Song Tuoben of the Southern and Northern Dynasties Liang Guo Moya carved stone "Crane Ming". Cut-out, 15 pages, 2 characters per page, length 24.5 cm, width 14.6 cm. The calligraphy is thick and ancient, with a strange and flying pen, although it is called a calligraphy, with a slight sense of calligraphy and calligraphy, and the characters reveal the charm of the Six Dynasties period, which is the style of the Sui and Tang dynasties. The literati calligraphers of the past generations have been highly evaluated and have had a great influence on the book world of later generations.
This inscription has been circulated very rarely, this book of paper ink is mellow, the words are not ripped off, the god is full of energy, just like the real handiwork, "not chased by Wu Xiang" of the "Chasing Wu" 2 words left only slightly damaged, "Xiang" left "sheep" part of the right point is still seen; The lower left point of the word "floating" of "fetal bird floating" still exists, which is actually the oldest surviving extension. This extension has PanNing inscription, Panning Wang Wenzhi, Fei Zhaokun, Tie Bao, etc., and there are 23 Tibetan seals such as the Southern Song Dynasty "You Xiang", the Qing "Chong'en Private Seal", and "Shi Bin". Zhang Yansheng's "Rare Book Stele Thesis". It is now in the Palace Museum.
"Crane Ming" is a stone carving, originally on the stone wall of the western foothills of Jiaoshan in Zhenjiang, Jiangsu Province, which was struck by lightning and collapsed on the Yangtze River during the Song Dynasty. In the fifty-second year of the Qing Kangxi Dynasty (1713), Chen Pengnian recruited workers to relocate the mountain, and then built into the Dinghui Temple. The inscription on the stone is written by Huayang Zhenyi, shanghuangshan qiao shu. There have historically been different accounts of the author and chronology. Song Huangtingjian and Su Shunqin believe that it is Wang Xizhi's book, and some people think that it is the Tang People's Gu Quan and Wang Zhan's book. Song Jinshi's Huang Bo thought about liang tao hongjing book, and later generations agreed with this statement. Tao Hongjing (452-536), character Tongming, late Huayang Zhenyi.
The font of "Crane Ming" is thick and ancient, and the pen is strange and flying, and the style of Lishu and Xingshu is kneaded in the calligraphy, which is quite influenced by the calligraphy of the Six Dynasties. Song Huangting was praised as "the first broken silicon remnant wall, is not the most precious treasure". Cao Shimian's "Genealogy of the Fa Ti" Yun: "The magic of the brushwork is the crown of the scribe." Song Wuju described in the poem: "The wandering monk who crossed the dragon bowl, the passerby competed to touch the "Crane Ming". It can be seen that people attach importance to this inscription. His calligraphy has a great influence on later generations, and has been the style of calligraphy since the Sui and Tang dynasties.
Zhenjiang Jiaoshan Has beautiful scenery and has been a popular spot for literati and inkers since ancient times. The existing inscriptions of famous people in Shanyan are known as the "Ancestor of Big Characters" and "The Hero of the Bookmaker". This inscription was originally engraved at the foot of Jiaoshan Mountain, and it is not known when it collapsed. Because of the perennial flooding of the waves, people can only wait for the winter and spring to fall, and spread it between the stone gaps. The Jinshi scholar used the obtained words to complete the original text. The inscription reads: "Huayang Zhenyi, ShanghuangShan Qiao Shu". Yan Renchen received a crane at Huating (present-day Songjiang County, Shanghai), and was folded in Zhufang (present-day Zhenjiang, Jiangsu), where the crane breeders buried it and wrote a mingle stone. Because the author did not disclose the surname and entrusted the name of the fairy, did not disclose the age but only remembered the stem branch, so it left a difficult mystery for posterity. The opinions of the examiners are diverse, and almost all the lawsuits are settled, and the controversy is still inconclusive. A storyteller is Wang Xizhi. The first book to be included in the Book of Ruhe Ming was the Runzhou Tujing written by Tang Sun Chuxuan, which was lost during the Southern Song Dynasty. According to Ouyang Xiu's "Collection of Ancient Records", "According to the Runzhou Tujing, it used to be the book of Wang Xi. But Ouyang Xiu did not believe this, and he immediately followed up with the above: "However, it is not similar to the Xi Zhi Pen Method, but like Yan Lugong, I don't know who wrote it." Huang Tingjian particularly appreciated this inscription: "The Right Army tasted the play as the Dragon Claw Book, and now it is no longer seen, Yu Guan 'Crane Ming', if it is flying, will it be his legacy? Ouyang Gong used the Lu Gong Song Wenzhen Stele to obtain the "Crane Ming" method, and looked at its penmanship in detail, and judged it as a public statement. (After the title "Fistula Ming")
The Northern Song Dynasty Su Zimei, the Southern Song Dynasty Zhao Shu, the Yuan Hao Jingbo, the Ming Yuan Zhongdao, the Qing Shengzu, the Qing Gaozong, the Wu Yun, and the Qian Sheng all held this view, and the reason for this was probably as Yuan Zhongdao said: "Lu Zhi is extremely deep in calligraphy, and seems to have something to rely on, and the famous people of recent times think that it is based." ”
There are three dissenters to Wang Xi's book, one is Cai Xiang: "The crane is not Yi Shaozi,...... Since the Sui Ping Chen Zhong, the kingdom is mostly referred to by Kai Li, and the Crane Wen has a Kai Li pen, which is the Sui Dynasty Book" ("Zhonghui Collection"); it is Huang Bosi, with Wang Xi's experience contrasting with the ganzhi in the inscription, the Jin Dynasty Emperor Xian and the ninth year of Jia Wu, Xi Zhi fang is 32 years old, should not call himself Zhenyi. The third is the allusion to "Thunder Gate To Drum" in the Crane Inscription comes from the "Linhai Chronicle": "In the past, crane morning flyers would audit the thunder door drum, and the drum sounded Luoyang, Sun En cut the drum, and the crane flew away." Liu Changshi quoted this allusion, thinking that "Enqi attacked huijian, killed the son of Yi Shao, and covered it for three years in Long'an, and the drum would be cut at this time. (Ashura Notes)
The second speaker was Tao Hongjing of the Liang Dynasty (456–536). This theory was first proposed by Huang Bosi, and his "Treatise on the Remainder of the Eastern View" is very detailed. This theory is not praised by Ma Ziyan, Cao Shimian, Cai Xiu, Hu Zai, Liu Changshi, Yuan has Lu You, Tao Zongyi, Liu Guan, Ming has Du Mu, Gu Yuanqing, Wang Shizhen, Gu Yanwu, Sun Kehong, Cheng Kangzhuang, Lin Tong, Wang Shichen, Wang Chang, Sun Xingyan, and others, as Weng Fanggang said, "I think that Tao hermits ,...... Where dozens of families", ("Ming out Of Tao Zhen Bai Discernment") is mainly based on the following points: First, as far as calligraphy is concerned, Huang Bosi said: "Servants are examined and approved, Wenge calligraphy, special tao Hongjing" is concerned.
Ma Zi Yanyun: "Looking closely at the various moments of Tao's seclusion, and repeatedly distinguishing in detail, I know that this inscription is the book of true Tao, and the predecessors call it a multitude, but Chang Ruizhi said it." (Jiao Shan Zhi. Ma Zi Yan Title") Cao Shi MianYun: "Jiao Shan 'Fist Crane Ming' penmanship is wonderful, crowned for the calligrapher, the predecessors admire its characters and do not know its people, and finally Yunlinzi takes Huayang Zhenyi as Tao Hongjing, and the Hongjing Zhuyang Pavilion engraved by the sentence song to participate in the school, but the doubts of the public are relieved, and its appreciation can be described as exquisite. (Genealogy of the Fa Ti) The Qing dynasty people Gu Yanwu and Wang Chang both regarded the Tao Shu as similar to the Crane Ming and regarded the Ming as the Tao Shu.
2. As far as the other name is concerned, Huang Bosi calls himself a hermit in Huayang with Tao; now it is known as the 'true yi' sound, is it not another name and another name? Cai Xiuyun: "To read "Daozang", Tao Hermit Huayang Zhenren, late Huayang Zhenyi." ("Western Qing Poetry") Hu Zai quoted the "Western Qing Poetry" and added research. Liu Changshi said: "Yu Yin Kao designated Huayang Zhenyi as Tao's hermitage, pushing the original to the end, or Shu Ji Yan. Wang Shizhen also believed that Hu Zai's argument was "more well-founded", and the Ming Dynasty Zhou Hui's "Jinling Trivia" quoted: "Tang. Li Shi's "Continuation of the Museum" Yun: "Tao Hermitage Book "Crane Ming". Wang Shichen's "Notes on Xiangzu" said: "Gu Yuanqing made an inscription examination and quoted all the sayings, but did not cite this evidence." And bluntly said that Heming was written by Tao.
Third, on the deduction of the dry branch, Huang Bosiyun: "He also wrote the True Truth, but Yun Himself was old and did not write the name of the year, and other books were also written. Now that Ming Nongchen is old, Jia Wu is not written in the name of the year, which can be proved, "Huang also contrasts the experience of The Ganzhi and Tao Hongjing in the inscription, qianchen is the eleventh year of the Great Prison, and Jia Wu is the thirteenth year of the Heavenly Prison, and Tao Hongjing was in Huayang at that time." Dong Kui and Liu Guan both quoted this. Cheng Kangzhuang further pointed out: "Huayang is in runzhou territory, Jiaoshan mountain is quite close, it belongs to its own staff and shoes, when it travels to and from the ghost, it wants to borrow the famous mountain to pass on, and secretly keep its name secret, so that future generations can grope for it... Kao Zhen Bai used to want to rise, and he was quite tired of fame. ”
("The Crane Ming")
There are also dissenters to Tao Hongjingyi's statement, such as Dong Kui, although he quoted Huang Bosi's opinion in full, but believed that "the line of Zhenbai self-written in front of the Maoshan Stele is very different from the present inscription, so it must not be written by Tao Hermitage." Dong Wenmin believes: "In the past, people used the "Crane Ming" as a Tao hermitage book, which is similar to Huayang Ti, but Huayang is a rate change pen, and Wen's stop cloud post is wrongly marked. (Ou Fanggang quoted in the Rongtai Collection)
The three theories are written by Wang Zhuo (Zhenguan Jianren), Gu Guan (727-815), and Pi Rixiu (834-883) of the Tang Dynasty.
Wang Zhan said that it was proposed by Zhang Huan, and Cai You agreed with this statement: "... Although the names and sages of the predecessors are not different, duzhangzi Houxiang does not think so. ...... On its side, there are tens of small characters inscribed by Si Bing who joined the army, and together with the calligraphy and painting of the "Crane Ming", although there is no age to examine, the official name is a Tang dynasty, then Zhang Cheng Xiang can be described as Ming Jianye. (Jiao Shan Zhi cites "Cai You's Miscellaneous Records") Liu Wuyan is also suspected to be Wang Zhan's book. However, Huang Bosi believes that Wang Zhan's calligraphy and painting "although it is quite similar to the "Fistula Crane Ming", but the gesture is weak, when it is a pottery book, so it is inscribed on the stone side, or the inscription is mistaken. Gu Said. Shen Kuo refers directly to the Gu Situation Book. Ouyang Xiu's Collected Ancient Records. In the True Works of the Eight Tails, it is said: "Or Yunhuayang Zhenyi is the code name of Gu Situation, and the inscription is also what it has done." But in the "Collection of Ancient Records." The "Baowei Collection" changed the saying: "Huayang Zhenyi is the code name of Gu Situation, and now I dare not think that it is the situation, the stele has no year, and it is suspected that there are people before and after the same number." Zhao Mingcheng objected: "Ouyang Gong's "JiGulu" Yun: Huayang Zhenyi is the code name of Gu Situation. Yu repeatedly examined the history of the Tang Dynasty and the collection of documents, but there was no such number, but the situation wrote the "Records of the Huzhou Assassination History Hall" and claimed to be a huayang mountain person, and did not know what the Ou Gong had based on. No one answered Zhao Mingcheng's question positively, but some people repeated that Gu Guandao's name was Huayang Zhenyi, or thought that Ming was Gu Guanshu, such as Yuan Zhongdao, Jiao Zhu, and Zhu Yizun.
Regarding Gu Shuzhi's statement, Dong Kui said: "Yu Yu on the cliff has obtained Tang poetry. After the poem has been inscribed in the Zhenguan, the inscription can be known when it is not considered. ("Guangchuan Shuba") also talked about this poem, that is, Wang Zhan's author. Pi Rixiu said. At the beginning of the Qing Dynasty, it was proposed by Cheng Nangeng, Yuan Ming was convinced, and for the work, He Zhuo and Ding Jing even quoted Pi Poems as testimony. Its main basis is threefold: First, the experience of Pi Rixiu is contrasted with the inscription, "The thirteenth year of Xiantong, the first year of Emperor Qianzong's first year, the attack on the United States is in Wuzhong, and its years coincide." The second is that Pi Rixiu "has a mourning crane poetry cloud: "but burys The Will of the People's Burial order', the evidence of this crane is also self-prologue: 'The huating crane smells the old, and now Wu has half a thousand dollars, and he has a crane, and he has died in the old age, and he mourns poetry." “
Tortoise Meng and Shi Yun: "More to Shibata for inscription, 'the basis of this inscription also,' (Yuan Ming's "Suiyuan Essay Supplement") The third is "The poems of Dr. Nanyang in the collection and Maoshan Guangwen are not written surnames... Elsewhere in the set, it is called the age of Cheng, the age of Gengyin, and neither of them is written in the year number." (Wang Dacheng 'The First Draft of the Fistula of the Crane Ming in the Valley of The Journey of the Bawang Dynasty]) In response to this statement, Weng Fanggang believes: "The attack on the United States was only two hundred years in the year of Wu Renchen and Jia Wu, and it was only two hundred years when he went to Europe and Huang, and it should not be caused by the two gongs and the ancients, causing more differences in evidence." "Fu's "Runzhou Tujing" has been passed down as Wang Youjun's book, and this book was already written by the Tang Dynasty, so how can it be reasonable to attack the beauty of the skin?" For the mourning crane poems and prefaces in Pi poems, Weng Fanggang explains that "when Gaipi and Lu compose poems, they must be familiar with the outline of the ming, so the two are repeatedly used in the passage, and it is not really a matter of Le Ming.". ("Fistula Ming Is Not Out of the Late Tang Dynasty")
In recent years, the study of the "Fistula Crane Ming" has aroused the interest of all walks of life, mostly in favor of Tao Hongjing, but also Wang Xizhi, Pi Rixiu and even the Middle Tang Dynasty anonymous. At present, it is still in the stage of expressing one's own opinions. If we can make efforts on the basis of the research results of our predecessors, and make efforts in distinguishing between differences and identities, additions, and corrections, the mysteries contained in the "Crane Ming" can be revealed. (Yin Guangzhong)