The hat of the loss of state-owned assets should not fly all over the sky

In the past few days, after watching Sima Nan's video on the loss of state-owned assets in lenovo's restructuring, Comrade Sima Nan has been sprinkled with foreign spirits, taking the materials provided by a Chinese Academy of Sciences insider under the pseudonym Mingde as the main basis, and making three consecutive videos, as if he did not stop without pulling out the shady scenes. Lenovo restructuring is basically still relatively transparent, when there is no later entrepreneurial environment, basically to wear a red hat, and then take off the hat there are various ways, there are many positive and negative examples, MBO can not get some entrepreneurs in prison.

There is no objection to turning over the old accounts of that year, but there must be facts and basis for the loss of state-owned assets? It is meaningless to leave the historical background, if it is believed that there is an absolute standard for the valuation of enterprises, most of the state-owned enterprise restructuring is estimated to be repeated. At that time, Liu Chuanzhi had already expressed his position, their founders did not take the equity to start a new stove, Lenovo this kind of enterprise, without these founders, can state-owned assets maintain and increase in value? Brilliance has gone to Yangrong, has the state-owned assets maintained and increased?

Lenovo's problem is the problem of corporate governance and wealth distribution, and it is too late to mention whether the restructuring was the loss of state-owned assets in that year. First of all, this transaction was publicly listed on the Beijing Equity Exchange and approved by regulatory authorities at all levels. The second is that sima nan video listed the use of shareholders' equity to introduce the valuation is not correct, equity transaction is to evaluate the assets after negotiating consideration, not to use the book assets multiplied by a transfer ratio, the book asset value is a static value, and the transaction price can be higher or lower (can be evaluated in different ways, the two parties to the transaction can negotiate what results can be accepted). Those who know the stock market know how many stocks in A shares are currently priced below the net assets per share, many of them are state-owned holding companies (less than 50% of the net assets per share), according to Sima Nan, it is a loss of state-owned assets every day! In the final analysis, if you say that the loss of state-owned assets is to come up with legal evidence to prove that it is illegal and illegal operation, otherwise it is to throw out a big hat to scare people and provoke "hatred of the rich".