Yu Yang: High scores on the "three books", the reform of the college entrance examination system should not be backed

Recently, the first professional score of the general parallel class of the Zhejiang college entrance examination was revealed, and the result was quite surprising, and the minimum score line of five or six independent colleges entered the top 100. The lowest pitching line of 646 points in Zhejiang College of Tongji University even exceeds the minimum pitching line of Wuhan University, Nankai University and Sun Yat-sen University. The Jincheng College of Sichuan University (637 points), the School of Science and Technology of North China Electric Power University (614 points), the North Central College of Nanjing Normal University (631 points), and the Tianjin College of the University of Science and Technology Beijing (609 points) also far exceeded the minimum pitch line of some original colleges. (July 19, China Youth Daily)

The so-called independent college refers to the ordinary higher education institutions that implement bachelor's degree or above education and cooperate with social organizations or individuals other than state institutions, and use non-state financial funds to organize higher education institutions that implement undergraduate degree education, which is commonly known as "three books" in society. Because of its high tuition fees and uneven teaching quality, independent colleges have been controversial in society, and even their graduates have been falsely labeled in job recruitment. But in addition to the astonishment of these record-breaking high scores of independent colleges, more people are lamenting these high-scoring candidates, wondering why independent colleges, which were originally located in the second batch of admissions, were favored by high-scoring candidates.

As we all know, undergraduate batch mergers have been in full swing in recent years. As early as 2015, Zhejiang merged the second and third books, and this year, the Zhejiang college entrance examination volunteer reporting system took the lead in carrying out drastic reforms, adopting "no batches, professional parallel submission", and the previous batch admission principle is no longer applicable to this year's voluntary reporting. This also gives the independent colleges, which were originally in the second batch of admissions, the opportunity to compete with the original colleges, and then the situation of independent colleges rolling over famous schools.

As soon as the news of the independent college crushing the famous school came out, it immediately triggered a fierce war of words. Many people have questioned that the reform of the college entrance examination volunteer reporting system is too big, which will confuse the original orderly filling in the reporting work. Some people argue that there is nothing wrong with the starting point of the reform or even the system itself, but that these are the consequences of these misfilled high-scoring candidates in independent colleges who do not carefully study the institutions. However, many more blame this regrettable result on the first voluntary filing system.

When it was first implemented, no one had any experience and could not have expected such a large deviation. Batch combination is a good thing, at least for those who dare to forge ahead, but are trapped in the "origin" of independent institutions to provide a direct stage to compete with famous schools. Secondly, the increasingly fierce competition in colleges and universities can also force some colleges and universities to improve their level of education and enhance the quality of teaching.

On the other hand, those students who scored high on the "three books", with more than 600 points in the college entrance examination, have a very strong learning ability but are bent on volunteering to fill in the report, just because of the first implementation of the reporting system, how can not be said. The author believes that their contempt and negligence in volunteering are equally to blame. Although the batch is no longer clearly divided this year, but today, when the network is highly developed, it is not difficult to check the pitch scores and specific rankings in recent years. If they had done sufficient research and consultation before volunteering, how could such a flaw have occurred? Although the score of the college entrance examination is important, it cannot be ignored by volunteering to fill in the report.

What scores to go to what school, students with high scores go to famous schools, and students with low scores go to "three books", there is no such rule, and the graduates of Tsinghua Peking University must be better than the graduates of ordinary colleges and universities. However, the regrettable result of this time is that everyone does not want to see, but this may be a quality assessment of the college entrance examination reform, and the test is also to remind the relevant departments to take into account the follow-up of preventive measures while opening the college entrance examination reform, so as not to let similar incidents repeat.

Source: Hubei Daily

Author: Yu Yang