The Broken Cube
Representation of the embodiment of different degrees of fitting of "rational"
After understanding that "reason" is a complex, large, matrix-like knowledge model like a Rubik's cube, I think there are two ways to fit this knowledge model.
The first is the fitting process of each person summarizing the rules by learning modeling, such as learning from different majors, different work and life methods, relying on a large amount of information received by the network, virtual exercises brought by games, etc. These learning, working, and life have established knowledge models, and the brain will automatically fit the rules therein, forming a set of unique knowledge model structure based on your life individual, like a broken little rubik's cube.
Example 1: A person A through the special art professional study, after work engaged in art design work, talked about love several times, usually like photography, drinking, creation, hobby games is the League of Legends, information intake is mainly B station, headlines, vibrato and other platforms, then the main framework of the knowledge model of this person's brain is to rely on the knowledge of long-term art professional learning, long-term work to obtain work-related knowledge, daily life and special conditions experience to obtain three aspects and form the main framework, Other information acquisition becomes a subsidiary framework because it cannot fit the complete knowledge.
In this case, the knowledge model in the A brain may fit the knowledge model of the macroscopic "theory" to 5%.
Here is a special point, that is, everyone's professional learning problem, if it is the professional study of the humanities in our country, the knowledge learned in its professional field can be fitted to the "theory", and the science major, almost can not fit the professional learning knowledge, fit into the "reason", which is also a lot of people confused, why the professional knowledge I learned in the society, it is useless; it is also the reason why many science students seem to be ignorant of human feelings and are more stupid; it is also the reason why "reason" The reason why we can only generalize the problem of "between people, between people and nature, and not between people and nature", I will give an example of this situation below.
Example 2: A friend of mine, a doctor of mining engineering and mineral processing from a university, has been a village branch secretary for two years, and the knowledge of other disciplines has also been partially ingested, and after returning to school, he has done the administrative management work of the department, has little love experience, is unmarried, and his usual life is relatively single, and the means of obtaining additional information are network information platforms, academic paper journals, and so on.
The knowledge model structure of this friend of mine is mainly based on the professional knowledge of his mining engineering mineral processing profession and the knowledge of other basic disciplines in the process of reaching his profession; the knowledge generated by the experience of life from childhood to adulthood is structure two; the knowledge learned by the professional field work and the sinking experience village branch secretary and the professional administrative management work is structure three; the knowledge involved in other disciplines is structure four; the knowledge that is obtained from additional information and fits the model of one's own brain is structure five.
In this case, the knowledge model in my friend's brain may fit 10% for the macroscopic "rational" knowledge model. So why is it that a learned Ph.D. does not have a proportional fit to "theory"?
The reason is that the field of expertise of doctoral study belongs to the category of natural sciences, and the generalized boundary of "reason" does not include the problem between nature and nature, resulting in its current fit for "reason" is not much higher than that of art students.
Below I will use individuals growing up in different environments to summarize the various degrees of fit of "reason", but no longer specifically explain the composition of its knowledge model, let's see how different people can fit "reason" through learning and experience accumulation, the following examples of examples I and II only contain universal laws, excluding some special individuals.
Example 1: The village party secretary who has been engaged in grass-roots work for a long time has a fit of 8% for "reason".
Example 2: The level of leadership that grew up during the war has a 70% fit for "reason".
Example 3: Our beloved Premier Zhou has an 80% fit for "reason".
Example 4: Our great Mao teachers have the highest degree of fitting to "reason" in modern times.
Here does not specifically evaluate the fit of leaders at all levels of "reason", only give an initial value and the maximum upper limit for easy understanding, since ancient times in China, we have "good practice in the six doors" and "small hidden in the mountains, hidden in the city, large hidden in the dynasty" the saying, in essence, different levels of state administrators, the content of work contact surface learning, ordinary people can not contact learning, so the knowledge model formed by the brain and the fit of "reason" will have a relatively large difference.
Example 5: Li Hongzhang, the fit of "reason" is 70%.
Example 6: Chiang Kai-shek, the fit of "reason" in the early days was 30%, and gradually grew in the later period, and the peak estimate was about 65%, and it is solemnly emphasized here that the fit of Mao's teachers in "reason" at any time was dimensionally reduced to hit Chiang Kai-shek.
The following example will be evaluated in terms of individuals engaged in business practices.
Example 7: Individuals engaged in business practices in different industries,
The fit to "reason" is 6%.
Example 8: The manager of a certain industry area has an 8% fit for "reason".
Example 9: Jack Ma, the fitting degree of "theory" is 25%.
Example 10: Cao Dawang, the degree of fit of "theory" is 35%
Example 11: Ren Zhengfei has a fitting degree of 40% for "reason".
Business people are limited by the "economic theory" is still in the "rational" boundary, can not effectively integrate into the "reason", so the general and "rational" fit is not high, the specific conflict performance for example, capital is bloody pursuit of profits and does not care about any means, and "reason" itself to solve the problem of "between people, between people and nature" will have a fundamental conflict, our country through reform and opening up, the proposed socialist market economy, in fact, is to generalize the "reason" into economic theory. In essence, socialism with Chinese characteristics is also to generalize "reason" into Marx's socialist theory and form China's unique socialism, which will not be unfolded here, and at the same time, the capitalist system, because of its own mixed interweaving of business and politics, and there is no knowledge model of "reason" in European and American civilization, can not effectively comprehensively solve the problem of "between people, between people and nature", will gradually expose its institutional shortcomings.
To sum up, through professional learning, work life learning, additional information acquisition and other methods to build a knowledge model, is our process of fitting the "reason", which is a kind of "rational" fitting method, the disadvantage of this way is that no one can never fit the "reason" to 100%, even if you infinitely improve the survival life of the individual, and the scope of learning can be extended to infinity (for example, let a life use the infinite life span to experience the unique life work of each life individual on the earth), It is also only infinitely close to fitting 100%, but can not do 100% fitting, which is why mentioned in the previous section, our Chinese thousands of years of history, tens of billions of population base, only two people completely fit the "reason". As for why, in the future chapters will explain, here is buried a foreshadowing, in Chinese culture, "reason" is an important part, then is there any other important part? The answer is yes and obvious, contained in a word we often use.
The next section will talk about another non-reproducible fit of "reason.".