laitimes

Will Glalish's move to Manchester City be a lose-lose situation?

The summer transfer window for the 2021-2022 season, when Glaliches moved from Aston Villa to Manchester City for £100 million, I don't know what people think of the deal.

Will Glalish's move to Manchester City be a lose-lose situation?

The reason why this transaction occurred is actually a lot of interest entanglement.

In manchester City, after Aguero left the team, the team lacked a center who could support City's attacking system in a pure sense, but unfortunately, in the market, Guardiola really could not find a suitable candidate with special ability and price.

Will Glalish's move to Manchester City be a lose-lose situation?

So Guardiola retreated to the second place, thinking of the role played by Iniesta and David Silva when he played the main frontless team several times in his coaching career, without a positive forward, then engage in a multi-core system, and the effect is good.

Come to think of it, Gramillis, who is accustomed to moving on the left side and plays more like a forward, is the most suitable, and can form a new front-field drive double core with De Bruyne, and even add a nerve knife B seat to form a multi-core situation.

Will Glalish's move to Manchester City be a lose-lose situation?

For Gloris, the reason why he decided to leave Aston Villa, who had sworn allegiance to the death, was not because of how much he longed for Guardiola's football philosophy, but because he wanted to raise his value to a higher stage, thus adding weight to his own efforts to win the main force of the English national team.

Friends who have watched Euro 2020 may not remember such a scene: outside the arena, Mourinho and a number of English celebrities have said several times that Glalis is the most suitable left winger candidate for England; above the arena, Southgate is not moved, still going his own way, insisting on using Sterling.

Will Glalish's move to Manchester City be a lose-lose situation?

Even the young man Mount is more favored by Southgate than Glalish, in fact, The wingering style of The Glaliss forward can adapt to multiple positions, playing left winger is no problem, playing front back is not a problem.

But Southgate defines Grass as a substitute and a rotation, and the reason for this, I don't need to say more, right? Compared with the identity of Sterling's Premier League champion player, compared to the identity of Mount's Champions League champion, the core of Glorife Aston Villa's origin is really too shabby, but this position is not competitive, Southgate must trust Sterling and Mount who have experienced more big scenes.

Will Glalish's move to Manchester City be a lose-lose situation?

In a sense, this slightly awkward trip to the European Championship contributed to the transfer of Glalis, and it is obviously more tempting to become a legend in England than to become a monument to Aston Villa.

Everyone knows that in recent years, the momentum of the English team is good, the Premier League is doing well, the level of youth training is high, the talent of the national team is blowing up, and the record of international competitions is becoming more and more stable.

Gloris, will not fail to see through the joints, he very much wants to be the protagonist of such an English national team, the European Cup has become a supporting role, not tight, and the World Cup, the World Cup is a bigger stage, many players on this stage to become famous, famous in history.

Will Glalish's move to Manchester City be a lose-lose situation?

Glaris, of course, wants to be a hero in the spotlight.

So Aston Villa, who had been keeping Grališ in every way, suddenly became understanding, they did not want to delay Gralis's future, as long as the money was given enough, then Gralis was yours.

Well, 100 million, Manchester City smiled, conscience price, not expensive, deal.

Will Glalish's move to Manchester City be a lose-lose situation?

In this way, Guardiola found the "favorite" player, and Glalis came to the team of "yearning", and both sides had their own calculations.

Southgate also clapped his hands on the sidelines, for the English nurses, good looks, the people of Great Britain will love you, Pep!

Wait, this scene seems a little familiar, did Guardiola do the same at Bayern?

Will Glalish's move to Manchester City be a lose-lose situation?

However, similar to most of Guardiola's past whimsy, Gloris's transformation journey at Manchester City has been a bit difficult, although the team once squeezed Sterling to the bench, but the Premier League 11 appearances, scoring 1 goal, assisting 2 goals; 5 Appearances in the Champions League, attacking 1 goal, assisting 1 goal Data is not very good.

The biggest problem for Glallish is the number of touches, i.e., the massive reduction in ball possession. At Aston Villa, The team plays as much as the team wants, with the classical striker dominating the attack of the whole team; but at Manchester City, Glalish is only one of the components, even if he is entrusted with a heavy responsibility.

Will Glalish's move to Manchester City be a lose-lose situation?

For Glallish, this is an extremely painful process of adaptation, but it is also a process of having to adapt, if it is not well integrated into Manchester City's tactical system, it means that the move of improving self-worth has failed, then in Southgate's eyes, it is even more solid to the conclusion that he is only worthy of playing as a substitute.

For Guardiola, if Glaliche can't play, the 100 million big bet will also be declared a failure, just like Ibrahimovic can adapt to almost any team's lineup, but in Guardiola here is not smart, Glaglish is also a good player, Pep guardiola said: "Glalis played well!" ", but does he really have a bottom in his heart?

Will Glalish's move to Manchester City be a lose-lose situation?

Sterling, who has recently begun to become active again, will be squeezed to the right as soon as Glalish debuts, and I don't know if this will have an impact on Sterling, and Whether Sterling, whose overall playing time has been further reduced (Last season, Foden came out and seized a lot of Sterling's playing time), will he still be trusted by Southgate as always?

Southgate also scratched his head a little, according to Guardiola's arrangement, if Gralis kicked and kicked and scrapped, who would be more useful to Stirling or Foden?

The so-called pulling a hair and moving the whole body, getting it right, everyone is very happy, win more; if it is not good, it is difficult for everyone to do it, they are all victims, and they all lose. But what kind of ending will it be?

Will Glalish's move to Manchester City be a lose-lose situation?

Read on