天天看点

Spring的循环依赖和三级缓存

前提

(1)作者技术比较差,文章写的比较随意,也可能有错误,欢迎您指出。

(2)如果您不了解Spring Bean的声明周期,那么您可以看一下文章(​​Bean的生命周期_CBeann的博客-​​)或者百度其它文章,然后在回来看该文章,否则个人感觉应该看不懂

解决循环依赖

假设有一种下面的情况,A中有B,B中有A

@Data
public class A {
  private B b;
  public A() {System.out.println("A 无参构造器。。。");}
  public void speak() {System.out.println("------AAA---------");}
}

@Data
public class B {
  public B() {System.out.println("B 无参构造器。。。");}
  private A a;
  public void speak() {System.out.println("------BBB---------");}
}      

图片分析

Spring的循环依赖和三级缓存

代码分析

在创建的A的时候调用doCreateBean方法

1)调用A无参构造方法创建Bean

2)把该bean对象添加到三级缓存中(在下面的代码中有注释)

3)Bean的属性赋值,A的里面引用了B,所以此时会调用doCteateBean(B)

//AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory
protected Object doCreateBean(final String beanName, final RootBeanDefinition mbd, final @Nullable Object[] args)
      throws BeanCreationException {
      {

    // Instantiate the bean.
    BeanWrapper instanceWrapper = null;
    if (mbd.isSingleton()) {
      //省略
    }
    if (instanceWrapper == null) {
        //1)调用无参构造方法创建Bean
      instanceWrapper = createBeanInstance(beanName, mbd, args);
    }
    final Object bean = instanceWrapper.getWrappedInstance();
    Class<?> beanType = instanceWrapper.getWrappedClass();
    if (beanType != NullBean.class) {
      mbd.resolvedTargetType = beanType;
    }

    
    synchronized (mbd.postProcessingLock) {
      //省略
    }

    
    boolean earlySingletonExposure = (mbd.isSingleton() && this.allowCircularReferences &&
        isSingletonCurrentlyInCreation(beanName));
    if (earlySingletonExposure) {
      if (logger.isTraceEnabled()) {
        //省略
      }
      //2)把该bean对象添加到三级缓存中,注意getEarlyBeanReference方法,特别有用
      addSingletonFactory(beanName, () -> getEarlyBeanReference(beanName, mbd, bean));
    }

    // Initialize the bean instance.
    Object exposedObject = bean;
    try {
        //3)Bean的属性赋值
      populateBean(beanName, mbd, instanceWrapper);
      //4)处理aware接口、applyBeanPostProcessorsBeforeInitialization、initMethod
      exposedObject = initializeBean(beanName, exposedObject, mbd);
    }
    catch (Throwable ex) {
      if (ex instanceof BeanCreationException && beanName.equals(((BeanCreationException) ex).getBeanName())) {
        //省略
      }
      else {
        //省略
      }
    }

    if (earlySingletonExposure) {
      //省略
    }

    // Register bean as disposable.
    try {
      registerDisposableBeanIfNecessary(beanName, bean, mbd);
    }
    catch (BeanDefinitionValidationException ex) {
      //省略
    }

    return exposedObject;
  }





}      

 此时在创建B的时候调用getBean(A),然后会走到下面代码的地方,从三级缓存中获取到A(B=null),返回该不完整的A的地址,然后B创建成功,然后继续创建A,然后A也创建成功。

-------------------------源码1

//DefaultSingletonBeanRegistry
protected Object getSingleton(String beanName, boolean allowEarlyReference) {
        //从一级缓存中获取,即IOC容器,即完整的Bean对象
    Object singletonObject = this.singletonObjects.get(beanName);
    if (singletonObject == null && isSingletonCurrentlyInCreation(beanName)) {
      synchronized (this.singletonObjects) {
                //从二级缓存中获取
        singletonObject = this.earlySingletonObjects.get(beanName);
        if (singletonObject == null && allowEarlyReference) {
                    //从三级缓存中获取
          ObjectFactory<?> singletonFactory = this.singletonFactories.get(beanName);
          if (singletonFactory != null) {
            singletonObject = singletonFactory.getObject();
            this.earlySingletonObjects.put(beanName, singletonObject);
            this.singletonFactories.remove(beanName);
          }
        }
      }
    }
    return singletonObject;
  }      

循环依赖总结

       (1)创建A的时候调用A的无参构造方法,然后在把得到的地址A(B=null)放入到三级缓存中,然后填充自己的属性B,也就会创建B;

       (2)当创建B的时候,填充自己的属性A,从三级缓存中拿到A(B=null)地址,然后B创建成功;

       (3)此时回到(1),此时拿到B,然后完善A,创建A成功。

       (4)因为在(2)中拿到的是A的地址,所以在(3)中完善A在B中是一个。      

三级缓存

疑问

个人感觉二级缓存足矣,为什么还要三级缓存?

反驳疑问

假设下面的场景:只有singletonObject(第一级缓存)和singletonFactory (第三级缓存),即没有earlySingletonObjects(第二级缓存)

如果有这么一种情况A(B),B(A),还有一个AOP是关注A的某个方法

此时的逻辑为:

1)创建A

2)把A(B=null)的地址(abc)存入singletonFactory缓存中

3)创建B

4)B在赋值a属性的时候,在singletonFactory缓存中拿出A的地址(abc)并且赋值给属性a(左边这句话是错的)(这就是三级缓存的关键),

     4.1)没有AOP的时候,确实是存的a的地址,没错,返回的也是a的地址。

      4.2)如果有AOP,确实存进去的是a的地址,但是返回的已经不是A的地址了,是A的代理对象地址(看源码2,3,4)。

总结:此时就出现问题了,如果没有earlySingletonObjects(第二级缓存),那么每次在singletonFactory (第三级缓存)中拿到的A对象都会创建创建一个代理对象,即每次向依赖A的对象中赋的值都是不同的代理对象,那么就不符合单例模式了。

-------------------------源码2

protected Object getEarlyBeanReference(String beanName, RootBeanDefinition mbd, Object bean) {
    Object exposedObject = bean;
    if (!mbd.isSynthetic() && hasInstantiationAwareBeanPostProcessors()) {
      for (BeanPostProcessor bp : getBeanPostProcessors()) {
        if (bp instanceof SmartInstantiationAwareBeanPostProcessor) {
          SmartInstantiationAwareBeanPostProcessor ibp = (SmartInstantiationAwareBeanPostProcessor) bp;
          exposedObject = ibp.getEarlyBeanReference(exposedObject, beanName);
        }
      }
    }
    return exposedObject;
  }      

-------------------------源码3 

//AbstractAutoProxyCreator
@Override
  public Object getEarlyBeanReference(Object bean, String beanName) {
    Object cacheKey = getCacheKey(bean.getClass(), beanName);
    this.earlyProxyReferences.put(cacheKey, bean);
        //跟进去
    return wrapIfNecessary(bean, beanName, cacheKey);
  }      

-------------------------源码4

//AbstractAutoProxyCreator
protected Object wrapIfNecessary(Object bean, String beanName, Object cacheKey) {
    if (StringUtils.hasLength(beanName) && this.targetSourcedBeans.contains(beanName)) {
      return bean;
    }
    if (Boolean.FALSE.equals(this.advisedBeans.get(cacheKey))) {
      return bean;
    }
    if (isInfrastructureClass(bean.getClass()) || shouldSkip(bean.getClass(), beanName)) {
      this.advisedBeans.put(cacheKey, Boolean.FALSE);
      return bean;
    }

    // Create proxy if we have advice.
    Object[] specificInterceptors = getAdvicesAndAdvisorsForBean(bean.getClass(), beanName, null);
    if (specificInterceptors != DO_NOT_PROXY) {
      this.advisedBeans.put(cacheKey, Boolean.TRUE);
            //返回了一个新对象,新地址
            //返回了一个新对象,新地址
            //返回了一个新对象,新地址
      Object proxy = createProxy(
          bean.getClass(), beanName, specificInterceptors, new SingletonTargetSource(bean));
      this.proxyTypes.put(cacheKey, proxy.getClass());
      return proxy;
    }

    this.advisedBeans.put(cacheKey, Boolean.FALSE);
    return bean;
  }      

总结

1)在没有AOP的情况下二级缓存足矣解决循环依赖,三级缓存更能解决问题。

2)三级缓存其实也是解决循环依赖的,是解决带AOP的循环依赖的,如上文中举的例子。如果您查的三级缓存资料没有说AOP,个人感觉这篇文章写的不是很充实。

本文没有回答的疑问

疑问1

上问中反驳二级缓存不能解决带AOP的循环依赖问题时,是把earlySingletonObjects(第二级缓存)去掉;如果我说我去掉singletonFactory (第三级缓存),那该如何反驳二级缓存不能解决带AOP的循环依赖问题呢???

疑问2

就拿上问中举的例字来说,A依赖B,B依赖A,有一个关注A的AOP。

下面是创建Bean声明周期的一段代码,以创建A为例

//AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory
protected Object doCreateBean{
//创建A
Object exposedObject = bean;
    try {
            //初始化A,因为A中有属性B,此时去创建B,然后把A的代理对象存入earlySingletonObjects缓存中,B创建完毕,然后又回到此处继续初始化A
      populateBean(beanName, mbd, instanceWrapper);
            //为非代理对象A执行aware接口等等
      exposedObject = initializeBean(beanName, exposedObject, mbd);
    }
    catch (Throwable ex) {
      //省略
      }
    }

    if (earlySingletonExposure) {
            //在earlySingletonObjects中拿到代理对象A
      Object earlySingletonReference = getSingleton(beanName, false);
      if (earlySingletonReference != null) {
        if (exposedObject == bean) {
                    //把exposedObject由指向非代理对象A变为指向代理对象A,那么
                    //exposedObject = initializeBean(beanName, exposedObject, mbd);
                    //我认为是白做了,我不清楚这个地方???????????????
          exposedObject = earlySingletonReference;
        }
        else if (!this.allowRawInjectionDespiteWrapping && hasDependentBean(beanName)) {
          String[] dependentBeans = getDependentBeans(beanName);
          Set<String> actualDependentBeans = new LinkedHashSet<>(dependentBeans.length);
          for (String dependentBean : dependentBeans) {
            if (!removeSingletonIfCreatedForTypeCheckOnly(dependentBean)) {
              actualDependentBeans.add(dependentBean);
            }
          }
          if (!actualDependentBeans.isEmpty()) {
            throw new BeanCurrentlyInCreationException(beanName,
                "Bean with name '" + beanName + "' has been injected into other beans [" +
                StringUtils.collectionToCommaDelimitedString(actualDependentBeans) +
                "] in its raw version as part of a circular reference, but has eventually been " +
                "wrapped. This means that said other beans do not use the final version of the " +
                "bean. This is often the result of over-eager type matching - consider using " +
                "'getBeanNamesOfType' with the 'allowEagerInit' flag turned off, for example.");
          }
        }
      }

}      

如果有知道上面两个问题答案的,可以在下问中评论,一起学习,共同进步

参考

看为什么要三级缓存的话从70分钟开始看