Cafu won 2 World Cups, in terms of ability, the peak of the double card is the top player who eats one side, Carlos defense is not bad, the body is strong and fast, the explosive power is good and there is a free kick, so the ornamental attention is ahead of Cafu. In terms of ability, the two are not different, personally prefer Cafu, Cafu kicks the thief can use his brain and is steady, in the star-studded Brazil to be the captain can see this person's ability.
Carlos, in addition to the left side of the defensive tough, plugged in assists unusually fierce, but also a world power number one long-range attack.
In fact, Carfoe's position in football is much stronger than Carlos's, Carlos is far more offensive than defensive, his attack is actually a winger role, Carfoe is a very balanced player, and he assists will not go up like Carlos into the box, his 45°C pass is in place. And his physical strength is also better than Carlos's, and at the age of 35, he can still go up and sprint assists. Carlos was clearly given extra points by Real Madrid, with full-back defence being the first priority.
Carlos had two impressive defensive mistakes in the World Cup, one was the '98 World Cup against Denmark, he wanted to come to an upside-down break at the back point, and the result was to kick the air and be taken by Laudrup Jr. to score; the other was in 2006 against France, when Zidane played a free kick, Carlos was not yet tied, and was wrapped up by Henry at the back point to score, and Brazil was eliminated.
Carlos is fast, the wing plugs in the assist ability is strong, the free kick has speed and strength, the defense is first-class, it belongs to the players who open and close, Cafu is stable in defense, belongs to the decent players, do not look at the data do not know that Cafu goals and assists are also so powerful, Cafu in brazil is as if he has always been the captain, from the defense said That Cafu is more stable.
Modern full-backs attack lightly, not without defense, modern play is more inclined to full-back assists plugged in, back pull side to make up for the position behind the body, attack and defend occasionally too late to retreat is understandable, but not all attacks are rapid counterattacks, position defense can better reflect the level of a defender, full-backs need to have a good position at the edge of the box, follow the pace of the winger, find the right time to complete the steal, so the defensive requirements of the full-backs are not low, but do not need to deal with too many high-altitude balls and physical confrontations.
Both Carver and Carlos are full-backs with strong offensive ability, but I think if a team must need Carlos's strong offensive ability to score, it can only mean that your midfield organization and the finishing ability of the striker are too different, otherwise Carfoe's offensive ability is absolutely enough, and in the case of both attacking ability, better defense is the biggest guarantee for stable wins.
Normal defensive Carlos is not weak, but speaking of full-back functionality alone, the same period stronger than Carlos is Maldini Zambrotta Cavo. Carlos is one of the few full-backs to cut inside, full of spectators, full of live football stats, so many people who don't watch the game will think Carlos is very strong.
Carlos defense is not weak, but compared with some familiar players, is it better than Araba, Robertson, but Maldini, or Kafu in addition to saying a kick, are better than Carlos, and like Maldini Carfo in the team does not need to take free kicks, because let's say the team, Pirlo, Rui Costa, Seedorf, Ronaldo Jr.
Many fans think that of course Cafu is stronger! Both of them are football ceilings, but as a full-back, Kafo's defensive ability is completely exploded Carlos, super physical, can go up and down, unlike Carlos, it is difficult to come back. In small matches, Carlos gave at least three classic colander performances in the 98 World Cup. And Cafu, 35 years old can still prevent the 20-year-old C Luo from crying without tears.
I think the two are equally capable, and as a Brazilian fan, it is indeed very happy to see both of them at the peak of the 2002 World Cup! If you really want to compare, Cafu is more balanced in attack and defense, Carlos attacks better than defense; Carlos is more rare as a left-back, Cafu has been very stable, but personally feel that McCone in the 09-10 season is stronger than the peak Cavo.
If both offensive and defensive ends and tactical effects on the team are calculated in ten points, Carlos will have 9 points on offense, 5 points on defense, and 7 points for tactical effect. Cafue had 7 points offensively, nine points defensively, and nine points for tactical role.
Carlos attacked fiercely in the front, but the defense was full of loopholes, and Carlos was not a top defender. Kafu's ability is super strong, attack and defense do not need others to supplement the defense, and the ability to cooperate is strong, one-on-one ability is strong.
So Cafu is stronger than Carlos, Carlos is capable of Marcelo, Maldini have their own advantages and disadvantages. But trying to dominate the first left-back is probably almost interesting.