To be honest, these two days I was thundered by the remarks of a "professor", and Ray's solidity, this idea is probably unprecedented and unprecedented!
How thunderous is this professor's remarks? You can take a look at the following picture: to sum up, it is a sentence, in order to help male friends get rid of the single, it is recommended to promote polygamy.

Seeing the above content, is there a feeling of crying and laughing, polygamous has heard that the product of the former constitutional monarchical society has long been abolished, and what is the ghost of this polygamy? Do you think you can really solve the problem of the current number of single young people? It's ridiculous.
First of all, polygamy, literally means that a wife has multiple husbands, in other words, multiple husbands can share a wife, I don't know what everyone thinks about such behavior, anyway, I am particularly resistant.
At a lesser level, I can't accept other men having intimate contact with their wives, and it is this long-term, and deeper it is a blasphemy against love.
Of course, I believe that there will be some people willing to accept such a setting, after all, there is no surprise in the world, and these people who are willing to take the initiative to accept such a setting, on the Internet we call it "ntr minotaur", which means people who are willing to be taken green hats by others or willing to bring green hats to others.
But such ideas are often seen in multi-person movements, which are judged to be mass fornication under today's monogamous laws.
Secondly, polygamy breaks not only the prohibition of love, but also the ethical problem.
To give me an example: a woman is pregnant, she has 3 husbands, each with different names, so please ask whose surname the child should be born with?
There will definitely be people who suggest that every time you have a child, you should take a DNA paternity test, first of all, I must admit that this method is really scientific, but I still want to tell you that this method is scientific but not effective.
The process is cumbersome, true and false is difficult to distinguish, we can not guarantee that every region will have such a formal institution, please note that it is a formal institution, those who drip blood tests, even if it is not guaranteed that every family is willing to spend time to do such a thing, not to mention that if the child's DNA sequence and several husbands are different, it is not more embarrassing.
But if you don't do it, it is easier to have accidents, a group of women in ancient times can earn their heads and blood for the position of the main palace, a group of husbands for a eldest son, it is very likely to do everything, just like a male version of "Zhen Huan Biography", after all, this is not only related to a man's family status, but also the social status of the entire family behind the man.
Surely someone would say that it would be fair to let the wife have a child for each husband, depending on the age of the family, regardless of size.
Is it fair? wrong! It is not fair at all, at least for this mother, to know that even if there is a wife and many husbands, the wife is always a person, she is not a fertility machine.
In ancient times, polygamy was mostly found in imperial relatives and large families, and each wife only had 1-3 children, and they had enough resources to take care of these children.
But polygamy is different, the wife not only has to give birth to a pregnancy, but also has to work harder and harder to take care of these children, yes, at that time, it is estimated that the so-called full-time wife is more difficult than now.
Coupled with the long-term preparation for pregnancy and childbirth, the body will always be overwhelmed after a long time, which will be a fatal blow to the child and the adult.
This leads to more and more women being afraid to get married.
But what if the wife had only one child, and the child was unfortunately a boy? Then it is obviously not fair for this child.
Especially in the later stage, when facing the support of children for the elderly, a big problem will be exposed: the problem of the elderly's pension.
You must know that even if how to support the elderly under monogamy is now a world problem, not to mention this kind of polygamous and only child situation, that child has to work hard to lift the happiness of many elderly people in their old age on their shoulders!
What is even more frightening is that this is not just a matter of a few plus a few, but how to solve the problem of supporting the elderly under the premise of a sharp increase in the number of people, a decline in per capita GPD, and a price of immobility or increase.
Finally, let's return to the essence of the problem: "in order to solve the problem of the majority of men single."
Let's not say that the solution to singleness here refers to the solution of physical or mental, even if it is true love, then you think that with the policy of polygamy, you can marry Bai Fumei and go to the peak of life?
Wrong, such a policy seems to allow every man to correspond to a woman, but this is only theory.
Under polygamy, boys will be more willing to contact those who are better women, and women will be more likely to choose more excellent men from these boys.
This will lead to another result, excellent women surrounded by a group of excellent husbands, and those who are more average-looking, even counted as dicks, it is estimated that after the implementation of polyandry, even the opportunity to be a spare tire will not be available.
Even if you lower your own requirements again and again, you will find that others have already taken the lead, until finally they will return to the original point, either embarking on the road of no return of singleness, or living with people they do not love for a lifetime, without any interest.
At that point, do you still want sweet love? Do you feel like you've been put together again?
Polygamous, such a whimsical idea, even my 3-year-old nephew did not dare to say, and this professor said so grandiose, is it not that he is the legendary Minotaur chief? He wanted to borrow the meme of solving male singleness, so that his desires in that regard could be embodied, even rationalized?
Of course, all of the above is just a personal speculation of mine, in short, polygamy, which not only destroys the harmony of love and law, but also subverts the entire social system.
So how do you make yourself have sweet love?
Bai Yang once said: Love does not develop according to logic, so we must always pay attention to its changes. Love is not eternal, so it must be constantly pursued.
The first is to understand that instead of discussing how to distribute love, it is better to study how to shape yourself, remember that love is like an opportunity, it is only reserved for those who are prepared, in addition to no matter how many settings, for love itself, it will be a passing cloud.
Second, when you have love, you must know how to cherish love, love is not to buy something to buy belongs to you, it needs your careful care, but also needs your gentle companionship.
Third, when you lose love, do not hate love, know that love is colorless and tasteless, let you feel tired of the person who was in love, rather than the deep body of love, always maintain the vision of love is the most basic respect for love.