In the field of war themes, domestic film and television dramas have made many jokes, such as "slingshot hitting airplanes", "hand tearing devils", "crotch hidden mines" and other bridge sections that are divorced from reality, and have been madly complained by many netizens.
In most cases, the audience laughed and the creator was criticized by the state media.
But the war film introduced today is not like this -
Douban 2.2 points, about to catch up with "Dream Showbiz";
The audience's "hatred" of the director has reached the point of gritting their teeth;
Nearly 30 years after its release today, the audience's scolding has never stopped;
The director of the film, Yao Moumou, was originally from the class, but because of this movie, he buried his entire career.
It's about it -
"InuYasha"
The background of the film is that during the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression, after the July 7 Incident began the all-out War of Resistance, the people of all nationalities throughout the country united as one, paid with money, made a powerful contribution, and vigorously went to one place to resist the invaders.
As a special combat weapon, the "military dog" has played a considerable role and has made great achievements in history. One of the most widely circulated is the good story of "Chinese bench dogs defeat Japanese wolf youth".
This "Inuyasha" tells the story of two military dogs, "Great Dragon" and "Little Dragon", who fight together with their masters against the Japanese army.
Originally, this film was filmed beyond reproach, and there are indeed historical facts to examine.
The dog is holding an explosive package and charging into battle, there is a picture of a dog being blown away, and even the skin of the dog's flank abdomen can be seen connecting to the legs.
In 1993, special effects technology was no longer a rare object, and the audience thought that this picture was a special effect.
Moreover, the film is to promote the loyalty and bravery of dogs, how can it be a real shot?
To this day, this is also a "rule" between film and television creators and audiences.
But when it comes to animal plots, the first sentence that will come out of the end subtitle is "This film did not hurt any animals";
This is the minimum respect for life in filmmaking;
You can't kill an innocent life because of so-called art.
But at that time, director Yao Moumou proudly added a sentence at the end of "Dog King": "The animals that die in this film are real deaths."
In this regard, Yao Moumou's explanation is-
"To make the performance seem realistic, we tied a trained military dog with real explosives and ran in front of the camera and was blown to pieces..."
"In order to alleviate the pain of the dog, it is necessary to blow it up at once!"
As soon as these words came out, the whole people boiled over.
To this day, the mention of this director makes people hate the back teeth itching;
Some have called it "the biggest shame in the history of domestic films"
Some people suggest that I make a new anti-Japanese film "The Guide King" about a patriotic director who takes the opportunity to make a movie for the Japanese, and strays a bomb on his body to die with the Japanese.
This Yao Moumou made a TV series 6 years later, which once again ignited the anger of netizens, 1 star brush screen, and the whole people boycotted.
Back to "The Dog King"
In the later interview, Yao Moumou reconfirmed that he personally planned this "sacrifice" and looked quite proud.
And the audience who has seen this movie, how to describe the feelings?
It's like eating a bite of cake, chewing two bites, only to find that there is a fly in the cake
What's even more disgusting is that this fly was deliberately put in by the cake maker.
Such a lowly professional and inhumane approach of a film crew should be scoffed at in terms of the professional ethics of filmmaking.
The dog king in the film, repaying the master, heroically resisting the enemy;
The real director, however, blew up the animal actor with his own hands.
Seriously, this is no different from a traitor.
In the name of praising animals and practicing the "reality" of torturing and killing animals, this kind of behavior is also extremely dirty.
And look at the reason he said: for the sake of truth.
Liu Peiqi was asked, how do you substitute for the character?
Liu Peiqi asked rhetorically, if you play a dead person, do you still have to die?
The words are not rough.
Film and television dramas, in the final analysis, are still fictional.
Dedicated people such as Wu Jing have also said that the bottom line of filming is "as long as you don't die".
It can be seen that actors can be abused, but scenes involving life and death dangers must be thought twice.
The title of the film is "The Dog King", and literate people know that the dog is the protagonist of the film;
But Yao Moumou does not think so, in his eyes, in addition to people, everything on the set can only be regarded as props.
He deploys all the props on the set, controlling their life and death, just to whitewash the "truth" he flaunts.
What we say is true is that the historical facts are true and the evidence is true, don't make things up and insult the heroes;
Yao Moumou's reality is that the picture is real, the killing is real, and the disgusting person is real.
Let's look at the environment of the special effects film in 1993.
In "Jurassic Park" made in Hollywood in the same year, the huge dinosaur head swooped down from the car sunroof, such a shot is not as convenient as you blowing up a dog, right?
Isn't it less real than you?
But I haven't heard of Spielberg traveling back to prehistory to kill a few dinosaurs!
I really don't have the ability to do special effects, so why do you have to shoot this close-up, can't you use gunpowder to bring it? Isn't it okay to blow up some fur?
In 1987, as soon as the Japanese movie "The Tale of Hachiko the Loyal Dog" was released, audiences around the world wiped tears from their sincere affection;
To this day, it has endured.
Is it classic because it's real?
It's not because you're taking pictures so realistically and ingenuity, it's that they have a real heart.
How can a person who ignores life and lacks human concern shoot the true core of anti-war?!
Slippery world!