laitimes

Xiamen "3.3" safety responsibility accident accountability is "dark lever"?

author:Weekend view

On March 7 last year, a collapse occurred at the Xinjia Hotel in Quanzhou, Fujian Province, killing 29 people and injuring 42 others. The investigation report determined that this was a major production safety liability accident, and 49 public officials, including the mayor of Quanzhou, were subsequently held accountable.

On March 3, 2017, the roof slope roof cement mortar tile layer on the south side of the C3rd floor of The C3rd Floor of Mingfa Commercial Plaza, Siming District, Xiamen, slid down as a whole, smashing the Yuyang Shed of the Red Transport Sichuan Cuisine Seafood Building on the ground, resulting in the safety liability accident of 2 diners and 5 injuries under the Yuyang Shed.

Xiamen "3.3" safety responsibility accident accountability is "dark lever"?

Accident scene

The investigation report issued by the "3.3" accident investigation team of Mingfa Commercial Plaza shows that the overall slippage of the roof slope roof cement mortar tile layer that occurred at about 22:00 on March 3, 2017 was a safety production liability accident caused by the illegal construction of the project department of Mingfa Commercial Plaza of Shenzhen Decoration Design Engineering Engineering Company of China Construction Third Bureau, the lack of supervision of the project supervision unit Xiamen Honesty Engineering Consulting Co., Ltd. and the project construction unit Mingfa Group Co., Ltd.

After the accident, the relevant departments shut down 14 shops in the commercial square and forcibly demolished the corresponding decorations.

According to Chen Lizhu, the owner of several shops in the commercial plaza, she was one of the biggest victims of the accident. After the accident, she spent a lot of money to decorate the beautifully decorated shop, and the decoration part was basically demolished.

Moreover, even if the rectification acceptance is still in words, the construction of rectification has long been completed in the year of the accident, but the relevant departments and property companies have been slow to provide her with the roof rectification acceptance report.

Xiamen "3.3" safety responsibility accident accountability is "dark lever"?

Shop renovations were forcibly demolished

To this end, on January 14, 2019, she complained to the Mailbox of the Governor of Fujian Province on the grounds that "the inaction of the Siming District Construction Bureau and the Safety Supervision Bureau has caused the commercial store to be unable to operate normally".

On March 5, 2019, the Siming District Work Safety Supervision and Administration Bureau made a letter and reply to it.

The reply said: The slope roof slippage accident on the C3rd floor of Mingfa Commercial Plaza, Siming District, was determined by the accident investigation team to be a production safety liability accident caused by the combination of various factors. The Siming District Work Safety Supervision and Administration Bureau imposed an administrative penalty of a fine of RMB320,000 on Xiamen Mingsheng Investment Management Co., Ltd. (i.e. Mingfa Property), which had relevant responsibilities, and ordered it to investigate and rectify the safety hazards of Mingfa Commercial Plaza, and Xiamen Mingsheng Investment Management Co., Ltd. paid the fine as scheduled on December 14, 2017.

On March 18, 2017, the roof renovation project of Mingfa Commercial Plaza began construction, the construction unit: Mingfa Group Co., Ltd., the construction unit: the third construction engineering co., LTD. of the Third Bureau of China Construction, the design unit: China Construction Northwest Design and Research Institute Co., Ltd., the renovation design unit: Qingdao Times Architectural Design Co., Ltd. Xiamen Branch, the supervision unit: Xiamen Honest Engineering Consulting Co., Ltd., the property unit: Xiamen Mingsheng Investment Management Co., Ltd. According to the progress of the roof renovation project, organized by the construction unit, design, supervision, construction and property units, the roofing renovation project of Mingfa Commercial Plaza (except for the seven units in Area C) was accepted on November 21, 2017, and the acceptance conclusion was "agreed acceptance"; on March 8, 2018, the roofing renovation project of Mingfa Commercial Plaza (seven units in Area C, that is, the original Shunlu storefront in Area 8-7# in Area C2) was accepted. Unit 150-151 on the first floor of Area B of Fa Commercial Plaza, which chen Lizhu specified, was included in the seven units of Area C, and the acceptance conclusion was that "the asphalt tile material of the roof of Unit Seven in Area C (the original Shunliu storefront in Area 8-7# of District C2) meets the requirements of the later transformation design and agrees to acceptance".

Xiamen "3.3" safety responsibility accident accountability is "dark lever"?
Xiamen "3.3" safety responsibility accident accountability is "dark lever"?

The petition replied that Chen Lizhu's storefront renovation had been accepted on March 8, 2018, but almost three years had passed, and the relevant departments and property companies still had not provided her with an acceptance report, resulting in her shop still unable to operate normally, and the loss of rent and established income was very heavy.

It has been four years since the accident occurred, so how do the relevant departments pursue responsibility and accountability?

The investigation report issued by the "3.3" accident investigation team states:

Recommendations for the treatment of the relevant responsible units

1. Slope roof roof tile layer construction subcontracting unit: Shenzhen Decoration Design Engineering Company of China Construction Third Bureau.

The project department of Mingfa Commercial Plaza of Shenzhen Decoration Design Engineering Company of China Construction Third Bureau changed the design without authorization and did not meet the requirements of the relevant change procedures without obtaining the permission of the design unit and violating the construction, and was mainly responsible for the occurrence of the accident. It is recommended that the Xiamen Municipal Construction Bureau handle it in accordance with the law.

2. Supervision unit: Xiamen Honesty Engineering Consulting Co., Ltd.

Xiamen Honesty Engineering Consulting Co., Ltd. did not supervise the unauthorized change of design and construction of the construction unit, and did not supervise the construction unit to rectify before the hidden acceptance of the project, thus laying a major hidden danger in the project and bearing the main responsibility for the occurrence of the accident. It is recommended that the Xiamen Municipal Construction Bureau handle it in accordance with the law.

3. Construction unit: Mingfa Group Co., Ltd.

The design unit adopted the atlas 00J201-1, and the construction unit should carry out the construction in accordance with the atlas standard, but as the construction unit of Mingfa Commercial Plaza, Mingfa Group Co., Ltd. violated the atlas standard in the form of an explicit construction unit, reduced the quality of the construction project, and was mainly responsible for the occurrence of the accident. It is recommended that the Xiamen Municipal Construction Bureau handle it in accordance with the law.

4. Construction general contractor: China Construction Third Bureau Third Construction Engineering Co., Ltd.

As the general contractor of Mingfa Commercial Plaza, the project department of Xiamen Mingfa Commercial Plaza of China Construction Third Bureau Third Company did not fulfill the responsibility entrusted by laws and regulations for the unauthorized change of design and construction of the subcontracting unit, and was entrusted with the management of the package, and had secondary responsibility for the occurrence of the accident. It is recommended that the Xiamen Municipal Construction Bureau handle it in accordance with the law.

Recommendations for handling relevant departments

1. It is recommended that the Xiamen Municipal Construction Bureau investigate the performance of the project by the subordinate Xiamen Construction Project Quality and Safety Supervision Station and related personnel, and notify the Siming District Government of the handling situation.

2. It is recommended that the Jialian Squadron of the Siming District Chengguan Law Enforcement Bureau and related personnel be instructed to make an inspection to the Siming District Urban Management Administrative Law Enforcement Bureau, and the Siming District Urban Management Administrative Law Enforcement Bureau to inspect the Siming District People's Government.

3. It is recommended that the Jialian Street Comprehensive Management Office of Siming District and relevant personnel be instructed to make an inspection to the Jialian Street Office of Siming District, and the Jialian Street Office of Siming District shall make an inspection to the People's Government of Siming District.

At the same time, it is recommended that the clues of the suspected criminal offenses in this case be transferred to the public security organs for investigation.

Xiamen "3.3" safety responsibility accident accountability is "dark lever"?
Xiamen "3.3" safety responsibility accident accountability is "dark lever"?

The above seven suggestions are very well written. But just "well-written", so far no processing result has been made public to the public.

If Xiamen in 2017 was considered to have a negative impact on the "BRICS Conference", it should always be dealt with after the meeting, right? As a result, the public still did not see it after the meeting, and the issue of accountability and accountability seems to have been "darkly leveraged" by the relevant departments in Xiamen.

Quanzhou Xinjia Hotel collapse accident, even the mayor of Quanzhou has been held accountable. But how should the safety liability accident in Xiamen, which caused 2 deaths, be held accountable?

Two lives, the consequences are very serious. Is it not the responsibility of the construction authorities that have previously carried out the completion and acceptance of the project? The departments responsible for supervision and supervision of safety production and urban management do not have to bear the responsibility for dereliction of duty? Has the safety license of the contractor of the project, China Construction Third Bureau, been temporarily withheld or punished in accordance with the law?

I hope that Xiamen can actively respond to public questions about all these issues. Learn from Quanzhou, make the issue of accountability clear and clear, and use practical actions to safeguard the credibility of the government! (Monitoring Watch)

Read on