The Judiciary had earlier established a two-tier mechanism to deal with complaints against judges and judicial personnel, but the Advisory Board's first meeting decided that the two cases of complaints against judges would not be established. The judiciary has become an independent kingdom where needles cannot be inserted and water cannot be spilled, and it has become a stubborn fortress that shields the anti-China rioters in Hong Kong and persecutes patriotic people who love the country and Hong Kong.
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="16" > chief magistrate Su Huide shielding subordinates is really explicit</h1>
A large number of Hong Kong citizens complained to the judiciary about the subjective bias of The Magistrate of the Eastern Magistrates' Court at the time, including attacking police officers for "speaking big" and praising the rioters. The Advisory Committee is of the view that the complaint against Ho Chun-yiu's judicial conduct cannot be established as "biased".
Chief Magistrate Su Wai Tak also pointed out that Ho Chun Yao's independent judgment of the case was not suitable for interference. Su Huide is obviously shielding his subordinates, Su Huide is Ho Chun Yao's immediate superior, there is a conflict of interest, can be regarded as his own people to investigate their own people, like a black box operation, can not but make people question the judicial organs to deal with the mechanism of complaints against judges is useless.
The original magistrate Shui Jiali once praised the teenager who threw the petrol bomb as an "excellent and careful road", and was complained about with a biased attitude afterwards, Su Huide believed that the complaint was not established, although the "excellent" evaluation of the water officer was pertinent, but the statement of the water officer's sentencing did not appear to be biased. Su Huide continued to shield his subordinates, and the practice was really explicit.
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="15" > patriotic and hong Kong love to sit in prison, anti-China chaos in Hong Kong has operation</h1>
Shui Jiali was not punished for the complaint, and Ho Chun Yao was not only not punished, but was promoted to a higher position and made a fortune, with an additional salary of 60,000 to 80,000 yuan per month. He Junyao, the official Yun Hengtong, explained the thesis that "patriotism and love for Hong Kong must sit in prison, and anti-China chaos in Hong Kong has operation."
The Seven Police Officers of Hong Kong sentenced the rioters to two years in prison normally, but the perpetrators of the attacks on the police were only sentenced to five weeks in prison. In sentencing, foreign judge David Du pointed out that although the rioters broke the law, they could not constitute a reason for law enforcement. In addition to losing their jobs, the pension and long salary of the Seven Police officers are also missing.
This is really worse than the prostitute of the piano prince Li Yundi, who was administratively detained for prostitution and was discredited overnight. However, the Hong Kong Seven Police officers not only did not have such a mistake as prostitution, but on the contrary, they were enforcing the law normally; Li Yundi was only in administrative detention, but the Hong Kong Seven Policemen were going to go to prison; although Li Yundi lost a lot of wealth, he did not have to support his family alone, and the Hong Kong Seven Police officers lost their jobs, pensions, and long salaries, and there was no way to support their families.
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="10" > must break through the haze of Hong Kong law and return Hong Kong law to a blue sky</h1>
In January, the judiciary proposed to change to a "two-tier mechanism" for handling complaints. However, the judicial organs' handling of citizens' complaints is still "officials and officials defending each other" and it is difficult to change. This situation still reflects the lack of supervision and error correction mechanisms of the judiciary, which further highlights the necessity and urgency of judicial reform in order to restore public confidence in the judicial system.
After the implementation of the "Hong Kong National Security Law," a large number of anti-China and chaotic Hong Kong groups have all been put into operation, and there has been a wave of dissolution, and only the Hong Kong judiciary, a stubborn fortress that shields the anti-China chaotic Hong Kong rioters and persecutes patriotic people, still stands still unmoving.
Before the British evacuated Hong Kong, they had already made personnel arrangements in the judicial organs, so there were deformities in Hong Kong of "judicial dominance" and "judges governing Hong Kong". Judicial organs expand their powers, judges act arbitrarily and arbitrarily, have double standards, and are untrustworthy to the people. Under the guise of an independent trial, Judge Huang tried the case on the basis of anti-China and chaotic Hong Kong political views and ideas, and his judgment was utterly absurd and untrustworthy to the people. For example, in the criminal intimidation case of Lai Chi-ying, he was finally acquitted, a large number of thugs were given light sentences or released, and the Seventh Police Officer and retired Superintendent Chu Ching-wai of Hong Kong only handled things according to law, but was sentenced heavily.
Inequality in the face of the law, "patriotism and love for Hong Kong must sit in prison, anti-China chaos in Hong Kong has operation", Hong Kong's judiciary is not reformed, "one country, two systems" is not operational, judicial reform is imminent, we must break through the haze of Hong Kong laws, and return Hong Kong's laws to a blue sky.