At about 21:00 on October 7, Mr. Wei was driving a car on the yanjiang road east of the Jinglan Bridge, when suddenly a pet dog rushed over, he could not brake, hit the dog, the pet dog was frightened, and quickly ran away.
At this time, the owner of the pet dog, Mr. Li, stepped forward and asked Mr. Wei for compensation, and the two sides had a dispute. "Your car hit my dog!" "It was your dog who hit my car, and the bumper of my car was broken!" The two blamed each other, both believing that the other was responsible. In desperation, Mr. Wei had to call the police for help.
The police of the Liudong Patrol Brigade came to the scene. The inquiry learned that before the incident, Mr. Li took his pet dog out to play, and he put the dog on the pedal of the two-wheeled electric vehicle and went on the road without a leash. On the way, the pet dog suddenly jumped off the pedal of the car and collided with Mr. Wei's car.
After understanding the situation, the police criticized Mr. Li's behavior of not taking good care of the pet dog, which was also the main reason for the accident, and the pet dog could not run around on the highway, and Mr. Li should bear the responsibility for the accident. After patient mediation, Mr. Li realized his mistake and expressed his willingness to compensate Mr. Wei for the loss of his vehicle.
In the end, the parties reached an agreement through negotiation on their own, and Mr. Li compensated Mr. Wei for 500 yuan for vehicle maintenance costs, after which the two parties could no longer pursue the relevant legal responsibilities of the other party, and Mr. Wei expressed acceptance. The dispute was resolved to avoid further escalation of the conflict.
such events,
This is not the first time it has happened in Liuzhou
▼
On the afternoon of November 30, 2018, at the intersection of Shengli Community on Shengli Road in Liuzhou City, a small car drove into the community and accidentally crushed an English bulldog worth 20,000 yuan. The police of the 110 Police Squadron of the Liubei Patrol Brigade rushed to the scene, and after learning about the incident process, they believed that the owner of the car was not responsible in this matter, and if the dog owner had objections to the mediation proposal, he could make a claim through legal procedures.
Why did the police make the judgment that the owner did not need compensation? Because the police determined that the owner of the car was not at fault. After on-site investigation, the police confirmed the incident process, because the dog owner took the dog out without a leash, and let the dog leave his control range, and the road is not wide, there is a certain blind spot when the car turns and enters, the size of the dog is not large, and it is more difficult for the driver to notice that there are dogs that have run out. Therefore, the police claim that the responsibility for the accident lies with the dog owner, and the owner is not at fault and does not need to compensate.
Dog keeping is a personal freedom
But dog lovers
Relevant regulations should be consciously observed
Strengthen the awareness of raising dogs according to law and civilized dogs
The result of the processing of this event
It should be said that it is reasonable and legitimate
For regulating dog breeding behavior
It has a certain positive guiding effect
To this
What do you think?
Source/All-Media Reporter Fan Zhen Correspondent Luo Liujun
Review/Lin Xiong Editor/Lin Zhe Proofreader/Chen Haijun
The copyright belongs to the original author, if there is any infringement, please contact to delete
News breaking telephone: 18977221234; promotion and cooperation contact information: 17307722632 (WeChat same number)