<h1 class="pgc-h-center-line" > (this article is about 3000 words, the reading time is about 6 minutes, there is a voting session in the article, please participate!) ）</h1>
Pre-reading small survey: Who do you think is the "first brother" of China's snooker? Radio
0 people 0% Ding Junhui
0 people 0% Fu Jiajun vote
<h1 class="pgc-h-center-line" > preface:</h1>
In the Field of China Snooker, Ding Junhui and Fu Jiajun represent the top players in mainland China and Hong Kong respectively. If it is Fu Jiajun who led the new trend of Chinese snooker, then Ding Junhui is undoubtedly the "tide maker" of China's snooker. This article will focus on the analysis of how Ding Junhui surpassed the "forerunner" Fu Jiajun and gradually grew into the "first brother" of China's snooker.
<h1 class= "pgc-h-center-line" >, "prodigy" Ding Junhui and "Magic Boy" Fu Jiajun</h1>
Chinese snooker leader: Ding Junhui
▲ Ding Junhui
Ding Junhui, the absolute leader of China's snooker, one of the world's snooker "80 Five Tigers", is the first player in the post-80s to break through 10 ranking champions. Ding Junhui currently has 14 ranking championships and a professional prize of £3.83 million, making him recognised as Asia's best player. Ding Junhui's control of the white ball is extremely precise, juvenile and old, and there are few psychological fluctuations, known as the "Chinese prodigy". Ding Junhui has won the British Championship three times and was crowned the Masters in 2011, but he has been doing nothing in the world championship, the highest honor of snooker, and the impact player "three major" Grand Slams has not been successful, but it does not prevent him from becoming the top 10 super players in the snooker industry.
"Wonder Boy" in Hong Kong, China: Fu Jiajun
▲Fu Jiajun
Fu Jiajun, a professional snooker athlete in Hong Kong, China, showed outstanding snooker talent at a young age, winning 5 championships in the youth group at the age of 19, and the title of "Magic Boy" has never gone away since then, and has been widely circulated. Although Fu Jiajun only has 3 ranking championships in hand, his promotion and promotion of snooker in Hong Kong is revolutionary, and it is precisely because of his appearance that countless Chinese teenagers have begun to contact and like snooker's elegant "gentleman's sport". Fu Jiajun's batting rhythm is a textbook, "steady progress, and then not chaotic" is a beautiful interpretation of his style of play, and he was named "Global Jieqing" in 2017.
Ding Junhui and Fu Jiajun's career basic situation
<h1 class= "pgc-h-center-line" >, Ding Junhui and Fu Jiajun career data comparison</h1>
This chapter will compare the 4 basic data between Ding Junhui and Fu Jiajun, and then make a preliminary judgment: Which is better than Ding Junhui and Fu Jiajun?
1. Comparison of world rankings and single-season rankings
The world ranking and single-season ranking of players can best reflect the competitive state of a player and are also an important indicator of the strength of players.
Ding Junhui and Fu Jiajun's world ranking comparison
From the perspective of world rankings, Ding Junhui has climbed to 10th in the world after winning the British Championship, and has gained 430,000 pounds in a two-year period. Fu Jiajun's world ranking is stable in the world's 50th, and the prize money is also 110,000 pounds. There is a gap of 40 places in the world ranking between the two, and the prize money is 320,000 pounds.
Ding Junhui and Fu Jiajun's single-season ranking comparison
From the perspective of single-season rankings, "Director Ding" came to the 5th position of the season, earning 260,000 pounds in a single season; while Fu Jiajun dropped 4 places from the same period last season, ranking 46th in a single season, with a prize money of only 42,000 pounds, less than a fraction of Xiaoding's bonus. The gap between the two is as high as 41 places, and the prize gap is £218,000.
Summary: Fu Jiajun has been plagued by eye diseases in recent years, and his state has fluctuated greatly, while Ding Junhui has recovered significantly in his state this season, which is even more the haze of the 806-day championship drought after winning three major championships after 10 years. This also illustrates the difference in current status between the two: Ding Junhui is still a top snooker player (generally in the top 16 of the world ranking and the top 8 in a single season), while Fu Jiajun is a mid-level player (ranking 32 to 64 in a single season), and the gap is obvious.
2. Comparison of the number of games and the number of innings
Ding Junhui and Fu Jiajun's number of matches and innings compared
Fu Jiajun landed on the professional field 5 years earlier than Ding Junhui,
Summary: Although Ding Junhui is completely behind Fu Jiajun in terms of the number of games and the number of games, his winning rate and winning rate are much higher than Fu Jiajun, which shows that Ding Junhui has a more superb game-ending ability than Fu Jiajun.
3. Comparison of each other's combat records
Ding Junhui and Fu Jiajun's record of fighting each other
In the record 17 meetings between the two sides, Ding Junhui won 10 of them, while Fu Jiajun won 7, and Ding Junhui led Fu Jiajun by nearly 17 percentage points with a winning percentage of 58.82%.
Summary: In the confrontation between snooker players, if two people of similar level are generally within plus or minus 5%, but the winning rate of Ding Fu and Fu is more than 15%, which also proves that Ding Junhui often occupies an overwhelming advantage when playing with Fu Jiajun.
4. Comparison of offensive and defensive capabilities
Ding Junhui and Fu Jiajun's offensive and defensive capabilities are compared
In terms of offense, Ding Junhui completed a single shot of 529 strokes to break the hundred, and the percentage of breaks reached 8.26%, while Fu Jiajun's single shot broke the hundred was 492, which was difficult to score, but Fu Jiajun's break percentage rate was 1 percentage point behind Ding Junhui.
In terms of the number of deciders, Ding Junhui played 17 fewer sets of deciders than Fu Jiajun, but he significantly led Fu Jiajun's 49.49% tiebreaker win rate with a tiebreaker win rate of 61.33%, showing a good ability to end the game.
In terms of the number of clean sheets, Ding Junhui lagged behind Fu Jiajun's 124 times with 110 times, but still suppressed Fu Jiajun's 69.35% clean sheet win rate with a 73.64% clean sheet win rate.
Summary: Whether it is offensive ability or defensive level, Ding Junhui must be ahead of Fu Jiajun, and Ding Junhui is also obviously excellent in the end ability on the field.
<h1 class= "pgc-h-center-line" > three, Ding Junhui and Fu Jiajun advantages and disadvantages analysis</h1>
This chapter will analyze the performance of Ding Junhui and Fu Jiajun in the format competition from the two aspects of the winning rate and round statistics, so as to predict the advantages and disadvantages of the two in the snooker competition.
1. Comparison of winning percentages
Ding Junhui and Fu Jiajun's winning percentage comparison
According to the chart, it is not difficult to see that the "blue line" representing Ding Junhui is always above the "red line" representing Fu Jiajun, which means that whether it is in the 11-game 6-win and short-term game, or in the 25-game 13-win and below mid-game game, or even in the 31st innings and 16-win and above super long-game matches, whether it is the number of games and the winning rate, Ding Junhui has a better performance than Fu Jiajun. This also fully proves that Ding Junhui is more adapted to various snooker formats than Fu Jiajun, and it is reasonable to achieve better results in various format competitions, and even win the championship of the ranking competitions of each format.
2. Round statistics comparison
Round statistics comparison between Ding Junhui and Fu Jiajun
In terms of 9 rounds of comparison, Fu Jiajun only had the advantage in 2 rounds (semi-finals and group stage), the other 7 rounds were completely behind, and in the final round, Ding Junhui was directly KO out of the round with 2:0.
Summary: Comparatively speaking, whether it is snooker competitions or in all rounds of the fight, Ding Junhui plays better than Fu Jiajun, and in the head-to-head duel, he wins Fu Jiajun with a very high winning rate.
<h1 class="pgc-h-center-line" >4. Conclusion</h1>
Based on the above analysis, we can draw the following conclusions:
Player competitive status level: Ding Junhui has a better state than Fu Jiajun in the world rankings for a 2-year cycle or in the single-season rankings. Therefore, it is entirely reasonable that Ding Junhui has recently won more ranking championships than Fu Jiajun.
In terms of ability to end the game: Although Fu Jiajun played more games than Ding Junhui and played more rounds of competition, he still lagged behind Ding Junhui in terms of winning percentage, which fully proved that Ding Junhui's ability to end the game was far more than Fu Jiajun.
Offensive and defensive ability level: In the process of fighting each other, as well as the record of fighting with their respective opponents, Ding Junhui has shown a sharper offensive ability and a tighter defensive level than Fu Jiajun, and in the comprehensive judgment of the integration of attack and defense, Ding Junhui is completely crushing Fu Jiajun's existence.
At the level of adapting to the format: whether in the snooker short, medium and long formats, or in the round statistics of each format, Ding Junhui is always the one who plays better than Fu Jiajun.
<h1 class="pgc-h-center-line" > written at the end</h1>
The forerunner and inheritor of China's snooker
Ding Junhui and Fu Jiajun are two of China's best snooker players: Fu Jiajun is the forerunner, pouring a new soil on the desert of China's snooker; and Ding Junhui is the inheritor and transcendent, allowing more and more Chinese teenagers to devote themselves to the sport of snooker. Whether it is a forerunner or a successor, they are equally worthy of our respect and praise, and we sincerely look forward to the emergence of more and more snooker inheritors and transcendents in China.
(This article is the original debut of the headlines, without the consent and authorization of the author, it may not be reprinted, and the offender will be investigated!) ）