Musk angers the United Nations:
Donate 6 billion no problem, take the bill!
Text | Foggy barricads the river
（01）
The two fought online, and netizens around the world were surprised.
The first player to appear was senior United Nations officer David Beasley.
David's United Nations Food Agency won the 2020 Nobel Peace Prize, and it was he who went to the scene to eat and receive the prize. So he's a Nobel laureate.
The second player to appear, Iron Man Musk.
Musk is currently the richest man in the solar system, with assets of 1.47 trillion yuan.
Suppose you are a money-making genius, daily gold, net income of 100 million per day, then you only need to earn 50 years, from youth to gray hair, holidays do not rest, in order to earn Musk this number.
So David Beasley called out to Musk to the effect that:
Pony, are you very draggy, very rich, you make $36 billion a day. However, Comrade Musk, you can't patronize and make money, just forget the original intention, a person to make money is not called the skill, leading the people of the world to run a well-off, is your duty. As long as you spend one-sixth of the money you make in a day, $6.6 billion, you can solve the problem of the world's poor. Please Ask Comrade Musk to touch his conscience and answer me: Are you willing?
If you want, I'll go over and get the money now, ok?
David posted, the world was shocked.
Public eyes turn to Musk: Comrade Pony, if you refuse, won't your conscience hurt?
（02）
Musk responds: I do — but ask Brother David to explain, how do you solve the world famine with $6 billion? And publish the money account, you explained clearly, I immediately sold the stock.
Musk
Musk's response, a needle hidden in the cotton, has two meanings:
First, he was suggesting that the United Nations was not clean.
The United Nations is also made up of people, and people have selfish intentions. Previously, the United Nations took an unknown amount of money, saying that it was to solve poverty, but it could be solved in the past, except for the United Nations officials and a few local officials who were rich, and everything in poor areas was the same.
There is a saying in the United States: If American officials are not corrupt, they will go to the United Nations if they are corrupt.
Because the United Nations doesn't have a superior inspection department, you put money in your pocket there and no one knows.
Second, Musk cried poor.
Musk said that selling stocks means that although he is the richest man in the world, he does not have much cash, but the amount of assets is large. And the value of assets is floating, today is 1.47 trillion, tomorrow is a loss of 1.47 trillion, you suddenly ask him for 6 billion, his family does not have a printing machine, can not take out.
In response to Musk's request to open the accounts, David did not respond positively, but called on the people of the world to unite, arm in arm, shoulder to shoulder, and face difficult challenges together, and the problem of poverty will be overcome.
Then Musk sent a seven-step poem by Cao Zhi in the Tang Dynasty:
Musk's meaning is very clear: everyone is mixed up, who does not know who? Why bother with each other?
（03）
U.N. officials forced Musk to donate money, involving several issues:
First: UN officials force donations, right or wrong?
Some people say that to solve the problem of poverty, we cannot expect the wool of the rich, and it is better to teach people and fish than to teach people to fish, and it is necessary for the local people to actively take action.
Whoever says this should slap ten thousand slaps.
The initial condition for a person to make money is that the surrounding environment has money.
The United States has the richest, but poor countries rarely see rich people. It is not that the Americans are genetically special, but that the United States is the world's money-issuing country, and his printing paper is money, and you have to exchange the fruits of hard work with him. Wealth is measured in dollars, and the currencies of countries except the United States are only internal circulation coupons. You can't make money in an environment where there are only internal circulation coupons.
The United Nations is inherently greedy, but it is the Only one who is qualified and capable of helping the poor. If the United Nations wants to help the poor, it must first have money, and the United Nations itself does not print money, but can only find people with dollars in their hands to fight the autumn wind.
David shouting Musk is actually shouting at the United States: Your Dog Day printed so much paper, diluting global wealth, the more waste paper printed by the United States, the more desperate the poor countries are, this is the reason that David Beasley wants to say but does not dare to say.
（04）
The second question, Musk asked the United Nations to open the poverty alleviation accounts, is it very witty?
Witty hair!
It's not just UN officials who like to force donations.
The Rich in the United States are even more masters of forcing donations.
In the early years of Ma Yun's start, Buffett rushed to force Ma Yun to hand over all the money, on the grounds that Buffett wanted to take Ma Yun's money and go to Africa to help the poor. Ma Yun hid in Tibet and was eventually blocked by Buffett, when Ma Yun explained that there are many poor people in China, poorer than Africans. He wants to solve the problem of poverty in China first, and then go to Africa with Buffett to alleviate poverty.
Jack Ma and Buffett
Buffett returned disappointed and never mentioned poverty alleviation in Africa.
Next door to Buffett is the Associated Press, which is the printing press. But he came to China thousands of miles away, and he wanted to take back the few dollars that Ma Yun earned.
No one blames Buffett for that.
Make money, this is how to fool each other, who flickers and lames each other, who is a master.
At that time, Buffett wanted all of Ma Yun, and Ma Yun did not let Buffett open the accounts. Now as long as the United Nations musk has a mere 6 billion, he will make all kinds of troubles and have to rip open the underwear of the United Nations, so why bother?
If I were David Beasley, I would respond to him with a new Tang poem: boiling beans burn bean stalks, beans shouting in the pot, are all a woman, why do you want to cook me?
（05）
The third question is, how can the poor change their destiny?
First of all, there must be fish in the river.
Second, you have to be able to fish.
According to some data, more than 80% of the world's poor are environmentally poor.
It's the surrounding environment, there is no money at all.
When some people see the words "the environment has no money", they have the idea of increasing government investment.
Increase government investment, which works in China, but in other countries, the currency is just an internal circulation coupon, the circulation coupon is just a few sheets, you take this side, there is no more, there is no solution to the problem, you must introduce American investment.
However, the usual pattern of U.S. investment in Africa is to eat up and nibble away. For example, the United States invests $200 million in African countries, which is conditional and must hire American consultants. The damn thing is that the price of the American consultant is dead expensive, he invests 200 million yuan for you, the salary of the consultant you have to pay 250 million, there is a Korean drama "The Day of the Bankruptcy of the Country", playing South Korea encountered economic difficulties, ask the Americans to take the pulse, and then the Americans took the opportunity to collapse the Korean economy, and the Americans fished enough to go home.
It's not that Americans are bad-hearted, change you, know how to make money, watch a bunch of fools jump up and down, you are thick, or can't help but grab a vote at a low level, this is human nature, not character.
So the poorer you are, the easier it is to be slaughtered.
Unless, of course, you can know how to catch fish when you don't have any fish in the water.
（06）
The final question is, how can you learn to make money?
First, making money is a systematic force.
What is systemic force?
For example, a three-legged stool, you think one of the legs is short, want to make it long, then this three-legged stool, will lose balance!
A person's economic strength must be a triangle with his cognition and habits, just as the political, economic and cultural balance of a country is formed.
If a country wants to go from poor to rich, the other two elements must adapt to change.
People are also like this, a person's economic power must be a dynamic balance with his cognition and habits, cognition and habits do not change, economic power can not change.
The second: start from the two aspects of cognition and habit.
You can't make money without the environment, which is normal.
But if the environment is not short of money, but you can't earn, then you have to consider opening up your own cognition and habits.
People with insufficient cognition will selectively support one side when they see Musk fighting UN officials, but in fact, there is no difference between the two people, they are both strong, there is no good or bad right or wrong. You have to see these things clearly, no longer emotional, no longer so easily provoked, and at the same time form self-disciplined living habits, you can't see anything at first, but slowly, your whole person is adjusted to the same frequency as wealth.
The third, most important cycle.
Experienced fishermen, winter is not idle, to repair the net, observe the climate, to do a lot of preparations, once the spring warm river opens, he is the one who catches the fattest fish.
People with insufficient cognition will regard making money as an immediate state. Everyday I lie flat, wait for you to pile up the money over, I come over to earn, ok? But making money is not like that, the first money you make when you're 20 years old, the harvest is the habit you developed when you were 10 years old. You make your first big buck at the age of 30, and what you gain is the recognition of your 20 years old. If you don't make money today, you paid for the slack or cognitive deficiencies of 10 years ago, and if you don't act now today to improve your cognitive habits, then ten years later you will complain again – provided that the amount of capital in the environment has always been abundant during these 10 years.
So the question for today is:
Some people on the Internet said that Maslow soared Chinese poetry, not that he and David quarreled, so why do you analyze why he wanted to soar Chinese poetry?
(*The picture in this article comes from the Internet)