In summing up the cross-strait forum, Lei Yuan said that the forum has several major characteristics: It is highly theoretical and expounds the great significance of rural construction from the comparison of farming culture and commercial culture; it is highly practical, from the practice of rural construction in the Republic of China, to the reform of Taiwan's farmland system, to the reform of the mainland's rural areas, and to the rural construction cases of some villages that have made remarkable achievements in the past decade. Such as Mingyue Village, Xinchang Ancient Town, Anren Ancient Town, Xieyuan Village, Qiongyao Ruins in Sichuan, as well as West Lake Li Village in Jiangxi, Xiwan Village in Qinyang, Jiaozuo Qinyang in Henan, and Yangwan Village in Xinhang Town, Anhui Province. In conclusion, Lei Yuan concluded that in order to revitalize the countryside, we must make efforts from the following six aspects.
The first is talent, who is the initiator and promoter of revitalizing the countryside. In ancient times, the village builders relied on the gentry and sages, and the second relied on the scholars who returned to their hometowns. Today's revival of Traditional Chinese studies education is expected to prepare some talents for rural construction.
The second is capital, rural construction and revitalization can not be like the large-scale industry in the city need huge investment, but in the rural construction and revitalization of some infrastructure investment is still needed; there is also the restoration of some cultural heritage such as ancestral halls are also inseparable from funds; and handicraft workshops, although there is no need for large investment, but also need some financial support.
Third, policy and institutional guidance. Rural construction and revitalization not only need correct thinking and direction guidance, but also need to formulate some effective policies and systems around correct thinking, otherwise it will make rural construction and revitalization sloganized or deviate from the correct direction. At present, many places have turned rural revitalization into small towns with large-scale industry as the main content, so that the urbanization road has spread to the countryside in a disguised way, continues to encroach on cultivated land, and creates garbage heaps that cannot be recycled and cannot be turned into treasures, and the result is still destroying the countryside instead of revitalizing the countryside.
Fourth, mechanism. Cooperatives that embody the spirit of the township covenant are a good way to take care of the interests of all parties, serve the peasants, and mobilize their enthusiasm. It can be said that cooperatives are a good mode of production that adapts to rural revitalization with intensive cultivation and handicraft as the main mode of production, expanding the scale and common prosperity, and the full combination of money with money, land and houses, and laborers with skills is fully combined to show their abilities, reduce fixed costs to a minimum, and everyone is a shareholder and a master.
Fifth, technology. The technology mentioned here mainly refers to the handicraft technology with the unity of nature and man and the unity of mind and matter as the guiding principle. Such as artisanal vinegar, wine, tea, soap, and farming and cultivation. Handicraft industry has the role of harmonious nature, harmonious human body and mind, harmonious human and human, so it can continue to develop and has excellent quality. It should be the main production method of human beings in the future. Unless anti-aggression requires the treatment of others in the way of others, the need for technology based on materialism.
Sixth, the right cultural choice. In fact, Chinese traditional culture is what our rural construction relies on, and it should become the leading culture of our rural construction and revitalization.
Lei Yuan in Huixian Building