Rationally treat Qiao Liang's discourse on unification and revival

The topic of General Qiao Liang's "reunification" and "rejuvenation" remarks has been delayed on the Internet for a few days. The sad thing is that it is not what Qiao Liang said, but 90% of the critical netizens in the major comment areas, for an expert who has exhausted his life's energy to study a certain field, not with a rational and methodical analysis, to refute his arguments and arguments, not to calmly analyze whether his long-winded worries are empty, but to generally adopt the method of insults, sarcasm, personal attacks, and stigmatization... For example: no flesh, no backbone, confession, fear of death, not like a soldier, disintegration of the military's heart, bribed, is a traitor, traitor... And so on, and so on, to the fullest extent that humiliation can be done.

What is a big mistake for a man who studies the military, standing in the situation he has mastered, using his analytical logic, and stating his concerns, but is a purely academic question? Can you be greedy, can you be afraid of death? Before fighting a war, it is normal to only analyze the possibility of success and victory, and not to do setbacks and failure deductions? There are even many people who do not do any analysis at all, just one sentence: two armies meet the brave one wins! What awe-inspiring. If we only emphasize bravery, what is the interpretation of the ancient precepts of "having courage and strategy" and "planning but not being brave"?

Scolding people for "office generals" and "pen pole generals", then I ask you, Zhang Fei scolded Zhuge Liang and would only sit in the Chinese military tent and shake the fan, right? In modern warfare, civilian generals command more battles! The more strategic, the more decision-making, the more civilian. Commanders and fighters who study diplomacy, politics, economics, and even history and culture are important members of the war command center.

Scolding people for being greedy and afraid of death, it is even more impossible to beat the eight rods. In modern warfare, even if the war breaks out and Qiao Liang goes to the front line to participate in the war, there may not be a chance of "death"! Is Qiao Liang's article for personal life and death? Is it afraid that if you are defeated, you will first hand over a letter of surrender to the US imperialists to save your life? This childish argument is simply an international joke!

Is the role of a soldier a war machine that can't think? Moreover, Mo said that war did not require a lot of argumentation and thinking before it broke out, and even if war had already begun, we could not just fight with our heads down without assessing the dynamic changes in the strength of the enemy and ourselves.

Some people say that we have all been waiting for 70 years and preparing for 70 years, when will we have to wait? Then I just want to ask you, 70 years, why has it not been done so far? Why? Why! According to the previous logic, is it because all the people in front of us have become afraid of death, soft bones, and traitors? Whether you can fight or not is determined by the length of preparation time? Is it because someone, a certain group of people, wants to "see the day of unification in their lifetime"?

At present, the international situation is complex, the more tense and complex it is, the more calm it is, the more it is necessary to express different voices and opinions to finally weigh the pros and cons, so as to make scientific and historically tested policy decisions and ensure that if the war is not occupied, the war will be won, or even completely won.

Advise those who disagree, carry forward the concept of the sages "hai na hundred rivers", calmly and correctly, listen to compatibility, seek truth from facts, is to discuss things, return to rational debate, rational thinking! #I'm going to make headlines##Taiwan##统一 #