unified system of rules and logic, and treats them as an organically unified, universally connected, integrated, and dynamicly changing integral existence. More importantly, this subject is not only able to see this integral existence from the perspective of one movement, but also stipulates the rules and logic of its one-piece movement, that is, this subject also creates and regulates this integral existence.
There is only one person who can assume this task, and that is the "perceptual consciousness ontology."
Where is the "perceptual consciousness ontology"? This is the materialist question, and the premise of this question is that the premise of this question is based on the self, where is the ontology of perceptual consciousness? There is no answer along this line of thought, because logically, ontology is everywhere, and everything in existence is in ontology. So, the question should be asked, what is my relationship with the ontology?
I am the perceptual fact presented in the "ontology of perceptual consciousness", which includes the so-called my body, the behavioral characteristics of my body, the interaction between me and the surrounding environment, the life characteristics and functions of all the cells and tissues in my body, and the rules and logic they reflect, the inductive subconscious, instinctive consciousness, spiritual consciousness, reflective consciousness, and all other phenomena, attributes, and behaviors related to me. All of this is a fact presented in the perceptual consciousness, if not, how do we know that these facts exist? That is to say, without this subject of perceptual consciousness, all this will not exist, and they will not exist at all without this subject. Or conversely, since we have this set of complex and systematic existences with the self as the core, and we can clearly perceive this set of existences, there must be a subject opposite to it, and this subject is the "perceptual consciousness ontology." This is in line with the basic logical premise that "existence must exist relative to the subject, and existence without a subject cannot exist". It's just that we are so attached to the spiritual consciousness based on the information of the flesh senses that we cannot realize the existence of the "perceptual consciousness ontology", in fact, we have not left the ontology for a moment, we are connected to the ontology.
We believe too much in our spiritual consciousness, and the scientifically worshipped intellectual elite believes that consciousness is produced by our brains, and that no matter how complex the forms of consciousness, they are the miracles of the most complex human brains. In fact, the brain nerve cells are complex, they are also physical, since they are physical, they can only produce physical phenomena and functions, the brain receives electrical signals from the senses, after processing by the brain center, the synthesis can still only be electrical signals, but comprehensive complex signals, these signals can only form the material basis of consciousness, complete consciousness, is these material basis plus the complex set of human ideas, is the infinite wonderful world presented in our consciousness.
Where did these ideas come from? We can't prove in any way that they come from our brains, and even though modern neuroscience of the brain has accomplished a lot, it can't prove it, because it's not a fact in the first place, how can it be proven? A simple counter-proof can show that the idea is not generated by the brain: the idea expresses the nature of existence and the state of existence of the world, and the nature of the world and the state of existence have existed for billions of years before the human brain was produced, so it can be said that there is no idea, the human brain and the pig brain are one level, and there is no brain, but the idea still exists. Therefore, the concept does not come from the human brain, the human brain can only achieve the material basis required by the concept, for example, the concept of food color can mobilize the regulation of nerve humor in our body, so that our flesh is ready to realize the concept. Ideas do not come from the human brain, they come from the "perceptual consciousness ontology."
How are we connected to the "perceptual consciousness ontology"? As long as you are not attached to the spiritual conscious impulses of the color-eating nature, you can find the interface between you and the Entity. Okay, jump out of your wine-colored wealth, fame and fortune and other miscellaneous ideas, and look at yourself as an object, and you will find that you can clearly and unambiguously observe the hands and feet of your flesh, and experience with your heart, who is the subject of contemplation at this time? Is it your brain? It can be said that because the sensory center of the brain processes countless sensory electrical signals, these signals give the physical signals formed by your flesh in your brain, which is the same as the nocturnal animal that feels infrared rays sees a humanoid red light, and the bat perceives the outline of a humanoid figure through ultrasonic positioning, but we clearly visualize the complex images of our own sounds, smiles, temperament, identity and so on, why? It is because this witnessing subject, with the help of our brains and its collection of ideas, that the perceptual facts about me that emerge in the conscious world of this contemplative subject are formed.
In the same way, we can clearly perceive that we see everything in the surrounding environment, that is, we can know that we see a colorful and beautiful world, who is seeing this? We will stubbornly think that this is what our eyes see, and then present it in our brain, so we know, so the explanation is only half right, the brain is physical, it processes complex information like a supercomputer, but can the computer know that it has processed a huge amount of data? It has no self-awareness, it can only work according to the rules set by the logic circuit, it does not know what it is doing, even it does not know its own existence, the brain is also this truth, the world we perceive, is the information processed in our brain, coupled with the countless ideas carried by the perceptual consciousness ontology, the perceptual facts that are finally presented in the perceptual consciousness are the perceptual consciousness that lets us know what we perceive.
Then, we can also clearly perceive our spiritual consciousness, we can clearly perceive the impulse when we see beautiful women, we can also clearly know that when we see the wallet on the ground, we want to take it for ourselves, and we can clearly and clearly take our spiritual consciousness as the object of observation, which is a unique ability of human beings, and any animal does not have this ability, so they can only live with instinctive ideology, not with the ideology of spiritual ethics. For example, the most intelligent primate monkeys can mate in public, they are not ashamed at all, they do not have this consciousness, they do not know what they are doing, they are only driven by instinct. Therefore, human beings are completely different, and the reason for this is because we have this conscious subject that can take spiritual consciousness as an object of observation, which is naturally higher dimensional than spiritual consciousness, which is in line with the basic logical principle that "existence must exist relative to the subject", where spiritual consciousness, as a being, must have a subject that is opposite to it and contemplates it, and this subject is the subject of perceptual consciousness, that is, the ontology of perceptual consciousness. (Next 8)