A named Zhong Shuo, who introduced himself in Chengdu and now lives in Guiyang, does not know whether the gender identity is true, and does not know where it suddenly appeared from such a woman, on a WeChat platform called "Art South", pieced together a so-called literary criticism article entitled "Say No to Guizhou Poetry", and the article began with a self-contradictory remark that "reading and knowing Guizhou poetry is extremely limited, and there is a feeling within the limited, and it is inevitable to be confused. Just don't spit unhappy, whatever. "You don't know much, but you have to say it, so where should you start and what should you say? Isn't it mostly based on subjective assumptions that can be summed up by only a half-understanding, and the conclusions based on subjective assumptions can be reliable, and can they talk about symptoms and ideas? Writing critical articles based on such a foothold should be thoroughly questioned in itself! It is an iron law that there is no right to speak without investigation, and how can you write a critical article that is not obeyed and blatantly disregarded?!
Literary criticism has always been beneficial to the revitalization and prosperity of literature and art, so I forced myself to be patient and continue to read. But looking at it, I felt more and more that my heart was twitching, and my breath was suffocated!
First of all, we don't know who this so-called Zhong Shuo is, what level and qualifications he has accomplished in poetry creation or criticism, and can condescend to point fingers at Guizhou poets in the Guizhou poetry circle, derogatorily trample on them, scandalize and slander, and even say nonsense and nonsense?!
It can be fully seen from the words and sentences she uses when she writes that this person's writing ability is ordinary, and her language attainment is clumsy and low, and she can only be regarded as a crappy three-legged cat kung fu. In order to make the text appear unpredictable, the key point is to create, abuse, and mix words.
Critical essays focus on the fact that the arguments are true and sufficient, the arguments are scientifically strong, and then the arguments that are fully established and completely convincing are reached. What is very infuriating is that the article Say No to Guizhou Poetry asserts that there is no poetry scene in Guizhou, the cultural landscape is vicious, only poetry, fritters, and widows who are obsessed with obscenity, and they are respectively going to be flattering, lying and pseudo-folk. There is no argument in the whole text, let alone what is true and sufficient?! Similarly, the whole text can not see the argument process and argument content of the pieces, and the scientific strength of the argument cannot be talked about at all!! But to make such a barbaric and arbitrary conclusion is not just a criticism and ridicule, it is simply a naked ugly insult!
Well, this so-called critical article is obviously too general and speculative! Its impartiality, fairness, seriousness, solemnity, serious lack of seriousness are self-evident. His remarks and views are undoubtedly a typical example of "a bamboo pole killing a slot of people" in the southwest saying, which is simply full of loopholes! Over the years, there have been many outstanding poets in the poetry circles of Guizhou, and many of the poems they have created are slow to say that in Guizhou, that is, they are quite influential in the whole country, which is an objective existence and vigorous phenomenon for all to see, and the author is like a blind man walking at night, turning a blind eye, and his attitude of deviating from the truth is really breathtaking! The narrow, dark and arrogant arrogance of the author or the person behind it can be seen! But we would like to ask: what is the intention of guizhou poets who are so demeaning, so stigmatized, and so disgusting? Do you want to cause a tragic situation in Guizhou's poetry circles without grass and scorched earth through brutal and brutal suppression?!