Foreword: Many fresh graduates like to ask these few questions, is the foreign company Adecco a foreign company? Is od outsourcing? Today, the author will borrow this melon and explain it to you in detail.
What is od?
od = outsourcing dispatcher, which literally means "outsourcing dispatch staff", is lower than Chinese "manpower outsourcing", didn't you expect? The word used to the extreme this year is the "protagonist" in today's article - foreign company Deco.
Huawei's od is equivalent to its own original reputation of outsourcing to stink, so it engaged in a set of English alphabet combination model, making the pretentious "Huawei x foreign enterprise Deco joint high-end recruitment", although it seems to be improving the forced qualifications, but the actual soup does not change the medicine.
For example, I don't believe you go to the boss directly to ask those hospitable Huawei big brothers and sisters who take the initiative to take care of you, you ask them what the full name of the od is, the author can bet that they dare not tell you that it is outstandingdepartment (Huawei reserve, outstanding to take pending meaning, not excellence).
They only dare to secretly change the concept to tell you that from the foreign company Decood can be turned into Huawei. But the author also wants to tell you here that the channels for outsourcing to the regular army have always existed, whether it is the current ChinaSoft and so on, as well as huitong in 2006, the routine is exactly the same, there is no novelty. Now many old Huawei employees, two books and three degrees are outsourced to turn positive, of course, you ask them how od, they will definitely blow od how good, because of the grateful heart.
And the foreign company Deco declared the positive rate well, the author advises you to pay more attention to it, those hr for KPI from 1% to 20% dare to blindly promise, you see the recently announced, almost 10,000 people, successfully turned a few. People Deco Mamma Mia don't care about this, just earn your head's money. Deco and Huawei once a year signed, dissatisfied will return to Deco, the badge all day with Huawei, there will be adversity on it. To say more, the "foreign company" of "foreign company Deco" is similar to the country name of North Korea, what is missing in the fate is to take what name, the values are similar to Apple, Google those foreign companies are similar to each other, when you should be fired hr is similar to the village and town enterprises, how ugly to talk about how ugly it is to hear, and even the bones that you eat are not left.
Well, without further ado, eat melon!
This is a melon that the author found yesterday in the judgment disclosed by Qi cha cha, which is very interesting.
Foreign company Adecco added 10 new labor arbitration disputes on the 29th, and all labor disputes are the same point, employees received a "notice on the dismissal of u-tech employees" in the email, do not know what kind of notice this is? In such a notice, a number of Adecco employees were sent to the second trial, and this melon is still worth eating.
Adecco explains this notice as follows:
1. Customer commissioner Chen Mou, because he has just joined the company and does not have the corresponding business level and authority, the content of the email sent on January 2, 2019 is ambiguous, which is not the original intention of Adecco, and it is not clear about the legal consequences;
2. The attachment in the email sent by Chen on January 2, 2019 violated the company's printing approval process, which was not the original intention of Adecco, and also caused it to conflict with the subject of the email, so the email intent should be determined by the subject matter of the email. Evidence 2 Chen notified Li of the entry email. Proof: In the email involved in the case, the sender Chen.Li7 is Chen Mouyi, an employee of Adecco. The sender of Evidence 2 is the same person as the sender of Evidence 1. Evidence 3 Chen's "Labor Contract" letter. Evidence 4 Chen mou entered the company's internal personnel system account notification email. Evidence 3-4 proves that Chen joined Adecco on May 4, 2018 and opened a self-service platform account for Adecco employees on May 10, 2018. Evidence 5 Annex I of the Labour Dispatch Agreement: Labour Dispatch Services and Charging Standards. Proof: According to Annex I of the "Labor Dispatch Contract" involved in the case, Adecco Company collected an after-tax dispatch service fee of 350 yuan / person / month.
Who is this customer specialist, Chen Mou? Can you send a full email that is not the intention of Adecco without the corresponding business level and authority, and is not clear about the legal consequences?
Let's see what the employees have to say:
From this content, it can be proved that the sender of the email involved in the case, Chen Mou, is the personnel person in charge of the company and has the right to publish relevant documents on behalf of the company.
After reading the employee's defense, is it interesting?
Let's see what the court has to say:
According to the Notice of Termination of Labor Contract sent by the foreign company Adecco to some employees on January 2, 2019, the intention to terminate the labor contract with some employees was clearly expressed. In the case of a large number of employees laid off by the same employing unit, the foreign company Adecco and the employing unit convened some employees to negotiate compensation and compensation on January 11, 2019 without success, and the foreign company Adecco sent a "Notice on the Dismissal of u-tech Employees" to some employees, including the appellee, that night, expressing that it would jointly negotiate with the appellee to terminate the dispatch labor contract on January 11, 2019, but the notice did not clearly state that the appellee needed to wait for work, nor did it clearly state that the two parties did not terminate the labor relationship Therefore, the appellee had reason to believe that the notice was an expression of the appellant's intention to terminate the employment contract in the circumstances at that time, so the court of first instance found that the employment relationship between the two parties was terminated on January 11, 2019, and the court confirmed it.
Well, the whole incident is basically clear, and I will finally talk to you about "outsourcing".
In recent years, the domestic market has changed, and utilitarianism has slowly replaced technological productivity. Whether things are good or not is not taken seriously at all, and it seems less important, and everyone's focus is on how much things can sell. The market has become competitive not a technology, but a temporary deception of the market. The way to deceive the market becomes: superficial articles, low prices, false advertising, etc. Anyway, there are many leeks, as long as you can harvest a batch of leeks, it is enough to make these fools rich for so many generations. Therefore, domestic enterprises never care about the "long-term" "nothingness", they only care about the satisfaction of controlling others.
Technology is not productivity, so many companies began to no longer maintain technical teams, and the strange industry (outsourcing) was born and began to occupy the mainstream market. Outsourcing occupies the mainstream workplace, there are more and more leather bag companies, and finally it has become today's workplace form, outsourcing companies have made small profits, buried the interests and destiny of a class, and ruined the livelihood of most technical people. Utilitarianism driven by interests stifles the creation of workplace people, and young professionals are "optimized" by the workplace early.
Many people think that outsourcing is to save business costs, and indeed, the author also acknowledges. But what makes it like for us, the scheming capitalists, to be clear?
Of course, the author has talked about the shortcomings of outsourcing, but outsourcing is not useless. If you are not well educated, not from a science class, it is difficult to find a job, or a small and medium-sized city, outsourcing this kind of offer can also go. But if there is still a pursuit of technology, idealistic technicians, do not consider. (Note: The author is not discriminatory outsourcing, after all, thousands of people have a thousand choices)