Text/Junjian
China is a country that insists on "not using nuclear weapons first", but China's normal defense development has always been brought out by Western countries with ulterior motives. Recently, the United States has been pretending to make similar commitments, and as a result, a number of allies have fallen to their knees and begged the United States not to do this.
(Western media hype China to "launch hypersonic nuclear bombs")
According to media reports, the United States intends to issue the Nuclear Posture Review report as soon as possible, and the Biden administration plans to reflect the principle of "no first use of nuclear weapons" in this report. Because Biden also claimed that nuclear weapons exist only to deal with nuclear strategic attacks when he ran for the presidency of the United States, it is believed that U.S. nuclear policy may be loosening. Previously, the United States also sent a questionnaire to allies to ask for opinions on this aspect. As a result, France, Germany, Britain, Japan, Australia, and other countries have been terrified, and these countries are worried that once the United States decides not to "preemptively strike," it will be a "big gift" to China and Russia. As a result, these countries are now persuading the United States to "take back the biden administration."
(Biden)
Don't look at this drama like a decent performance, but when you think about it, you always feel that something is wrong, if the United States really wants to promise "not to use nuclear weapons first", then why should it "inform its allies"? In fact, the United States had similar ideas during the Obama era, and the result was that it was not eliminated because of the opposition of its allies. The United States appears to be deliberately creating the illusion that it will not commit to "no first use of nuclear weapons" because a number of allies are lobbying. Therefore, the United States has no choice but to "reluctantly" continue to maintain the current nuclear policy, and even the United States may continue to strengthen its nuclear arsenal because of the "demands" of its allies.
(U.S. nuclear warhead)
The U.S. does the same, and its intention to spend $1.7 trillion over 30 years to upgrade its nuclear arsenal is in itself a jaw-dropping result. International reports show that the number of nuclear warheads in the United States and Russia still accounts for more than 90% of the world, and the data released by the Biden administration in October shows that the United States has 3750 nuclear warheads. On the surface, the number of US nuclear warheads has decreased slightly, but the United States is actually exchanging quality for quantity, and the US nuclear trinity, including the next generation of B-21 bombers, Columbia-class ballistic missile nuclear submarines, and future intercontinental missile systems, are all being updated, and the US nuclear warheads are also quietly upgrading, of which the United States will Equip W76-2 low-yield nuclear warheads with active Ohio-class nuclear submarines, which has seriously lowered the threshold of nuclear war.
(U.S. low-yield nuclear warheads put into production)
The United States clamours to change its nuclear policy, which is obviously confusing the public opinion, and of course has the intention of forcing allies to submit. During the Trump period, the relationship between the United States and allies fell apart, Biden needs to re-establish the leading position of the United States, but it is obviously useless to just say good words, Biden knows that allies rely on the military support of the United States, so he simply comes up with nuclear policy to talk about things, which is also forcing allies to express their position, if the allies want the United States to "protect", then they must "obey", and "protection fees" are inevitable.
(Militia of the United States -III)
Recently, the United States and Britain and Australia engaged in a so-called tripartite alliance, the United States blatantly ignored the principle of non-proliferation of nuclear technology, announced that it would support Australia, concocted 8 nuclear submarines, this matter caused a shock in global public opinion. Let me ask you, will a country like the United States, which casually plays with nuclear exports and frantically upgrades the nuclear stick, really insist on "not using nuclear weapons first"? The United States itself does not believe this. The United States has said that Iran is not allowed to have nuclear weapons, but the United States has not yet returned to the Iranian nuclear agreement. Even if the United States returns to the Iranian nuclear agreement, the next US government will not turn its face at will. America's credibility is in tatters, and Biden's plan is nothing more than a politically motivated routine.