Text/Public Nuisance
The news that Dai Lin was caught up in a dispute over tens of millions of private lending was overwhelming in these two days, and as a party, he also personally debunked the rumors, believing that the content of the court's ruling had been misinterpreted by the media. However, judging from the content of the ruling issued by the Shenyang Intermediate People's Court in Liaoning Province, it is difficult to reverse the rejection of Dai Lin's objection request and the maintenance of the Tiexi Court's preservation ruling.
The content of the ruling document issued by the Liaoning Intermediate Court is very clear, and the amount of pre-litigation preservation involved in this private lending dispute is as high as 10 million yuan, and there are three defendants including Dai Lin. The Tiexi court also issued a document to Shandong Taishan Football Club, to which Dai Lin belongs, which is also very clear: stop paying all remuneration for wages, bonuses, advertising agency fees, and dividends to Dai Lin, and stop paying the amount to 11268075 yuan. At the same time, the personal accounts of Dai Lin and another defendant were also frozen by the court.
Later, Dai Lin herself personally debunked the rumors, contacted the publishing media and posted on her own social platform, explained the relevant events, he said: The content of the ruling document is a ruling on preservation reconsideration, not a ruling on the implementation of his own tens of millions of assets. It is reprinted by the media in various ways, and after the change of intention, it becomes the need to rule tens of millions. Dai Lin also said that in the end, how much money is involved in the dispute will always be the day when the truth is revealed, rather than the media saying that the tens of millions of assets under his name are executed.
From the relevant ruling documents published on the judgment documents network, it can be seen that the civil loan dispute between plaintiff Zhang Lei and defendants Dai Lin, Chen Hong and Cao Xiaoyin was filed on March 9, 2021, and more than 10 million yuan is the amount of pre-litigation preservation property decided by the Tiexi court according to the application for pre-preservation of the original teller. Dai Lin did not know the news of Zhang Lei's case before, and believed that the amount of the seizure exceeded the standard, so she raised objections, but it was rejected by the Tiexi court. Later, Dai Lin applied to the Liaoning Intermediate People's Court for reconsideration, which led to the recently published document, that is, the final ruling on the preservation ruling of the private lending dispute case.
The ruling document of the Intermediate People's Court of Shenyang City, Liaoning Province, is clearly written: "Reject the reconsideration application of the reconsideration applicant Dai Lin, and uphold the (2021) Liao 0106 Zhiyi No. 127 Enforcement Ruling made by the Shenyang Tiexi District People's Court on April 9, 2021", and at the end of the ruling content, it notes that "this ruling is a final ruling".
That is to say, the Intermediate People's Court of Shenyang City, Liaoning Province, has concluded that the preservation ruling link of this case has been concluded, and Dai Lin's frozen property cannot be unfrozen for the time being. The fundamental cause of the storm in the preservation ruling - the case of the plaintiff Zhang Lei and the defendants Dai Lin, Chen Hong, cao Xiaoyin private loan dispute, has been filed, the amount of the dispute involved in Dai Lin, the plaintiff and the defendant are right and wrong, the outside world can only wait for the trial, the judgment and the truth as Dai Lin said, and the truth is revealed.
(Author: Public Nuisance)