As mentioned above, Xiangyang Yicheng, as the core of the Chu State, arrived here before 1000 BC when Xiong Xuan was divided, to 278 BC, when the Qin general Baiqi flooded Yan Yin, and Xiangyang Yicheng was eclipsed in the history of the Chu State.
Bai Qi's plucking of Yin, the historical circles unanimously believe that it is in the modern Jingzhou Ancient Jiangling City. Successive dynasties have continued to recognize Gangneung as the capital of Ying. When someone on the Internet mentions it, they will also be proud. It is said that the history of more than 400 years since the time of King Wen of Chu moved the capital to Jiangling.
The appearance of Chu Ju broke this calm.
The archaeological report of Kinan Castle also confirms this.
The upper limit of the archaeology of Kinan Castle was determined in the late Spring and Autumn Period.
According to the remains of Ji NanCheng and the traces of the surrounding Chu tombs, some scholars have fixed The city of Ji Nan during the reign of King Su of Chu (380 BC). It is believed that The city of Ji Nan was the central part of Chu, and after the disaster of Zhongxi, the king of Chu Su, a large-scale natural disaster occurred in the Chu state and was moved by the Fat Relic.
There are different views here, that The city of Ji Nan should be Nan Yin, which was also the Lan Yin of Chu Juli, which was moved by King Jian of Chu (431-408 BC).
Chu Ju showed that Chu Renyin had never been fixed. Ki nan Castle is also one of the areas in Jingzhou.
Even if the upper limit of Ji Nan City is determined, it does not mean that Jingzhou will no longer find a city earlier than Ji Nan City in other places.
Since the Qu Yuan era was later than the upper limit of Ji Nan City, was Ji Nan Cheng the Emperor of Chu Huai during the reign of King Chu Xiang of Chu?
There has always been a voice in the historical circles that believes that Ji NanCheng ended in white.
Records show that Yan and Yin appear at the same time each time. Later generations believed that Yan only existed as a vassal capital of the Chu state of Ying, and an important city existed.
According to the records of the historical records of the historical records, the King of Chu Huai and the King of Chu Xiangxiang, in the end, were in Yan? Or Gangneung Yin? Or both?
After reading the following, do you have any different views?
Recorded in the Chronicle of the Chu Dynasty
...... Xiang Yue: "No, the neutral king of Yin, it is I who hold the emptiness and act unjustly in the world." Or, "Not really." The king of Yin Zhong, because with his new king City said, 'Give me the eastern kingdom, and I will kill the prince for the king, otherwise, I will establish it with the three kingdoms', but the eastern kingdom will be able to get it. "The King of Qi used his calculations to return to the Prince of Chu. The crown prince crossed the line and became king, for the sake of the King of Xiang. It was a warning to Qin Yue: "Lai Sheji is a god, and the state has a king." ”
Because King Huai of Chu listened to the Qin man Zhang Yi's confused words and was detained by Qin, the crown prince was held hostage by Qi. The ministers of the State of Chu wanted to make King Shuzi king of Yingzhong, but were blocked by Xiang Guo and others. After the death of King Qi, Xiang Guo excused the crown prince Xiong Heng to return to the Chu state as king.
Yingzhong? It should be interpreted as "in the capital city". Which one is it? It must have been King Ying of Chu Huai, and when King Xiang returned from the State of Qi to the State of Chu, he was proclaimed king here.
Eighteen years ,...... To Yue: "Xiao Chen's good shooting goose, Luo Hu, Xiao Ya No Fa Ye, He Zu is the Great King Michiya." ...... The left arm was southwest of Zhao Zhi, and the right arm Fu Chuyan ,......", wanting to provoke the King of Xiang, so he said this.
In the eighteenth year of the King of Chu Xiang, the King of Chu summoned a man who was good at archery, and this person was privately very dissatisfied with the weakness of the King of Chu and said something to stimulate the King of Chu.
Among them, there is a passage: the left arm is according to the southwest of Zhao Zhi, and the right arm is Fu Chuyan.
Yan Yin in this passage? Are there two places corresponding to each other, Yan in present-day Yicheng Zhengji and Ji'nanCheng in present-day Jingzhou' former Jiangling? Or is it simply referring to the present-day Yicheng Zhengji?
Individuals are in favor of the latter.
It is also said that King Xiang of Chu was crowned king of Chu Huai, and that both King Xiang of Chu and King Xiang of Chu were both Yan. One of the messages he gave people did not make people aware that there was a separator between Yan and Yin.
Let's move on:
In the twenty-first year (278 BC), the Qin general Bai Qi pulled up my yin and burned the tomb of the first king. King Xiang of Chu dispersed his troops, so he did not fight any more, and the northeast was defended at Chencheng.
After Bai Qi plucked Yin, burned the tomb of the first king Yiling, the tomb of the king of Chu in Yiling? The Chu people fled northeast to Chencheng (Huaiyang, Henan).
This doesn't mean anything, keep looking
Twenty-two years (King Kao Lie), together with the princes to cut down Qin, unfavorable. Chu Dong migrated to Shouchun, and his life was known as Ying.
Moved the capital to Shouchun (in present-day southwest of Shou County, Anhui Province). Over here
There is a direction word, East Migration Capital Shouchun.
that? Is Shouchun to the east or southeast of Chen Cheng? Which cities are in the east of present-day Huaiyang? Bozhou, Suzhou, Lingbi, etc. To be precise, Shouchun is in the southeast of Chencheng.
Looking at the map, it is more accurate in the east of present-day Xiangyang Yicheng.
Of course, it is also about the east of Jingzhou. To the east is a little further north.
Look further down
Historia
The Thirteenth Chronicle of the White Rising King
Bai attacked Chu, Bayan and Deng Wucheng. The next year, he attacked Chu, pulled out Yiling, burned Yiling, and went east to Jingling.
Pingyuan Junyu Qing is the sixteenth of the chronicles
Bai Qi, a small shaft ear, led tens of thousands of people, xingshi to fight against Chu, one battle and raise Yan Yin, another battle and burn Yiling, three wars and insult the king's ancestors.
Qin Benji fifth
In the twenty-eighth year (279 BC), Da liangzao bai attacked Chu, took Yan and Deng, and pardoned sinners and moved them. In the 29th year, Da Liangzao attacked Chu and took the name of Nan Commandery (南郡).
These records have contradictory points.
The first paragraph: the first year to take Yan, Deng, the following year to take Yin, and then burn Yiling (there is the tomb of the first king), and then to the Jingling (there is the tomb of the ancestor of the King of Chu?). This tomb of the first kings? Where exactly? How many?
The second paragraph: The First World War lifted Yan Ying, and then burned the YiLing, and then burned the tomb of the first king. Among them, Yan Yin refers to Yicheng? Or both? If it's two, what happened in two years, with a war? How to explain it?
The third paragraph is similar to the first paragraph. The South County setting time was given.
Is the above record complicated, or too confusing?
Chun Shen Jun Lie Biography XVIII
At that time, Qin had already sent Bai to attack Chu, taking Wu and Qianzhong Counties, and moving east to Jinling, where King Xiang of Chu moved east to rule Chen County.
The Jingling in the text is said to be in present-day Qianjiangxi, just east of present-day Jingzhou (Jiangling).
From this text, it is extracted that sima qian, the author of the historical record, should have always regarded Jiangling as the capital of Chu, Yanyin, which is the saying of Jiangling
Warring States Policy
Zhang Yi Xiangqin, zhaoju yue: "Chu Wuyan, Yin, Hanzhong, what is more to gain?" "Nothing." "Wu Zhaoju and Chen Yi, what is more?" "Nothing more." Zhang Yiyue: "For the sake of Yi, the King of Chu chased Zhaoju and Chen Yi, please fu Yan, Ying, and Hanzhong." ”
Ancient books are difficult to have punctuation separation, the text of The Yan Yin? It should be read together, and when The ancient texts appear alone, it is not necessarily said that it is a specific Yin, that is, it refers to the Chu capital of Jiangling. But this is again a kind of default.
When King Xiang of Chu was crown prince, he was confronted by Qi. Huai Wang Xue, the crown prince resigned from the King of Qi and returned. Qi Wang Aizhi: "Give me five hundred miles to the east, and it is the son." The Son will not give me, and he will not return. The crown prince said, "The subject has Fu, please follow up and ask Fu." Fu Shenzi said, "The land of sacrifice is also for the body." Love does not send the Father to death, unrighteous. The subject knows, the gift of convenience. The prince entered, fatally Qi Wang Yue: "Five hundred miles of dedication." "The King of Qi returned to the Prince of Chu."
There is a clear discrepancy between the records in the Warring States Policy and the historical records. The death of King Huai is very different from the theory of the death of King Xiang. Is this a discrepancy between "hearsay" and real events?
Zhuang Xin said of the King of Chuxiang: "The kings Zuo Zhou Hou, Right Xiahou, Yan Lingjun and Shou Ling Jun, who are lascivious and extravagant, regardless of state politics, will be in danger." Xiang Wang said: "Sir, old rebellion?" Will you think that the Chu kingdom is auspicious? Zhuang Xin said: "The subject sincerely sees its inevitable." I don't dare to think that the national demon Xiang also. The king who died of the four sons will not fade, and the Chu kingdom will perish. The subject please leave Zhao and stay and watch. "Zhuang Xin went to Zhao, stayed in May, Qin Guoju Yan, Ying, Wu, Shangcai, Chen Land, Xiang Wang Liu Yu Yu Chengyang.
Twenty years after king Xiang, Qin Bai raised up the Chu XiLing, or plucked Yan, Yin, yiling, and burned the tomb of the first king. Wang Migrated northeast and stayed in Chen Cheng. Chu sui weakened and was lightened by Qin. So Bai Qi and the generals came to cut it down.
This period coincides with the re-battle of World War I and World War II.
The records of the Warring States Cehuai King and the Xiang King are all Yan Yin, where did these two generations of Chu kings live? I just think that symbolic separation is the mainstream view at the moment.
In the "Records of History" and "Warring States Policy", there is no indication that Ying is a certain Yin of Jiangling, and all the periods have been passed down to recognize Yingdu Jiangling?
In Qinghua Jian's "Chu Ju", Ying is a certain Yin.
In Chu curie, there were king of Chuzhuang and king of Chuhui who lived in Yan, and when the king of Chuzhuang was in Yan, the records did not show Yin, and when king Hui of Chu was in Yan, it was Yan, and it should be after the baigong caused the disaster, and the king of Chuhui took Yan as a yin.
According to other documents, king Chu Ling also had records of entering Yan. It may be that the residence time is short and is not included in Chuju.
Present-day Yicheng Zhengji as the capital of Chu can be determined during the reign of King Hui of Chu. The Chu people had the custom of moving the capital. The records of Chu Ju also show records of other Chu people migrating from Yan to other places.
The scattered remains of "Chu Ju" should be a major event that occurred to the Chu people, as for the termination of the record after the King of Chu Su migrated to The Chu Dynasty.
Where will Qu Yuan be?