Follow me and take you to unlock the wealth code and turn on the good luck buff! Like and follow, let your fortune soar all the way, and good luck can't stop it!
After Putin's men arrived in Iran, Khamenei, who had been scolded for a long time, made up his mind and immediately attacked Israel
Title: Putin's 'conspiracy' triggers Iran's retaliatory actions against Israel
:
On October 1, 2024, the Iran military suddenly launched a missile attack on Israel, which attracted global attention. After reading the attached content, it is not difficult to see that there is a complex political game behind this. The Putin government's involvement seems to have given Khamenei the determination to strike a final blow. This seemingly sudden confrontation is actually the result of a long-standing geopolitical wrangling. Let's explore the underlying reasons and possible implications behind this.
Section 1: The fuse for the escalation of contradictions
The confrontation between Iran and Israel did not happen overnight. Long ago, the two countries were drawn into hostilities due to ideological and geopolitical factors. However, the recent sharp deterioration of events is clearly not unrelated to Russia's involvement.
According to the annex, the October 1 missile attack by the Iran military against Israel appears to be the result of Khamenei's determination. Previously, he had been criticized for failing to take action. It wasn't until Russia Prime Minister Mishustin visited Tehran that Khamenei finally made up his mind to act. It can be seen that Russia's instruction and support have become a key factor in Khamenei's military action.
Section 2: Positions and demands of the parties
Judging from the annex, Russia, Iran and Israel have their own goals and considerations in this conflict.
Russia clearly hopes to use this incident to expand its influence in the Middle East. Putin does not want to see Iran compromise with the West, but hopes that it can "harden" to confront the United States and the West. To this end, Russia has provided intelligence support, military assistance and political support to Iran. This has undoubtedly greatly strengthened Khamenei's resolve.
Iran, for its part, has long maintained a confrontational posture with Israel. Khamenei is under pressure from public opinion at home and abroad, and urgently needs to maintain his deterrence and prestige through some kind of practical action. After gaining the support of Russia, he finally made up his mind to retaliate.
Israel, as Iran's old enemy, has been on high alert. The Mossad intelligence agency's assassination of Iran sparked Khamenei's anger. This missile attack by Iran has undoubtedly once again intensified the confrontation between the two countries.
It can be said that behind this conflict is the struggle of interests of the three regional powers of Russia, Iran and Israel. Putin's attempt to expand his influence has become a key factor in the escalation.
Section 3: Historical Origins and Cultural Differences
On the surface, this is just a military confrontation between Iran and Israel. But from a historical and cultural point of view, it stems from deep-seated ideological differences between the two countries.
Iran, as a Shiite Islamic power, has long viewed Israel as "Satan" and "unbelievers." Israel, on the other hand, stands for Zionism and Western values, incompatible with Islamic conservatism in Iran. There is a deep cultural estrangement and ideological opposition between the two countries.
Historically, the two countries have repeatedly engaged in military conflicts and political confrontations. After the Islamic Revolution in Iran in 1979, hatred of Israel became the basic position of Iran's official. Since then, the two sides have waged proxy wars in Lebanon, Gaza and other regions, and relations have continued to deteriorate.
Against this background, Russia's involvement has undoubtedly exacerbated the escalation of contradictions between the two countries. Putin's attempt to counter United States' influence in the Middle East by supporting Iran has undoubtedly fueled Iran's confrontational mentality. In this way, cultural and ideological differences, in turn, are magnified by geopolitical entanglements, which eventually lead to the latest round of military confrontation.
Section 4 Possible Impacts and Future Directions
Iran's missile attack on Israel undoubtedly marks a new crisis in relations between the two countries. The occurrence of this incident may have the following impacts:
First, in terms of the regional security landscape, such military action would undoubtedly trigger a strong counterattack from Israel and even lead to the outbreak of a full-scale war between the two countries. This will seriously shake the geopolitical balance in the Middle East and could trigger broader regional conflicts.
Second, at the level of diplomatic games, the involvement of Russia will undoubtedly deepen the confrontation between United States and Iran. United States is likely to further increase sanctions pressure on Iran, while Russia will provide diplomatic and military support to Iran, intensifying the game between the two powers in the Middle East.
In addition, the conflict could have an impact on the global energy landscape and trade order. The Middle East is an important energy supply center in the world, and once the situation deteriorates, the sharp fluctuations in energy prices will have a serious impact on the world economy.
In short, Iran's military action against Israel has undoubtedly triggered a new Middle East crisis. This not only reflects the antagonism between cultures and ideologies, but also reflects the fierce confrontation between the geopolitical wrestling of major powers. The future development trend remains to be further verified by time.
Epilogue:
In general, this missile attack on Israel by Iran implies a complex geopolitical game and ideological confrontation. Russia's involvement has become a key factor in the escalation. How to resolve the contradictions between the two countries and curb the deterioration of the situation will be the challenges that need to be faced in the future. It is also worth paying attention to historical, cultural, economic and other factors when observing and analyzing, so as to better grasp the deep-seated connotation of the event. We must also maintain an objective and rational attitude and avoid being dominated by perceptual understanding. Only in this way can we contribute to future peace and stability in the Middle East.
The original intention of this article is to spread positive energy, and there is no intention to infringe on the rights and interests of others. If there is any infringement, please contact us and we will actively cooperate with the handling.