It seems that overnight, the entertainment industry collapsed countless rooms, and fans cried and shouted, afraid that the next collapse would be their own home.
In addition to the incident of the artist's private morality, not to mention, some people's behavior has violated the law and the bottom line of the country:
Before there was a Wu signature that violated the criminal law, needless to say, it will be severely punished by the law;
After Xiao S, on his overseas social platform account, openly supported Taiwan independence athletes, was questioned by countless netizens, and then responded, but everyone did not buy it, only because of its few responses, more like an "exclusive version" for mainland netizens.

The small S storm will be overwhelmed, and Zhang Zhehan, who has just been on fire for a few days, has been exposed to many times worse:
First, some netizens found out that he had attended a friend's wedding at Nogi Shrine;
Nogi Shrine is used to pay homage to Nogi Nogi and his wife, and Nogi Nogi was the commander of the Lushun War during the Sino-Japanese War, the initiator of the Lushun Massacre, and one step of the wedding ceremony is to visit Nogi Nogi;
Moreover, the vast majority of those who attended the wedding were Japanese right-wingers, and the main marriage, Mrs. Devi, was a well-known anti-China element, and had repeatedly made a series of remarks in public, such as "The Nanjing Massacre was used by China to smear Japan" and "Tibet was invaded by China";
Zhang Zhehan did not take a group photo with him, but also posted the photo on the social platform;
Saying that they don't know where nogi shrine is, netizens may still reluctantly accept this explanation;
But Zhang Zhehan's studio head iron is very iron, not only does not apologize, but also put a lawyer letter, that means that netizens are false accusations, to clean up one by one;
On the other hand, the bridegroom of the wedding stood up and apologized, saying that he did not know Mrs. Devi and did not know the political background of the guests at the wedding;
As a result, the background of the groom's official website for selling goods was the infamous Yasukuni Shrine, and Zhang Zhehan himself was also picked up to have posted photos of the Sun Flag modified car on social platforms and happily toured the Yasukuni Shrine.
As a Chinese star who also often sets up a book reader, does it make sense not to know where the Yasukuni Shrine is?
Finally, Zhang Zhehan himself issued an apology statement, but this statement was not sincere, pushing all the problems to "ignorance", causing everyone's anger and dissatisfaction.
Now, major brands have terminated their contracts, their online social accounts have also been banned, banned, and their works have all been taken off the shelves.
In addition to the iron powder that is still busy washing white everywhere, and the "please treat the Zhang Zhehan incident with caution" and call on everyone to "not riot on the Internet", Zhang Zhehan has become a "public figure" who has changed the color of passers-by.
Since the Olympic Games, the various "hades operations" of the Japanese Olympic Organizing Committee have attracted the complaints and dissatisfaction of many netizens.
With the arrival of 8.15, a series of news and news related to Japan have received widespread attention from netizens.
Japanese actress Rimi Ishihara, because of her sweet appearance, was directly called "wife" by countless men and women, and has also become the object of discussion in these days, and countless people have called "wake up at night, the wife is gone", the cause is a report.
In an interview, she served as the torchbearer of the Tokyo Olympics in the Nagasaki area, and expressed her sentiment: "To achieve peace, we must have the courage to understand the cruel truth."
In fact, if you look at the content of this report alone, Rimi Ishihara's statement does not seem to be particularly wrong. She expressed the following two attitudes:
One is that she believes that war is cruel and that peace can only be achieved if people are aware of this;
Second, after meeting the victims of the atomic bombing, she felt that the consequences of the war were a hundred times more painful than those described on television and in books;
So in combination with the above two points, war is caused by mutual incomprehension, and she hopes that nuclear weapons can be abolished and everyone can understand each other.
However, these statements, which at first glance are not inappropriate, can cause protests from domestic netizens because they are related to some political remarks and thinking in Japan.
For a long time, Japan has been active in dealing with World War II with two attitudes, one is "anti-war" and the other is "anti-war defeat". In terms of results, both attitudes ultimately preached the idea of "anti-war", but their way of thinking was very different.
"Anti-war" proceeds from the cause and nature of the war, believing that the war itself is cruel and inhumane, and that the culprit who initiated the war is evil; while "anti-war defeat" proceeds from the result of the war, because the initiation of the war does not lead itself to a good result, so it opposes the war.
At the root, "anti-defeat" is not really anti-war, and these people are anti-war because they did not benefit from the war.
("Attack on Titan" has been spat on countless times because of its rotten tail and "anti-defeat" right-wing tendencies)
How to judge whether it is anti-war or anti-defeat is actually very simple.
August 15, 1945, a day that Chinese people will never forget. Emperor Hirohito of Japan published the Edict of the End of the War, in which he reads:
The foreign aggression was described by him as "working for the liberation of East Asia"; the scene of the blood of other countries flowing into rivers was brushed over by the "Gufei Benzhi";
As for Japan's own losses, the Great Book specially reads, "Remembering the death of the imperial subjects in battle, martyrdom in the line of duty, and death in the hands of the non-mortals and their bereaved families, the five internal organs are torn apart; as for the war wounds, the scourge of war, and the livelihood of those who have lost their homes, they are also deeply remembered."
This is the typical "anti-war defeat": although I was the aggressor, I suffered very heavy losses, so I decided to stop the war.
This is not some "Final Commandment", but a naked word game.
Now, when the mainstream right-wing in Japan publicizes its anti-war ideology, it also adopts this kind of statement, such as the "cruel bomb, frequent killing of innocents" mentioned in the "Edict of the Final War", which has been widely used for propaganda.
The two atomic bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki became their tools for selling misery. One of its core arguments is that "Japan is also a victim of nuclear weapons."
Therefore, the real "anti-war" should be to reflect on what kind of crimes they have committed; and these "anti-war defeats" will only repeatedly declare that they are too miserable, but never mention why they have fallen into such a fate.
Therefore, Rimi Ishihara's support for the destruction of nuclear weapons does not have too many black spots in itself. But she uses the atomic bomb victims in Nagasaki as an entry point to tell this point, that is, she has only one "victim" in her eyes. And how can our millions of suffering compatriots and descendants, who have suffered from its aggression, accept this view?
Of course, in fact, from Rimi Ishihara herself, she may not really be a member of the Japanese right-wing, and even before that she has been attacked by the right-wing on the Internet.
But after she made this remark, she was sought after by many Japanese right-wingers.
Because these remarks are in line with their main purpose and intention of "opposing defeat in the war."
In the message below this news, even many people have issued such remarks: "To this day, the war of aggression against China will still be held accountable, but the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima in Japan is much more brutal and terrifying than the war of aggression against China." ”
This kind of statement, which does not distinguish between cause and effect, distorts the facts, and reverses black and white, is exactly what we find difficult to accept and that we strongly condemn.
It is no wonder that domestic netizens have launched a discussion on "no unjust soul under the atomic bomb".
In fact, Japanese netizens will make such remarks, which is directly related to the education they have received.
As we all know, a few years ago, in Japanese textbooks, the Diaoyu Dao and its affiliated islands were written as Japan's "inherent territory", and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs has negotiated with them many times.
In fact, however, there is more shameless content in Japanese textbooks.
His account of the history of World War II is written "for peace and prosperity" and glorifies itself as a white lotus that emerges from the mud and does not stain it; in its description of China, China becomes the "ambitious" country.
The description of China in Japanese textbooks is roughly divided into three stages, the ancient period from the origin of Chinese civilization to the eve of the outbreak of the Opium War, the modern period from the outbreak of the Opium War to 1949, the modern period from the founding of the People's Republic of China to the present, the Chinese history involved are closely related to the history of Japan. From ancient times to modern times, textbooks show different "Chinese images" .
Most of the descriptions of ancient China are "advanced civilization" and "vast territory".
However, since the image of China in modern times, Japan has distorted history in textbooks, tried its best to smear it, and made excuses for aggression in a dignified manner.
After all, textbooks are the control tools of the legitimate state's will, which have a great influence on students' values and can lay the ideological foundation for their aggression and expansion.
At the beginning of the Meiji period, most of the geography textbooks in Japanese elementary schools used the 1869 Fukuzawa Yukichi's "The End of the World", which began with "Asia Minor", which called China the largest country in Asia, with a large population and a vast land.
In the process of civilizationalization, the Daqing Dynasty, which gradually lagged behind, was politically corrupt and incompetent at home, and was bullied and humiliated by western powers everywhere, in its book, was regarded as the reason for China's fiasco in the Opium War, which was considered to be because of the "vain start of the military".
At the same time, it believes that China is arrogant and arrogant, the people's wisdom has not been opened, and those who are backward will be suppressed by the advanced.
This may not be unjust for the late Qing Dynasty. However, Japanese textbooks began to fabricate history, packaging the two great thinkers of Confucius and Mencius as Japanese "loyal subjects" and "filial piety" to promote the blind obedience concept of loyalty to the monarch.
In modern Japanese textbooks, descriptions of Chinese customs and customs are mainly concentrated in geography textbooks and Chinese textbooks.
For example, in the 1935 Geography Book of Ordinary Elementary Schools, it was described as follows:
"Manchuria borders China, has extremely close relations in national defense and industry, and is the lifeline of our country. In the battles of The Qing Dynasty and between Japan and Russia, as well as in the Manchurian Incident in the eighth year of showa, our country made great sacrifices for it.
Therefore, as soon as Manchuria became independent from China, china immediately recognized it. Subsequently, china withdrew from the League of Nations and is making great efforts for peace in East Asia and the development of Manchuria. ”
Beautiful words such as peace and development were associated with colonization and the truth of their aggression was covered up.
The 1938 Geography Book of Ordinary Elementary Schools reads:
"In Shandong Province and other regions, there are many Japanese people engaged in commerce, industry, shipping and other industries, and the transportation and trade between the two countries are also increasingly developed.
However, in recent years, China's rulers have held the wrong idea, advocated the idea of anti-Japanese and anti-Japanese resistance, and held a hostile attitude toward our country, which eventually led to the events of July 1912.
In order to promote Chinese introspection and under the mission of building eternal peace in East Asia, china has made every effort to gradually accomplish this goal. ”
Such textbooks have seriously deviated from the fundamental principles of objective and scientific description of human geography and have become brainwashing tools for controlling thought.
In addition to beautifying and revising objective facts, Japanese textbooks often write some literary and story essays to confuse the public.
For example, in the lesson "Spring in China" in the 1942 edition of "Elementary science Chinese", the Chinese people's human outlook is described in bright prose:
"The willow trees by the river have turned completely green. At the bottom of the built earthen dam, I don't know when, a lot of grass grew. Birds sang cheerfully nearby. ”
Then, while two Japanese soldiers were enjoying the scenery by the river, a group of Chinese children ran over happily and took candy from the Japanese soldiers.
"Got the candy, and the kids honestly sat or lay by the river. They ate candy and sang songs. Although the children did not sing well, they sang the "Patriotic March" taught to them by the soldiers. ”
At the end of the text, it is written, "The cold winter has fled to nowhere, and the quiet, tomorrow Spring of China has arrived." ”
If it is a peaceful era, this scene of peaceful coexistence without estrangement and discrimination is indeed heart-warming.
However, this poetic scenery takes place on the battlefield of the war of aggression, and the protagonist of the story is the two sides of the invasion and the invaded, which seems to be a simple scene, but its purpose is not dare to think about.
In the TV series "Cliff", there is such a plot:
On the moving train, a pregnant woman finally couldn't stand it and threw up because of motion sickness, coupled with pregnancy reactions;
Just at this time, the puppet Manchu policeman and a Japanese soldier came to check the documents and found that the pregnant woman's vomit contained rice;
So, in full view of everyone, the pregnant woman was taken away.
On March 1, 1932, the pseudo-"Manchukuo" was established. It was a puppet government controlled by Japan, both in the police and in the security forces, serving the Japanese.
In 1938, at the direction of the Japanese, puppet Manchukuo promulgated the Rice Valley Administration Law. In the Rice And Grain Management Law, rice, wheat and soybeans are divided into Class A grains, and sorghum, corn and millet are classified as Class B.
Class A grain is exclusively for the Japanese, and if Chinese eat it, it is a crime. If someone possesses and eats Class A food, it is a felony and an "economic crime", which is naked aggression and exploitation.
However, when pseudo-Manchu is mentioned in Japanese history textbooks, the content described by Japan is basically that "Manchuria has been a barren land since ancient times, and Japan established an independent state in order to develop and build Manchuria."
Beautifying the invasion of northeast China as "liberating" the people of northeast China from the hands of warlords and great powers, advocating that aggression is justified and meritorious, distorting this period of history, and also photographing many false "truths."
Food is yet to be taken, not to mention the infamous 731.
Harmony, is it possible?
After the end of World War II, the militarists were not completely liquidated and sneaked up on their heads. After a few years of the Japanese government's suspension, right-wing ideas resurged and once again dominated the mainstream among dignitaries, and then they repeated the same tactics and continued to "brainwash" students through textbooks.
In June 1954, the Japanese government promulgated the Law on the Correction of the Law on Special Cases for Civil Servants in Education and the Law on Provisional Measures for Ensuring Political Neutrality in Education in Compulsory Education Schools, which seemed to allow teachers and staff to maintain a neutral and objective position to teach students, but in fact prohibited teachers from participating in left-wing organizations and political parties.
In 1956, the Japanese government promulgated a series of bills on textbooks, which transferred the approval and selection of textbooks to the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Sports, Science and Technology, which was already under the control of right-wing forces.
They demanded revision and deletion of the contents of Japan's foreign aggression designed in textbooks, such as the relevant content of Unit 731, which was considered "too early to be written into textbooks."
At the same time, it is also mandatory to add the content of "loyalty to the emperor" in textbooks, and if they are not complied with, they will be permanently "unqualified" and banned from entering the campus, and scholars who compile textbooks at the same time will also be excluded and coerced.
Saburo Ieaga is a famous Japanese historian. His "New History of Japan" was widely adopted by Japanese high schools because of its objectivity and fairness.
In 1962, the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Sports, Sports, Science and Technology determined that the textbook was not qualified and asked it to revise the description of the crimes committed by Japan in World War II.
From 1965 to 1997, Ieaga saburo filed three lawsuits in the court, the first and second times under the manipulation of the Japanese government, and ended in complete failure.
In August 1997, Japan's Supreme Court finally submitted a final judgment on the case, finding that the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology had violated the law in four places, including the "Nanjing Massacre" and "Unit 731", and Ieaga Saburo had won a partial victory.
Although he was not entirely satisfied with the verdict, he was eighty years old and did not have the strength to file a lawsuit again. Over the past few decades, he has been repeatedly threatened by Japanese right-wing forces and attacked by reactionary historians, and has had to resign as a professor at Tokyo University of Education.
In 1957, Class A war criminal Nobusuke Kishi became Prime Minister of Japan, setting off a right-wing upsurge in Japan. In Southeast Asian countries, the "China threat theory" was vigorously promoted and publicly stated that they did not recognize the People's Republic of China.
Although his move was opposed by the left both inside and outside Japan, Japan gradually began to "turn right" because of the gradual prosperity of the Japanese economy and the strong support of the United States.
By the 1970s, the Cold War was coming to an end, and Japan's right-wing forces were even more unscrupulous. In 1978, 14 Class-A war criminals, including Hideki Tojo, as well as thousands of war criminals convicted by the Far Eastern Military Tribunal, were enshrined in the Yasukuni Shrine and began a "call" for militarism.
Beginning in 1982, the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology began to falsify the history of the war of aggression against China:
The outbreak of the Sino-Japanese War, which was originally due to the Japanese Navy's surprise attack on Chinese warships, was described in textbooks as "a naval battle between Japanese and Qing warships";
The 918 Incident was simply referred to as "the Japanese army blew up the South Manchuria Railway", the all-out invasion of China was called "in and out of North China", and the Nanjing Massacre was called the result of "the stubborn resistance of the Chinese army".
In 1985, yasuhiro Nakasone, then Prime Minister of Japan, was strongly protested by East Asian countries for paying homage to the Yasukuni Shrine as prime minister for the first time in his official capacity as prime minister.
On the other hand, the Ministry of Education's newly approved "New History of Japan" has intensified, saying that in World War II, Japan was "forced to fight" and that Japan fought a just battle to "liberate Asia and build a greater East Asia co-prosperity sphere."
In 1988, Makoto Okano, the governor of japan's Land Agency, publicly stated that the Chinese bones and Japanese saber motifs in front of the Nanjing Massacre Victims Monument were not conducive to "Sino-Japanese friendship." After being condemned, he also said that Japan was "launching a war to protect national security."
Since 1998, the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports,
By 2005, the right-wing group New Japan History Textbook Compilation Association had compiled a New History Textbook, which is exactly what we complain about today.
This textbook uses three tricks of confusion, washing, and gold paste, and falsifies most of the historical facts:
Describing the Sino-Japanese Sino-Japanese War, the book reads: "The Qing did not want to lose the last tributary state of Korea, and began to make Japan an enemy. Japan waged two wars, the Sino-Japanese and Russo-Japanese wars, as a result of this international relationship in East Asia. ”
Describing the September 18 Incident, the book reads: "Since the government's diplomatic policy could not solve the harm suffered by the Japanese in Manchuria, the people became increasingly dissatisfied, and there were many people who supported the actions of the Kwantung Army." ”
In describing the July 7 Incident, the book reads: "At the Lugou Bridge on the outskirts of Beijing, there was an incident in which someone shot at the Japanese troops, and the next day the Chinese side continued to shoot and entered a state of combat. The incident itself was nothing more than a small friction, and although it was hoped that it would be resolved on the spot, the conflict with the Japanese side continued to occur, and it became difficult to resolve it. ”
Referring to the Nanjing Massacre, it states that "the Tokyo Trials found that Japanese troops killed many Chinese people when they occupied Nanjing in the Sino-Japanese War of 1937." However, regarding the actual situation of the incident, there are many doubts and opinions found in the data, and it is still being debated. ”
In addition to this, there are several elements in the book:
Calling Japan the "liberator" of Asia, "bringing the ideal of independence to the people of Southeast Asia and India", "Indonesia and Burma established armies under the guidance of the Japanese army";
"Later, after Japan's defeat and retreat, these colonies successively achieved independence on their own strength in the past few decades, some Japanese soldiers stayed behind to participate in the War of Independence, and Japan was stationed in the south for 'self-preservation and self-defense', but the result was the effect of the asian countries' independence time advance."
An aggressor is rendered as a "savior" by life.
For victory, the book glorifies it as "liberation", and for defeat, it exaggerates the loyalty of soldiers.
For example, in the unit of "Life in Wartime", it is written: "All goods are insufficient, even the bells and other metals in the temple have been contributed for the war, and the living materials are extremely poor, but in such difficulties, many people work hard and persevere, which is an action to hope for victory in the war." ”
At the same time, he did not forget to describe himself as a "victim of the war", emphasized the air raids suffered by Japan, and overturned the case for the war criminals:
"On March 10, 1945, the Great Air Raid on Tokyo killed about 100,000 citizens overnight;"
"The Soviet Union violated the Japan-Soviet neutrality treaty, invaded Manchuria, committed violence, plundered and killed Japanese civilians, and brought 600,000 Japanese, including Japanese prisoners, to Siberia and subjected them to brutal labor, killing about one in ten."
"In the Tokyo trial, all the leaders of the war who were declared war criminals were convicted, and Prime Minister Hideki Tojo and seven others were sentenced to hanging, and the defendants in the verdict were considered to be crimes of peace, which is a war crime that is not a war crime of self-defense, and there is no precedent for punishing national leaders for such crimes."
With such an education, it is no wonder that most of today's Japanese people are influenced by these ideas and are convinced of them.
Since the 1980s, japan has protested against japan's falsification of history, with asian countries having reacted most violently to it.
However, to this day, the Japanese right-wing is still tampering with history, reversing black and white, and in addition to textbooks, it has also "whitewashed" itself in various ways.
Just this past August 15, Japan publicly held a "memorial service for the war victims" of World War II.
The current Japanese prime minister also issued a document calling the aggressors "holy spirits" who sacrificed "for peace and prosperity."
Such a disgusting act is chilling.
Of course, it cannot be denied that although Japan has "turned to the right" as a whole, there are also some meager left-wing forces that have been actively opposing the war.
A few days ago, a blogger on Weibo posted that many people had begun to go to Douban to give Miyazaki's works a low score, and also called it a reactionary director, whitewashing the defeat.
The movie "The Wind Rises" has always been a controversial work. The male protagonist finally realized his dream and became an aircraft designer through his efforts, but he found that the aircraft he built became a tool for killing people on the battlefield.
However, the male protagonist prototype, Jiro Horikoshi, was the designer of the Japanese capital carrier-based fighter and the Zero fighter during World War II, and was the main force that protected the bombers when bombing Chongqing, killing many Chinese. But these are not mentioned in the film, so some people have given the film a low-star rating.
In addition, many movies have also suffered.
For example, the movie "Porco Rosso" was also given 1 star, but "Porco Rosso" is a very obvious anti-war film, and the protagonist also said in the movie that he would rather be a pig than join the fascists.
Moreover, Miyazaki himself was a member of the Japanese Communist Party and repeatedly urged the Japanese government to admit his crime of invading China.
Therefore, it is actually unreasonable to strongly condemn and block him.
However, when the crow wanted to go to the Douban comment area to see these bad reviews, he found that there were only a dozen bad reviews, and the time period was concentrated between 2 and 5 pm on August 16.
Its size and number are not consistent with what Weibo bloggers say.
The blogger then countered that he was speaking for a director he liked, and even if there were only a few bad reviews, it was real.
However, under that Microblog, many people have already begun to insult the Chinese people.
In fact, we cannot put our heads on all Japanese and force them to confess their crimes, because they are Japanese and have their natural position.
Moreover, most of them are still immersed in the concept of history forged by Japan's right-wing government, and it is not a matter of quarreling that they can reverse their thinking.
However, this is not an excuse for some people to forgive the Japanese for glorifying aggression and defend them, nor should it be a tool to attack our own people.
We are not qualified to forgive the crimes committed by the Japanese army invading China for our ancestors, nor will we forgive those self-righteous crooked asses.
Resources:
Tan Jianchuan: The image of China in modern Japanese textbooks
Shenzhen Evening News: The six lies of Japanese textbooks falsify history