Catfish is a kind of fish, it seems to be nonsense, although it looks cute and cute, but it is actually very ferocious, eating fish, that is, eating the same kind.
I remembered the famous meme of League of Legends.
TAM: I'm a fish! I'm a fish!! I'm a catfish!!! Not a toad.
How many people are dead or alive and don't recognize Tam as a fish? Even when I saw Tam, I still shouted, that toad first. ”
The reason for this misunderstanding is because catfish have large mouths. There is a proper term in economics called the "catfish effect", Norwegians have always been distressed about transporting sardines, everyone likes to eat fresh sardines, but sardines are easy to die when caught.
Occasionally someone accidentally dropped the catfish into the tank where the sardines were stored, and something wonderful happened. The big-mouthed catfish alarmed the sardines and avoided them, actively avoiding and bringing good fitness results, and eventually most of the sardines were brought to the table alive.
Sardines: I am such a personality, I would rather give people to eat than give fish to eat.
Therefore, the catfish effect refers to the introduction of management talents and the use of one person to activate the overall working state.
Hmmm, the original management is to create a high-pressure cannibalistic environment, do not work will be eaten, the so-called management of talent to do, in fact, similar to catfish. Western management is indeed very civilized, broad and profound, and wonderful to the pinnacle.
Catfish also have a characteristic, the guardian, catfish do not leave after spawning, but will stay for a period of time, protect the eggs and newly hatched small fish, male catfish will even contain the eggs in the big mouth, very magical.
No wonder League of Legends designed the Tamtun man protection skill, as it is, Tamtun you are treating you as a son, ADC is an auxiliary pro son, which is very reasonable.
But this feature is not all catfish in the world, only American catfish, catfish mothers in other places are not so responsible, after laying eggs, what to do, never look back. Therefore, the characteristics of catfish guardians are actually known after the discovery of the Americas.
Wonderfully, there was an ancient Greek god who was known as early as the 4th century BC.
The Complete Works of Aristotle: This catfish spawns in shallow water, usually near the roots and reeds of the plant. Eggs are sticky and stick to the roots of plants. The female catfish lays their eggs and leaves, while the male catfish stays behind to guard the eggs in case other small fish steal the eggs. They guard these eggs for 40 to 50 days until the newborn catfish are capable enough to escape from other fish.
Columbus discovered the American continent in 1492, and the actual discovery of catfish guardian habits was even later, because after the Europeans discovered the Americas, not many people were interested in catfish, and they were busy plundering and killing.
If the Study of American Catfish alone is to take place, it will not be until at least 1500 years later.
So, how did Aristotle know 2400 years ago that catfish have this property? Is this a crossing or a prediction of the future?
A book written by one person cannot surpass its contemporaries in any case, otherwise it must be a fake book. It's like you hung up in 1980, if you wrote the inside story of the 911 crash, as long as your brain is still normal, you will think that this book is fake.
This is also the most basic principle of identifying ancient books, Which Hu Shi mentioned, Liang Qichao mentioned, and even Hu Yinglin of the Ming Dynasty also mentioned. This is really a simple truth that cannot be simpler, and you can understand it without going to school.
But Westerners just don't understand that such a serious error occurred, and the Zoology is still included in the Complete Works of Aristotle.
There are many more mistakes like Aristotle's catfish, such as Herodotus's History, which openly calls the Achaemenid dynasty Persian, and even gives the Achaemenid capital a new name, Persepolis (the capital of Persia).
And our New Book of Tang records that the persian state was founded by the descendants of the Persian king. King Persia was a famous king in ancient India, a friend and disciple of Shakyamuni, who later became one of the two great protectors of Buddhism.
King of Persia is his name, translated as King of Beschi in the Buddhist scriptures, born in the city of Sherwei, and is an ancient Indian of the Eight Classics.
After the Ōtsuki clan occupied ancient India, his descendants fled to the vicinity of Baghdad and established a new state while the Empire was in decline. In order to find legal rights, but also to show their bloodline, two words were deliberately taken from the ancestral names as the name of the country, and it was also the name of the first king.
Persia was coined around the 5th century AD, how could Herodotus know about it in the 5th century BC?
So is it a mistransmission? The book of BC has been handed down to the present, I don't know how many times to reprint, will there be a clerical error when copying?
Speaking of this, all the writings of the ancient Greek gods, the most ill-fated ones are also here, and the ancient Greek books cannot be found in the original.
There is an important principle in our falsification, which is not trustworthy. You can't pop up a book out of thin air without a head and tail, and then say that it was written by so-and-so, and it was the product of so-and-so, such as the Book of Shang.
Because of the war and other reasons, the "Book of Shang" was once lost, and in the Eastern Jin Dynasty, Nei Shi Meizhao claimed that he had preserved the "Book of Shang" and dedicated it to the imperial court. For this reason, mei's version of the "Book of Shang" has been questioned a lot from the moment it came out, such as Zhu Xi and others, who publicly wrote articles accusing Mei Zhao of falsification, and gradually became academically recognized.
In the past, the "Book of Shang" that was required for scientific examinations was a fake, can you believe this? But that's the truth, and it's public, and everyone who reads it knows. False to false, but it makes sense, so still have to learn.
In the end, the discovery of "Qinghua Jian" also proved that Zhu Xi and others were right, and the "Book of Shang" was indeed not like that, to be precise, the truth and falsity were mixed, and there were true and false.
What if we questioned the standards of the Book of Shang and treated the ancient Greek writings?
The result was jaw-dropping, because all the writings of ancient Greece came out of nowhere.
Not to mention the Eastern Jin Dynasty, all the ancient Greeks that can be found today were originally printed, that is, the earliest was also the Renaissance (14th-17th centuries).
Good fellow, jump directly to the Ming Dynasty. This is equivalent to our claim that the "Book of Shang" was written by Confucius, but the earliest one was originally Hongwu eight years old, and Liu Bowen was ordered to print it.
The lack of originality in ancient Greek writings is a very puzzling problem. The simplest logic, there must be a hand copy if there is a printed body, otherwise you take what printing. Booksellers should understand the value of manuscripts no matter how sensible they are, and the Renaissance is not many years away from modern times, and it is not difficult to preserve a few manuscripts.
Sumerian 5,000 years of mud, ancient Egypt 4,000 years of straw paper pieces have been preserved, such an important manuscript has not been preserved? And it is all, the ancient Greek writings have not been handed down a single manuscript.
I know that someone should cite the Western record, XXX year so-and-so copied the Aristotle manuscript, the question is the manuscript? These accounts are only records, never the originals are seen.
The book is fake like this, the American catfish Persian Empire has come out, still ripping the record, if their records are credible, why do we still use this?
The ancient Greek works we see now, let alone the originals, are not even second-hand and third-hand, and the original source cannot be found at all. Why?
The Western falsification master Walla once said: "If you are a fraud, it is easiest to be alone." ”
It's like a migrant worker on the side of the road talking to you, mysteriously touching a bronze wine cup from his arms and telling you that he had just dug out of the construction site last week.
Can you refute it? No matter how unreliable it is, it has a 1% probability of being true, maybe 1% is too much, but regardless of one in a thousand, it has a very small probability of being true. You can only smile contemptuously in your heart, "This matter has been seen a lot, and there is no good thing that pie has fallen from the sky." ”
Will pie fall from the sky? Can't say no, in case there are fools who like to squat on the top of 30 floors and smash people with pies. But now the situation is that the pie has all fallen to the ancient Greek family, and all the ancient books that have been lost for thousands of years have appeared inexplicably in the 14th century.
This is the easiest way to fake a single book, I just touched the book from my arms and said that I just dug out of the construction site last week, how can you drip.
In the evidence theory, this is called death without proof, and we are absolutely skeptical of this thing, but the ancient Greeks have become the absolute standard.
All ancient Greek artifacts are similar to those just dug up at the construction site last week.
In 2016, the British magazine Nature published a news article claiming that a major discovery had been made near the Greek island of Antikychra, and that an ancient Greek shipwreck had been salvaged.
Fishing for cultural relics in the sea, this is not uncommon in ancient Greece, almost all important, representative cultural relics are sea fishing, which is similar to the digging site.
There is no proof of death, they are just lucky, smashing pie on the door of the brain every day.
Only this time the luck could not be explained, because they actually claimed that there was a skeleton in the wreck.
Ancient Greek skeletons, at least 2000 years old, you say you make a bronze statue is even if you don't care, the sea water will not soak the bronze statue again, no matter how good luck is to smoke, in short, it is reasonable.
But this is a skeleton, it is organic. Let's not talk about how corrosive seawater is, how many microorganisms in the sea, they are all vegetarian?
If the bones could be preserved in the sea, the seabed would have been filled with various fish bones.
Even if the whale dies less than 20 years after its death, the bones will be degraded by all kinds of small fish, all kinds of microorganisms, and there will be no slag left.
How? Ancient Greek bones were made of titanium alloy?
Such a ridiculous thing was solemnly declared by Nature magazine, and it claimed to analyze DNA to find the truth about the ancient Greek race.
This is a common father-finding routine in Western archaeology, analysis to analyze, the result must be how the ancient Greeks and modern Westerners match, ancient Greeks are the fathers of modern Westerners, they are the chosen sons, race is superior to everything.
By the way, this shipwreck is one of the ancient Greek shipwrecks discovered in 1900, and the 2016 investigation is a follow-up. The shipwreck, which was discovered more than 100 years ago, has been tossed around for so long, and it is also amazing that the remains have been found now.
A number of epoch-making artifacts were found in the wrecks, such as the Antikishira machine, which claimed to be the world's first computer.
There are also many large statues, known as the "Aegean Relics", the two largest of which, one named Philosopher and one named Antikishra Youth.
Because it is really incomprehensible, but it is impossible not to report, such as "China Cultural Relics News" and "China Science News" can only write very vaguely. The discovery was first reproduced, and then noted, after interviewing underwater archaeologists, the experts said: "Nothing is known about this matter." ”
Of course, the so-called dna identification of the skeleton, like the skeleton of the tomb of the king of your, is no longer followed.
People are invincible, just don't have a face, what can you do?
There is a follow-up to Aristotle's catfish, and Louis Agassiz, a Swiss paleontologist in the 19th century, claimed that in a river in Greece, the catfish there also had protective characteristics, so he named the fish Aristotle catfish.
But it is puzzling that the only river in the whole of Greece produces that catfish, and the locals have not known about it for thousands of years.
Well, the fishermen didn't know it, and had to wait until Agassi discovered it in the 19th century.
More strange things are still to come, Agassi first went to the United States, discovered the characteristics of the American catfish guardian, so he returned to Greece, and sure enough, he found the catfish with the characteristics.
You say I believe this? Or do you believe he brought a few catfish from the United States and threw them into the Greek river?
By the way, this Agassi was a master scholar and a devout believer. His views are highly controversial, such as opposing evolution and using biology to justify racism.
In other words, the purpose of his research is to find ways to prove biologically that the Western European race is God's people and is born better than you.
This is the current state of archaeology in the West, they will not fake? What's the weight of Nature? What is the status of Agassi? I didn't touch a fish from the United States.