Manipulating the Taiwan issue to suppress China, the Biden authorities have made this article a big deal of renovation and bigger. The latest news is that US Secretary of State Blinken issued a statement saying that "taiwan is supported in meaningful participation in the United Nations system." This means that in the future, there is likely to be a grim situation in which the United States pushes Taiwan to return to the United Nations. In connection with the various acts of the United States on the Taiwan issue in the recent period, it is necessary for us to take an in-depth look at the strategic intentions and tactics of the United States on the Taiwan issue.
From the perspective of principle and strategy, the goal of the US strategy toward Taiwan is already very clear, that is, to use the Taiwan issue to contain China and obstruct China's reunification, so as to strike at the great cause of the rejuvenation of the Chinese nation. On this point, the U.S. authorities have now reached an almost open and honest level. In this regard, the us ambassador-elect to China Burns recently made it clear in his recent speech in the US Senate, saying that "our responsibility is to make Taiwan a difficult bone to gnaw" and "the United States needs to redouble its efforts to prevent Taiwan from being taken back by (China)." In other words, the United States wants to prevent China's reunification, and China's reunification is something that the United States cannot accept.
Under such a strategic goal, the specific policy tactics of the United States are also very clear, which can be summarized as follows:
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="4" > is to give China the political name of "One China"</h1>
Giving China the name of "one China" is not the United States' mercy and grace, but the need to open the door to Sino-US relations in the seventies, and the United States' wishful thinking is to let China have the name of "one China" but not the reality of "one China." Since the seventies of the last century, more than fifty and a half centuries have passed, and the United States still adheres to this strategy unswervingly. Perhaps, in the eyes of the hegemonic rulers, the United States did not withdraw its commitment to "one China" after China's reform, which is already a great favor and charity. To that end, step up now!
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="15" > second is to implement military deterrence in the Taiwan Strait, so that China can only make a fuss about "peaceful reunification."</h1>
For half a century, the US military deterrence against China in the Taiwan Strait has been carried out for a long time, and since 2000, it has begun to deepen and strengthen, and now it has developed to a fairly advanced and comprehensive level. Blinken's statement to "support Taiwan's meaningful participation in the United Nations system" is the latest example. Hegemonic authorities do not allow China to use force to achieve reunification, but can only make a fuss outside of "military reunification." So far, most of China's resources and energy have been focused on "peace and reunification" and has been making unremitting efforts in this regard, but judging from the results, the collusion and provocation of the "Taiwan independence" authorities and the US hegemony have become more and more intense and spreading.
<h1 class="pgc-h-arrow-right" data-track="16" >3, making Taiwan a strategic tool for U.S. control and manipulation</h1>
Soon after the Kuomintang regime fled Taiwan, the island became the "unsinkable aircraft carrier" of the United States in the western Pacific, when the United States deployed a large number of naval and land forces in Taiwan. Later, the US military had to withdraw, and Taiwan was strategically reduced to an isolated island, at which time the United States began to strengthen Taiwan's own military strength to balance the mainland. This was very feasible in the 1970s and 1980s and even in the 1990s, because at that time the level of modernization of Taiwan's armed forces was obviously higher than that of the mainland, coupled with the fact that the mainland's armament was in ruins at that time, there was a scene of singing and dancing and wearing feathers, the smoke of war in the Taiwan Strait had long disappeared below the horizon, and Taiwan's status and value in Sino-US relations had declined sharply, so the United States also had a considerable neglect of Taiwan.
At present, the storm of "strategic competition" between China and the United States has re-emerged, and Taiwan's strategic position and value have skyrocketed, almost to the extent that they can be inhabited by strange goods. Therefore, now the United States has not only to support Taiwan's refusal to reunify, but also to build Taiwan into a powerful strategic fortress, so a large number of military strategic resources are constantly being imported from the United States to Taiwan, and the United States is redesigning and arranging the military strategic map of Taiwan and the Taiwan Strait, and it is necessary to further build Taiwan into a strategic tool that the United States can manipulate and use, and become a very sharp dagger that deters China from acting rashly in China's lower abdomen.
It can be said that at present, the United States is unscrupulously manipulating Taiwan, and the political humiliation and spiritual destruction caused to China by this are not to mention, the torture brought about by this alone is very deep, and people not only have to ask what the United States is doing on the Taiwan issue, how far the interference must go, how strong it is, and whether there is a corresponding bottom line.
On the Taiwan issue, whether China has the courage and determination to break with the United States in a showdown, the author does not dare to speculate. What is urgent at the moment is how China should counter the bad behavior of the United States.
In fact, there is a fierce debate in China over the issue of countering the United States, and some people resolutely oppose it, holding that the United States can only "cooperate" and that the "differences" between China and the United States on the Taiwan issue can only be "controlled" and that conflicts and confrontations should be avoided through "control." Some people simply point their sharp edge at "Taiwan independence" and focus on "Taiwan independence," believing that the United States will eventually "abandon Taiwan" and will "abandon Taiwan" at the last moment, turning Taiwan into an "outcast." Some people also pin their hopes on the US election for a new term; they have high trust in the US general election, firmly believe that the United States cannot do without China, and believe that as long as a US president who advocates friendship with China is elected, not only will the Taiwan issue be solved, but the problems of Sino-US relations will all disappear.
In addition, there are many Chinese but they are very concerned and anxious about the United States' manipulation of the Taiwan issue in this way, and they advocate that China should use all economic, military, and political and strategic means to counter the evil acts of hegemonic interference in Taiwan. But this is indeed a very difficult thing, and it seems to be a bit "want to say that there is, there is no real life; want to say nothing, things are the same." Non-being, non-true being; non-nothingness, non-true nothingness".
It is said that in response to US Secretary of State Blinken's vicious statement, the Chinese departments concerned have once again lodged solemn representations with the US side, hoping that this unprecedented "solemn" killing will soften hegemony and paralyze them, and will enable them to return to the west and whine and mourn in the end of their acts of interfering in China's sovereignty. Obviously, this is not possible, and the final method is also very simple, but it requires determination, that is, the spokesman of the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council pointed out: If the DPP authorities continue to indulge in the dream of "relying on the United States for independence" and "seeking independence by force," and dare to take reckless risks, they will surely suffer a catastrophe.
Note: The author of this article is Zhang Zhikun, a core member of the "Qin'an Strategic Think Tank", which is the original work of this platform, welcome to indicate the source of reprinting, reprinting is an important way to gather network strength.