After the Kaohsiung fire took 46 lives, the latest poll: The "anger" of the people against Chen Qimai has increased by 6 times

According to Taiwan media reports, the kaohsiung city fire in the middle of the city, resulting in the unfortunate death of 46 people, 41 people were seriously injured, and all walks of life carried out reform and discussion on related issues such as urban renewal, fire security inspection, building management and rental housing safety. Kaohsiung Mayor Chen Qimai immediately apologized at the first time and stressed that he had an unshirkable responsibility and that he would bear all the blame. After the fire in the city, Chen Qimai's Internet voice also soared, becoming the core of the discussion of the entire incident.

Chen Guan'an, director of the Youth Department of the Kuomintang, pointed out in a Facebook article on the 20th that although Chen Qimai apologized at the first time, the problem of Kaohsiung Municipal Government's failure to implement public safety management has also attracted high discussion on the Internet. He analyzed that from the perspective of the big data of the Facebook community, chen Qimai's cumulative online voice in the three days of the incident was not far from the sum of the month before the incident, and the impact score was 117056 points and the latter was 148445 points. Judging from the cross-comparison of the keywords "city within a city", "Chen Qimai", "Chen Qimai & City within a city", Chen Qimai covered about a quarter of the Internet discussion in the city-within-city fire incident, ranking first among politicians.

Chen Guan'an continued that Chen Qimai not only increased his personal Internet voice because of the incident in the city, but also the core of the discussion of the people involved in the incident. But is the volume of the discussion of Chen Qimai positive or negative? Chen Guanan found that from the perspective of the "mood anger ratio" of the anger number generated by each hundred mood numbers, the ratio was only 0.55% in the 30 days before the event, but during the three days of the event, it increased by 6 times to about 3.5%; in addition, the anger ratio of the Facebook community discussion keyword "city within the city" was 2.65%, but if the article discussed both "city within the city" and "Chen Qimai", it would grow to 3.74%.

Chen Guanan also pointed out that in simple terms, Chen Qimai's negative voice not only grew significantly during the city-within-city event, but also became a discussion keyword in the mid-city event, making it easier for community articles to appear in the number of anger. From this point of view, although the discussion of the event has gradually slowed down, from the perspective of big data, the community does have a considerable degree of responsibility for Chen Qimai.