When the original Red Dead Redemption was released in 2010, it was loved by a large number of gamers. Rockstar Studios has created a beautiful open world that blends western elements with Grand Theft Auto style. Ten years later, the old PS3 and Xbox 360 games have sparked a buzz of discussion, and to this day, the game still looks good.
One of the biggest advantages of Red Dead Redemption 2 is that it looks good, and even on the basic PS4 and Xbox One, this game is one of the best-looking games in the previous console career. But now many of the original players have come forward to remind everyone that the picture of the first generation of Red Dead Redemption is also very good.
Last year, "Red Dead Redemption 1" held its 10th anniversary, this heat was retained, and recently on the Reddit forum, there were many posts that began to show the first generation of "Red Dead Redemption".
Red Dead Redemption 2 surpasses its original in many ways. The sequel is a bigger world, more beautifully illustrated, more detailed, and most importantly, the protagonist, Arthur Morgan, is more popular than John Marston, and the story is more tragic.
But Red Dead Redemption 1, as the pioneer, laid a lot of groundwork for this IP, showing players a world of gunfights, duels and bounty hunters, allowing players to really start experiencing the cowboy career in the game, and many people were infected by John Marston's story and emotions.
Unfortunately, "Red Dead Redemption" failed to achieve the success of "Grand Theft Auto", and R Star himself has a lot of criticism of this development model of his big cousin, so I don't know what year and month we will have the opportunity to see "Red Dead Redemption 3" again.