Before the "living area" big v, the "lexburner" with 9 million fans was banned by the b station has not subsided, and the b station has fallen into the "feminist" complaint storm.
On February 10, Weibo's Video Glasses Network, beauty brands ukiss, Sophie and other brands issued an official statement, saying that the content on the Bilibili website involved insulting women, and because such behavior did not conform to the brand concept, it would cut off cooperation with B station on the New Year's Festival.
This pushed bilibili to the cusp of the storm.
Netizens have been suspicious, they are talking about the new "jobless rebirth" that was previously removed from the shelves due to "technical reasons". And this matter b station is also on Weibo hot search.
In response, station b gave an announcement, which said that it did not want to see everyone caught in endless anger and quarrels, and would increase the intensity of rectification and strictly abide by the "Regulations on the Ecological Governance of Online Information Content" to dispose of the content of the platform.
As an anime up, let me tell you what I think.
If it is said that the original and reprinted content released by the creator has violations and clear inappropriate remarks, the platform is of course obliged to manage the content and conduct strict review. But to be honest, as a bilibili creator myself, the review of b-station is strict in several platforms. At present, I only have a media platform based on the traffic of the picture and text of the Baijia number, and I feel that the threshold can exceed the audit strength of the b station, and other platforms, including today's headlines, will not be as strict as the b station.
B station video review is almost accurate to the frame, for example, I previously turned a "magic record magical girl small circle" transformation screen, only so few frames are a security pants shot, just a few frames of the picture, b station review is also however, said this is illegal content, cut off to pass the review. I also passed on an anime miscellaneous, which has several frames of the picture about the heroine in "The Void Realm" with a knife to cut the monster scene, just 1 second, but not review, I think the b station for the content of the review, absolutely strict.
But, "feminism", this thing, is much more complicated. It's a long story.
Most of the anime content imported from China comes from Japan
Click on the "serial animation" of station b, and you can see that nine times out of ten it was imported from Japan. Of course, station b has a national innovation area, but considering this agg culture, that is, from the origin of Japan, I think that whether it is station b or other places that provide copyright anime viewing, there will be a large number of animation or film and television dramas imported from Japan.
However, the creative environment of Japanese animation, Japan's own national conditions, and the consumption direction of the Japanese animation industry have certain differences with the country, so after the introduction of the b station, a large number of deletions have been carried out, and the content that may have a controversy has been marked with dark pasture, or obscured, or even silenced, and the controversial picture may be directly deleted, which is also a place where friends who watch the ban are obvious to all, and they are quite dissatisfied with the b station. Even so, the content of the anime itself may still be in a non-mainstream concept of development, because the Japanese animation itself is not for the public, but for a specific group, so no matter how to delete, the part that cannot be avoided will still conflict with the concept of the mass audience.
However, this is the Japanese otaku culture itself. Originally a non-mainstream culture, it is a niche content.
For example, the famous "fate/stay night" in the circle has a large number of loyal fans, and its animation is indeed a trend of all ages (or may not be all ages to be precise), but its original work is a 18x game, so you say that as a fan of this work, the possibility of understanding the original work is very large, so is it a wrong orientation for the platform to introduce such a work? No, it itself is not promoted according to all-age works, even CCTV6's film reviews also mentioned, "Fate HF" is a typical fan-oriented movie, he himself has his audience, so the platform introduction, attract fans to watch, I think there is nothing wrong with it.
The other is that bias and double standards are very serious. Some popular network dramas, TV series, the plot obviously appears in the behavior that does not conform to the concept of today's modern people, such as depicting the three wives and four concubines of feudal society, men are happy, but have you seen the audience will say that "men open a harem" Is there a problem? Then when it comes to the animation, it becomes "three views are not correct", the animation is only fiction, he did not say that its background is not the background of the ban era, and there is no need to completely relate to reality to ask for the content of the work with the concept of reality.
Finally, the content is complained about, whether there is a problem with the platform, or a problem with the content itself, or a problem with the responsibility of the guardian. Let's take an analogy. The child went to the movie theater, watched a detective movie, there was a murder scene, the child watched and said that it could not accept the very bloody, the family wanted to complain to the movie theater that the movie theater spread blood, do you think the film is too bloody, or the movie theater did not prompt the audience, or the parents did not take care of the responsibility of the child?