laitimes

"Math was good in elementary school" is not "obesity"? The main purpose of education to reduce the burden? 1, "primary school mathematics is very good" is not "obesity" 2, many children because of the primary school mechanical brushing problem brushing over, the result of the brain is too simple, too rigid, flexible use is insufficient ability, in the face of junior high school logical reasoning, proof and other issues, many children are at a loss, we often say "stay", "chaos". 3, the main purpose of education to reduce the burden 4, the flexibility of identifying the test questions 4, if you are not very professional, you can simply do this 5, if you are not very professional, pay attention to the teacher, learn the way of thinking, cultivate the mode of thinking 6, five-step thinking method is the scientific method of cultivating the mode of thinking

Many children after middle school, the grades dropped a lot, said that the primary school math is very good, ah, sometimes full score, what about the teacher?

That anxious look, eager to ask me to bring up the child's grades in one night, instead of rushing to junior high school, why not cultivate more ability in elementary school.

Is it true that parents say that "I was good at math in elementary school"?

<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="39" >1, "Math was good in elementary school" is not "hypochutism"</h1>

If a school's math test paper is too simple, just to examine the calculation and basic concepts, and the question type is not flexible, there is no examination of thinking ability, then the score will naturally be good, the whole class score is almost more than 90 points, a full score, such a "good" gold content is too low. Such a volume examines the child's memory ability, and this memory ability can score a full score as long as the same type of question is done several times. Such a good is to be fat, just like a person's volume is very large, walking but whirring and panting, but the physical fitness is very low is the same.

This situation abounds in primary schools.

<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="40" >2, many children because of the primary school mechanical brushing problem brushing head, the result of the brain is too simple, too rigid, flexible use is insufficient ability, in the face of junior high school logical reasoning, proof and other issues, many children are at a loss, we often say "stay", "chaos". </h1>

Moreover, excessive brushing will have serious side effects - stifling students' interest in learning and initiative, thus making students bored with learning.

After entering junior high school, the overall difficulty of mathematics is improved, from the first to the second and third grades of junior high school, the difficulty is a straight line rise, and the addition of physics and chemistry, if there is no learning ability, the score will plummet. Children who score more than 90 points or even full scores in the primary school test have failed too many in the junior high school exam.

Junior high school learning time is limited, where there is time to brush a lot of questions, so the good results achieved by brushing questions before will naturally decline.

So don't be fooled by the score in front of you in elementary school, if you are not sure what your child's ability is, you can find some high-quality questions from key schools to test.

On the other hand, it is "misunderstanding the burden reduction of education" - thinking that the exam only takes some brainless questions is to reduce the burden, thinking that the exam only gives the grade is to reduce the burden, in this case, many parents see the full score or the score is A, and think that their children are learning very well.

<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="47" >3, the main purpose of education burden reduction</h1>

The burden reduction of education should be reduced by mechanical repetitive brushing of questions, minus dull question-type examinations, increase the cultivation of interest in learning, and increase the improvement of ability.

There are many factors in learning mathematics well, the key is to choose the right learning method, always around the development of thinking ability to learn, more precisely to cultivate logical thinking mode, rather than just looking at the score.

Can't be fat, be strong, or be a "lean man with good physical fitness"

If the burden reduction is used as a pretext, and the teaching method is not changed, it is a typical "wearing new shoes and walking the old road", which is really a misreading of the "main purpose of education burden reduction"

Sometimes, the school asks questions for the sake of "the reputation of the school", thinking that all children have good test scores, which means that the teaching quality is high, so that the questions are simple, but once the unified examination is broken, the brand is smashed.

For example, there are two flexible question types in a paper, you look at the children's performance, the average score is between 75 and 80 points, if one such question type is not, the average score can be about 90 points, how big the difference is!!

<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="41" >4, flexibility in identifying test questions</h1>

For example, the knowledge point of "the sum of the two sides of the triangle is greater than the third side" has three types of questions.

(1) The two sides of the triangle are 5 cm and 3 cm, and if the length of the three sides is a natural number other than 0, the third side may be ( ) cm

A 6 cm B 9 cm C 8 cm D 1 cm

(2) The two sides of the triangle are 5 cm and 3 cm, if the length of the three sides is a natural number other than 0, the maximum value of the third side is ( ) cm The minimum value is ( ) cm

(3) If the length of the three sides of the triangle is a natural number other than 0, then the circumference of the triangle is not more than 7 cm, how many cases?

Which do you think is more about ability?

<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="42" >4, if you are not very professional, you can simply do this</h1>

First, a type of question type to do a few questions, consolidate the line.

Second, turn the known into the unknown, so as to train his ability to learn from one another.

Third, one problem is multi-solution

Fourth, children who are not interested in mathematics, parents find some mathematical interest problems to stimulate interest in learning.

<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="43" >5, if you are not very professional, pay attention to the teacher, learn the way of thinking, and cultivate the mode of thinking</h1>

<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="54" >6, the five-step thinking method is a scientific method for cultivating thinking patterns</h1>

The five-step thinking method, which is summarized and refined from my more than 30 years of front-line teaching experience, is both scientific and practical. Children who learn this method improve their abilities very quickly and have staying power.

There have been many children benefiting, many parents have smiled, and many families have found happiness!

Pay attention to Mei Niang, learn the science learning method,

A day early, let the child be freed from the sea of problems and surpass themselves!!!

A day early, let yourself be free from your troubles, and be happy as a family!!!