laitimes

Freedom is not freedom, and one should be pure oneself

Freedom is not freedom, and one should be pure oneself

Chang Yu "Sleeping Beauty"

Hello wow, I'm Xiaofang, and I'm still reading Kazuo Inamori's book "Living Law" today.

Kazuo Inamori mentions a point:

"As a human being, whether it is right or wrong, good or bad, whether it can be done or not, these morals and ethics that restrict people's behavior should be copied unchanged to run the enterprise."

My question is not running a business, but the ethical concepts we have followed for so long must be correct. Like loyalty to a loved one? Especially in recent years, the liberation of sexual concepts, the cost of trying to get a sexual partner has been greatly reduced. I've been thinking about this lately.

In the book "Becoming Beauvoir" that I read earlier, I talked about the emotional state of Beauvoir himself. Beauvoir was in a romantic relationship with the existentialist philosopher Sartre, and in addition to that, they each had a lover. Beauvoir and Sartre's respective lovers also maintained a romantic relationship with each other, which is not an ordinary love triangle, but a polyamorous love.

In the beginning, I thought it was free and romantic. Think of being able to follow your own nature, no longer limited to one person, but also in touch with other people who are excited. Both lovers are also very free, just perfect. But the further back she looked, she saw that Beauvoir was so tormented by her lover's relationship that it even affected her own full-time job, that is, her exploration of philosophy.

In addition, he made a mess of his original strong relationship with Sartre. Acts such as abusing private rights to seek the welfare of my lover and students constantly impact my three views. It seems that once this polyamorous relationship begins, it will develop in an uncontrollable direction, and your bottom line will continue to be impacted. By the time you come back to God, you have done a lot of things that make your conscience uneasy, not to mention the worldly vision.

The answers that my book friends gave me completely eliminated my confusion, posted here, to share with you:

"Freedom is unfreedom, it is the kidnapping of genes, and the reason why it is not advocated by values is that it is easy to make people go to self-destruction, because it is easy to accompany lies, it is easy to make people drift farther and farther away from purity, not everyone will be like this, in many people it is easy to go in the direction of wandering outside the rules."

Social people can't always live in the pleasure of nothingness, people always have to return to the rules, illness, habitual betrayal, and the lack of scruples about romance have a large proportion of most people deviate from themselves.

Freedom is unfree, and one should be pure oneself."

If you feel that today's sharing has helped you, give me a thumbs up and give me an encouragement. In addition, you are welcome to share your thoughts in the comments section~

Read on