"Director Please Advise" Gunpowder flavor is stronger than imagined, the first work battle, Li Chengru angrily criticized Xiang Guoqiang: the new director has no novelty, but it is a pity niu Junfeng's acting skills. The "Three Teachers" review is as sharp and sharp as ever.
Director Xiang Guoqiang is a typical "academic school" and is good at "modern black humor", and the producer is full of expectations for his adaptation of "Nezha Noisy Sea". However, Xiang Guoqiang unexpectedly lost to Bao Bell, and it turned out that the market is the only measure of the director's ability.
Xiang Guoqiang's "academic school" theory is "unclear and powerful", claiming to use the most novel "director's language" to remake a modern version of classical themes and tell a story about contradictions and reality.
However, the story of "father-son affection" is a bit confused, and even a little bit incomprehensible at the beginning, whether it is the narrative structure, the lens language, including the story core, it is a bit abrupt, and even a little "flowing account" visual sense.
The protagonist played by Niu Junfeng is strange in character logic, and the boss is beaten and beaten, but it causes the bathing center to close. The funniest thing is that the "melon-eating masses" watched for half a day, but finally found that they had watched a "legal propaganda film."
Moreover, Xiang Guoqiang's mirror operation technique is also very strange, and the whole process is chaotic and even makes the audience a little dizzy. In short, the plot of "Nezha Noisy Sea" is abrupt, the theme lacks soul, the picture texture is not as expected, and the traces of rush work are obvious.
Hao Lei's gentle comments: The front is very flat, the back is inexplicably "hi", the shooting uses a large number of moving shots, including handheld shooting, the editing techniques are also very rich, the flower work is too much, the tone is not uniform enough, a bit of stream of consciousness.
Xiang Guoqiang immediately "theoretically justified", claiming to want to jump out of realism and strengthen dramatic conflicts. Fang Li said bluntly: I don't like the theme of "father-son affection", but the protagonist fights for love, and the works whose form is greater than the content cannot withstand scrutiny, and there is no emotional basis and no soul.
Wang Jing helped add: This kind of theme is actually very "old", many of the "Hong Kong films" in the past are this kind of theme, and the black humor comedy is not funny.
Unexpectedly, Xiang Guoqiang once again forcibly defended himself, thinking that the theme of the work was very deep, but the audience could not understand it. There are even so-called "academics" who stand up to help speak, and publicly question the producer's judging criteria are a bit double-standard.
Li Chengru couldn't listen to it anymore, and his sharp comments were very enjoyable. "Sanru Teacher" angrily criticized Xiang Guoqiang: the director does not need to argue too much, because the audience's eyes are snow bright, the shooting method imitates "crazy stone", and the plot refers to the past Hong Kong films.
Li Chengru continued to angrily rebuke: the new director has no new ideas, so good actors help to support the scene, but it is a pity for Niu Junfeng's acting skills. Li Chengru's firepower was in full swing, and Xiang Guoqiang, who was as clever as a spring, was also stunned to the point of silence.
Xiang Guoqiang's loss to Bao Bell is enough to prove that the market is the only criterion for testing works. However, Xiang Guoqiang still adheres to the purity of the "academic school", and the works that he thinks are good need time to prove, as long as some people can understand it.
The "melon-eating masses" hit the nail on the head: using time to prove it is actually a "false proposition", because the first time I feel disliked, I will never go to see it a second time. Indeed, if the "academics" do not know how to cater to the market, as always, they are confident and modest, and it is easy to enter the blacklist of investors.