Beijing, November 1 (Reporter Ma Haiyan) "The key to breaking the 'five onlys' is to set up a 'new standard', the higher the level of scholars, the more they can use a landmark achievement to reflect their level and as their own academic signboard, 'ten years of grinding a sword' to create first-class achievements and first-class talents, inventory of 'a sword' can make the original results win in time." Liu Yidong, director of the Center for Science and Technology and Society research at the Institute of Natural Science History of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, said.
Breaking the "five onlys" of only scores, only advancement, only diplomas, only papers, and only hats is a hot topic in colleges and universities in recent years. Promoting the original innovation of "ten years of grinding a sword" is the direction of academic evaluation reform. The 5th China Academic Evaluation Summit Forum with the theme of "Orientation, Methods, and Strategies: How Academic Evaluation Reform Promotes Original Innovation" was held on October 31 at Chinese Min University.
Liu Yuanchun, vice president of Chinese Min University, pointed out that in recent years, a number of documents involving scientific research evaluation, talent evaluation, project evaluation, scientific and technological evaluation, and educational evaluation reform have been introduced, laying a foundation for promoting innovative breakthroughs in the fields of research and education in various disciplines, and academic reform should work evaluation orientation, evaluation goals, evaluation methods, and evaluation mechanisms, and the key lies in the combination of breaking and standing.
Wang Hongcai, vice president of the Institute of Education of Xiamen University, said that breaking the "five onlys" is a difficult project, which requires the construction of academic subjects to advance, the need to stimulate the consciousness of subjects, the need for academic autonomy, the call for diversification of evaluation, and the creation of school-running characteristics.
For how to achieve diversified and objective and fair academic evaluation, Zhang Yaoming, former editor-in-chief of Xinhua Digest, believes that academic evaluation of digital humanities is imperative, and evaluation helps to accurately and scientifically understand the status of academic research, which is the key to building a disciplinary system and academic system.
Meng Zhaohai, deputy director of the Office of the National Leading Group for Education Science Planning, stressed that the academic evaluation reform should implement the "four evaluations", focusing on improving the evaluation of results, strengthening process evaluation, exploring value-added evaluation, and improving comprehensive evaluation.
Zhao Wei, director of the Scientific Research Department of the China Institute of Scientific and Technological Information, proposed that it is necessary to comprehensively and deeply implement the relevant policies for evaluation, improve and perfect the talent evaluation system suitable for China's national conditions, and establish a long-term monitoring mechanism.
Professor Yang Siluo of the School of Information Management of Wuhan University introduced the innovative research on academic evaluation oriented to full-text measurement, and demonstrated the improvement of full-text measurement methods on simple quantitative evaluation in the past.
Li Jiangbo, an assistant professor at the Business School of Qingdao University, believes that the evaluation of social science academic books from the perspective of citation content can improve the problems of fewer data sources and high evaluation costs in the traditional evaluation method, and then improve the social science academic book evaluation system.
The forum was jointly sponsored by the Research Center for evaluation of Academic Achievements in Humanities and Social Sciences of Chinese Min University and the Research Center for Science and Technology and Society of the Institute of Natural Science History of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. More than 1,000 people from many units attended the forum online, including heads of scientific research management departments, editors-in-chief of academic journals, library and information experts and scholars, and academic evaluation and research experts and scholars. (End)
Source: China News Network