Text/Rice Sugar says education
This year, most of the make-up course institutions ushered in the "cold winter period", and the subject make-up classes were strictly supervised.
In order to seek a way to survive, some of the make-up classes have transformed into art specialty classes, some have begun to broaden the market, changing the objects of make-up classes from students to parents, and some people have begun to wear "vests" and adopt the form of live-in teachers and nanny-style tutors to provide one-on-one tutoring for students.

Under the double reduction, make-up classes in disciplines at the compulsory education stage are prohibited. The students were happy because of the reduction in pressure, but they "rushed" the parents. However, worried that students' poor grades may be brushed off, many parents have begun to look for a "way out", which is also one of the reasons for the rise of home teachers.
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="6" > the rise of nanny-style tutoring, the monthly salary of residential teachers is 30,000 yuan</h1>
The so-called live-in teachers and nanny-style tutors refer to teachers under the banner of nannies, who not only manage students' trivial matters in daily life, but also provide one-on-one tutoring for students. These teachers often have high academic qualifications, and there are countless graduates of double-first-class famous schools, and many of them are overseas students.
The charging standard of this type of personal training is very high, basically the cost of a month ranges from 20,000 yuan to 30,000 yuan, and such a fee is not affordable to many parents. There are actually few parents who can provide such conditions for students, but this has also aroused the doubts of many parents.
Because this kind of personal trainer presents himself as a high-end tutor and a high-end nanny, he is active in the market, which is not a small challenge for the investigation of the regulatory authorities. Parents believe that if this form of "opening a small stove" cannot be better managed, then it is unfair to most students with ordinary parents.
Education should be done without discrimination, so there is also a need to vigorously combat this nanny-style live-in teacher. The relevant departments also said that they will increase their efforts to strictly manage this part of the personal training, to prohibit tutors that do not meet the regulations, and any situation that affects the fairness of education should not exist.
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="11" > whether home teachers should be supervised or not, netizens bluntly said that they are not in a track at all</h1>
Although most parents with ordinary economic conditions are very opposed to the existence of resident teachers, many netizens said in the comment area that they should not supervise resident teachers. Some netizens said bluntly: "It doesn't matter, people who can afford 20,000 yuan and 30,000 yuan a month are not in the same track as you at all."
To a certain extent, economic strength is equal to educational resources, and students from rich families can get more education and training, and they can cultivate many skills from an early age, which is incomparable to many parents with more general economic ability. Although what netizens say is more realistic, it does reflect a small part of the current situation in education.
However, since the double reduction policy has been issued, the compulsory education stage of the subject category is prohibited to make up classes, and it is also forbidden for any organization or individual to make up classes in the form of tutoring. Therefore, although there will be some difficulties in supervision, the relevant departments will still strictly manage and strive to further ensure the fairness of education.
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="15" > can't improve academic performance without making up lessons? </h1>
The rise of make-up classes has led to dependence on make-up classes
In the years before the double subtraction, the rise of make-up classes led many parents to enter a misunderstanding, other children are making up lessons, then my children must also make up, if they do not make up, they will not be able to keep up. The teachers in the school are not good at class, do not go outside to make up classes, children can not learn anything, this is the situation that parents rely on make-up classes.
Students also have a dependence on the make-up class, and since the teachers of the make-up class all speak, they simply do not listen to it in school. Therefore, the school teachers that parents think did not speak, may be what students say, but in fact, it is just because the students' learning attitude is not correct and they have begun to rely too much on make-up classes.
The focus of education back to school is more effective than the teaching of make-up classes
The grades of students who do not make up classes can also be improved, and the education of the school is the basis for students to improve their grades. The ban on make-up classes also means that the focus of students' learning will return to the school and return to the classroom. Teachers should also continuously improve their professional abilities and impart richer knowledge to students.
Before the double reduction, parents felt that excessive make-up classes affected the physical and mental health of students. After the double subtraction, some parents said that in this way, students will not be able to keep up with their learning, which will affect students' academic performance. But in fact, as long as students correct their learning attitudes and find good learning methods and learning habits, their grades are unlikely to decrease.
I would like to say:
Under the continuous development of education, the number of students participating in the middle and high school entrance examination is increasing, in order for students to have a better future, the state has repeatedly emphasized and committed to ensuring the fairness of education. In the eyes of many people, home teachers may be very normal and may not need supervision, but in the eyes of many parents, it is a manifestation of the uneven distribution of educational resources.
So many parents don't want this to happen. Since the state advocates double reduction, it will naturally vigorously ensure that supervision is treated equally and that education is fair. Subject make-up classes are not allowed in the compulsory education stage, and resident teachers are naturally not allowed to exist.
Today's topic: What do you think about living teachers?