laitimes

How likely is it that a boy who can't get into high school will fight back?

Many boys' parents are resistant to the diversion of the high school entrance examination, because it may limit their family's potential stocks, children are playful, love to play games must be smart, but they don't use this kind of intelligence for learning, and see other boys in high school counterattack, and girls lack stamina Some cases to substitute.

There is an essential difference between the boys who counterattack and the boys who are just greedy for play and do not learn, the former is because they feel that the difficulty of junior high school is too low, and they do not work hard because they have spare time to learn, and the same situation also happens to girls who have spare time to learn, but they are not as energetic as boys, showing a quiet side, and children who are greedy for play and do not learn, but because they are not interested in learning, the essence is unwilling to think, and they love to play games in addition to proving that their self-control is weak, which is not an advantage.

How likely is it that a boy who can't get into high school will fight back?

The decline in grades from junior high school to high school is much higher than the high probability event of the rise, the rise and fall are related to the rank, not the difficulty, the key high schools are the top performers in the class of the year, these people are reordered in a class, most of the grades will decline, and the rise is very few.

According to the analysis of the 20% book rate, this 20% is not only based on the high school entrance examination stream, but also the influence of single tricks and art students and sports students, and the proportion of students who can take a liberal arts subject is less than 10% among their peers.

Specific to each school, the first rate of the head high school can reach more than 90-95%, or even 100%, the average key high school can reach 50-70%, and the ordinary high school may only be 1%, even if 1% is already an obvious optimistic estimate, an ordinary high school with six or seven hundred students, it is difficult to produce six or seven children, and even a line is very difficult.

After the popularization of high school, those children who are shunted will not reach this only 1% chance, but will have to be lowered by several orders of magnitude.

How likely is it that a boy who can't get into high school will fight back?

Even if there is a small number of students who can go online in ordinary high schools, it is still unequal for each student, and there is also a gap in the level of students in ordinary high schools, most of whom are students with excellent admission results, which are not much different from the level of key high schools, and even higher than some index students. Even the most optimistic estimate is that the students with low admission scores will not be higher than 10%, that is, those students with low admission scores have only a 0.1% chance of getting on the first line.

In the next dimension, these students who have crossed the line in ordinary high schools are significantly higher than the students in the bottom 50%, and the probability of these students going to the first line is lower than this 0.1%. For the sake of this 1 in 1,000 (the most conservative estimate) probability of possible potential stocks (i.e., a book of wipes), it is not necessary to popularize high school.

How likely is it that a boy who can't get into high school will fight back?