laitimes

"The White Tower (III)" that you can't understand

author:Beijing Xinxiang Technology Co., Ltd

Back to the question at the beginning of the article, faced with such a situation, what kind of choice will you make? When a famous doctor who has saved countless people, in one operation, causes the patient to die quickly due to negligence, but he does not feel that he is wrong, and you, when you know the whole thing, will you tell the truth?

"The White Tower (III)" that you can't understand

Tell the truth, the patient's family will be compensated, the doctor will be dismissed from his job and cannot work, but you may also be implicated. Don't tell the truth, the patient's family is in trouble, the doctor can continue to work to save other patients, you will also benefit. Facing the patient's family, facing his own superior doctor, facing himself, a variety of situations are intertwined, and there are many possibilities. How to choose? Yanagihara as a small medical clerk, with a small salary, bearing an unstable career, when the hospital asked him, he was afraid, although we look very angry, but we can not harshly rebuke him, because he is also for life, which is a kind of sadness.

"The White Tower (III)" that you can't understand

As an associate professor with ideas, Satomi strives to study medical cases, treats each patient seriously, and when the hospital finds him, he does not give in, although we look very touched, but we also know that this is also difficult to be promoted, after all, there is no money, no equipment, no place to show medical skills, and his ability can not be played, which is also a sadness.

"The White Tower (III)" that you can't understand

Higashi Saeko is a young man who has just entered the society, she has witnessed many things in the office of her father Professor Higashi, and she has also looked at the choice in the case, she has been confused, and she has struggled to resist, and finally she said that she wants to go down alone, in fact, it also explains the complex situation of this society, and we have to choose alone, to go on.

"The White Tower (III)" that you can't understand

And how hard is it to stick to your heart? Look at the obstacles in this novel. The wealth of his father-in-law, the fame and fortune of the position held by Professor Ukai, the vision of his colleagues in the hospital, the exclusion of the lady's club, the pressure of academic papers, the position of the medical system, the wife's concern about the family... Picking out any one alone is a huge obstacle for ordinary people. And It is also in these temptations that He constantly loses himself, he was only to complete the goal of being a professor, but more and more pursuit of honor and status, when Professor Ukai asked him to elect the president is his hesitation, but also know that behind this is the process of Professor Ukai using himself to achieve the goal, but he knows that he has not yet established himself in the professorship, and still goes along the water to participate in the election activities, and uses the Medical Department to organize canvassing activities.

"The White Tower (III)" that you can't understand

With thousands of successful cases and the fastest surgical speed many times, who can say that such a high-level doctor once did not have the heart to work hard to treat the disease and save people? It was only under the setting of the japanese medical system professorship, in the competition of many interest groups, that he lost his part as a doctor and paid more attention to his part as a "public figure" and a "well-known doctor". And in the end, it was not the fault that really "killed" him, but the arrogant self, but the self lost in fame and fortune. So, Satomi is really a super ideal person. Therefore, it is really not easy to stick to the original heart, but it is still necessary to work hard.

"The White Tower (III)" that you can't understand

Finally, I want to say: everyone makes mistakes, everyone is not perfect. A single mistake does not determine anything, the focus is on the attitude towards the fault. Just because a person shouldn't have done something wrong means he's completely wrong.

Read on