Entry, entry; boundary, in this case refers to the other party's field or situation. If it is explained in vernacular, I think it can be directly translated as not to be too anxious when entering the territory of the other party.
The sentence "Entering the boundary should be slow" has a fairly strong conclusiveness, and the main stage of application is in the layout or sequence. So where is the basis for its conclusions, and what harm will it be if it violates the principle of slow entry into the boundary, which deserves our serious study and consideration.
I have a few amateur chess friends who know each other well, and in their games, they often see this situation. In fact, their appearance or field efficiency is very high, and they can compete with each other, or even be in an advantageous position. But as soon as he saw that the other party also had a lot of space in business, he immediately became jealous, ignored it, and immediately broke into it.
The result of such a forced entry under the heart is often not too good, or it is deeply under siege and completely annihilated by the other side. Or they are attacked and throw away their armor and are in a terrible state. Even if you are lucky enough to get out of danger, it is likely that your original wealth will be affected and destroyed. Obviously, this kind of entry is not cost-effective.
This type of bad chess is what we often call "hating emptiness"
Hating the void is one of the easy mistakes that low-level chess players make, and if chess players can keep in mind the four words of slow entry, I think, we can avoid the above tragic scenes from appearing too much in the game.
Before making a decision to break into the other side, please be sure to look up to see if there is any empty place on the chessboard, in the layout, the more empty the place is more valuable, which is the truth in most of the time. As long as you master this little trick, you should be able to avoid a lot of mistakes.
From the mentality of entering the other party, the starting point is that it is unwilling to let others have it. But in making this decision, did we seriously consider what we would lose when we didn't want others to have wealth? Do we gain more or less than what we lose? In fact, many times we will forget that as long as we can have a little more than the person on the other side of the chessboard, we can't win this game of chess.
Sometimes I think, if I can think more about the principle of entering the world slowly in ordinary times, then will the chess we play, and even the life we live, be closer to the natural realm?
The answer to this question may be worth thinking about with me.
Author: Wang Yuhui Professional Seven Duan, founder and CEO of Aiqi Dao.