The projects that can enter the national competition are not weak brigades, masters are over-the-top moves, and they fight not only internal skills, but also them...
Today, the author invited Fan Jian, director of the Yangtze River Delta Secretariat of the Expert Committee of the China Education Innovation School-Enterprise Alliance and an expert of the China "Internet +" College Students Innovation and Entrepreneurship Competition, to teach everyone the experience of participating in the national competition.
There is a reason for starting a business
Many college students always feel very abrupt when talking about entrepreneurial projects, not talking about what they are good at, not talking about what kind of resources they have, not reflecting the disciplinary advantages of their schools, not talking about geographical advantages, and it is difficult to get the appreciation of the judges.
Therefore, college students must first talk about the reasons for starting a business, and there are reasons to appear that the entrepreneurial project is real, it is thought through, not to join a certain field in a daze, nor to jump out of the stone crack for no reason.
What are the reasons for starting a business?
• Geographical advantage
• Capacity advantage
• Disciplinary advantages
• Advantages of personal resources
Entrepreneurship with a reason can highlight the advantages of the project and convince the judges.
The story should be sharp
Participating students usually ignore a problem, that is, they are too familiar with the project, so that in the process of telling the project, some of the content is only made up in their own minds but not told, and what the audience hears is not complete, so the content must be repeatedly practiced and polished, and the key points we want to express can be fully expressed.
Therefore, in the national competition judging, in order to obtain high scores, in the telling of the project, the story must be sharp and complete, highlighting the key materials.
The logic should be smooth
In the "Internet +" competition measurement standards, business logic accounts for a large proportion, so our requirements for business logic will be higher.
Here are 2 points on business logic, one is innovation, the other is sharing.
• Innovation
Innovation, innovation contains many aspects of the content, such as technological innovation, product service innovation, business model innovation, marketing means innovation, etc., not necessarily subversive changes, can be cut from a small point, the small innovation and development into others incomparable advantages.
• Sharing
Sharing is a spirit of the Internet. In the traditional way, information is easily monopolized, so the more information people will appear more authoritative.
In the "Internet +" era, the biggest revolution is information sharing and generating value.
The competitiveness of an organization is also related to the degree of information sharing, which requires us to synchronize as much information sharing as possible, and then obtain this kind of collaboration between group acquisition partners and external partners to enhance our competitiveness.
This is the biggest difference between the spirit of the Internet and the traditional traditional management model.
The synchronized spirit of information sharing on the Internet can enable an organization to burst out more competitive than before.
Support should be strong
If the "Internet +" competition project does not have substantial material support, it may become a bragging contest.
Therefore, in the preparation of the project, the supporting material is an important content, and it is necessary to prepare very powerful materials and speak with facts.
• Data
The data should be objective and true, and it can come from third-party authentication, user feedback, or from the final report paper.
• Patents
This is a strong support that can prove the real progress of the project, and with the blessing of the patent, it can not only show how we think of it, but also tell the judges how far we have achieved it.
The game should be summed up
Summary is a problem that almost all participating teams will ignore at present, and the end of the game is not summarized, and the summary is not done in time.
The game should be summarized and reviewed in a timely manner. On the one hand, the scene was restored, recalling what questions the judges asked, whether the answer to this question was appropriate at that time, and whether there was a better answer.
On the other hand, according to the questions of the judges, think about the original intention of the judges' questions, think about the future development of our project, and strengthen our original intention of starting a business, so that we can have more confidence and the team is more tacit.
The national competition is just around the corner, and I hope that the small partners through the provincial competition can learn lessons and obtain satisfactory results in the national competition.