Original from: oro
Kim, who was removed, was removed again in less than a day after he was reinstated as a professional chess player.
On July 24, a South Korean court rendered a first-instance judgment, ruling that the Korean Chess Court had procedurally violated the law, so it revoked the punishment for Kim Sung-yong. Therefore, from 00:00 on August 7, Kim Sung-yong returned to his position as a professional chess player and submitted his resignation to the Korean Chess Academy by mail at 10:00 a.m., indicating his intention to retire immediately.
However, the Korea Chess Academy did not accept Kim Sung-yong's resignation letter, based on article 78, paragraph 4, of the National Civil Service Law, which states that "those with disciplinary reasons are not allowed to retire." The Korean Chess Academy held an operation committee at 4 p.m. on the same day, and through the deliberations of the committee, unanimously passed the "dismissal of Kim Sung-long".
The reason for the "de-naming sanction" issued by the court of first instance was that the delisting procedure must be in place, so the Korean Chess Court did not file an appeal and restarted the delisting procedure.
The Korean Chess Academy once again removed Kim Sung-yong and made up its mind: "Once again, we will express our condolences to the victims who have been hurt by Kim Sung-yong, and we will formulate strong countermeasures to prevent similar incidents in the future." ”
Kim Sung-yong can request a retrial of the delisting, which will be conducted by the Council of the Korean Chess Academy.
Originally, the plaintiff, Kim Sung-loung, filed a lawsuit against the Korea Chess Academy, which included "cancellation of punishment" and "request for compensation for losses and moral losses". Kim Seung-yong believes that the delisting is an abuse of discretion by the Korean Chess Academy, and that they have publicly re-investigated the report, causing damage to their reputation, so they demand "lost income" and moral compensation.
In this regard, the court held that the expulsion of Kim Sung-roon from the Korean Chess Academy is hardly an unreasonable thing in society, so it concluded that there is no need to compensate Kim For lost income or mental loss fees. That is to say, in this regard, the court sided with the Korean chess court.
But on the other hand, the court canceled the disciplinary punishment of Kim Sung-yong by the Korean Chess Academy on the grounds of violating the law. In July 2018, the Provisional Council of the Korean Chess Academy expelled Kim on the grounds of "damage to the reputation of the Academy and obligation to maintain his image as a professional chess player" as stipulated in the constitution. Kim Sung-yong asked for a retrial, but the Council of the Korean Chess Academy did not agree. In this regard, the court held that "the retrial is a system for the rescue of the victims, but the simultaneous disciplinary and retrial is a violation of the procedure." ”
2018 Extraordinary Meeting Voted to "Dismiss Jackie Kim"
On April 16, 2018, Diana, a foreign chess player at the Korean Chess Academy, exposed the "sexual assault of Kim Sung-yong" on the professional chess player message board of the Korean Chess Academy late at night.
On May 8 of the same year, the Provisional General Association of the Korean Professional Chess Association decided to remove Kim Sung-yong from the Professional Chess Club on the grounds that he was "suspected of sexually assaulting a fellow chess player" and "delayed in making a public statement on the suspicion of sexual assault", thus damaging the reputation of professional chess players.
On July 10, the Council of the Korean Chess Academy issued a final judgment that Kim Sung-yong was stripped of his professional chess qualifications.
(Compiler: Gu Yao)