laitimes

Embezzlement of 3 billion? This corrupt official used the treasury as his own? Ordinary people have to work for 50,000 years!

Corruption is a serious social disease, which not only harms the interests of the country and the people, but also distorts social fairness and justice. Recently, a case involving huge amounts of corruption and bribery has aroused great public concern, and the defendant Li Jianping was sentenced to death for embezzlement, bribery, and embezzlement of public funds totaling 3 billion yuan, and such a punishment can be said to be quite large.

What is surprising is that Li Jianping's attitude in court is very relaxed, and even shows contempt for the law, such behavior is undoubtedly "disturbing" in front of public opinion, and also makes people speculate about his true thoughts.

Embezzlement of 3 billion? This corrupt official used the treasury as his own? Ordinary people have to work for 50,000 years!

1. The beginning and end of the case

Li Jianping was sentenced to death for embezzlement, bribery, and embezzlement of public funds totaling 3 billion yuan

It is understood that Li Jianping used to be an official who held an important position, but during his tenure in public office, he used the power in his hands to carry out various illegal and criminal activities, including embezzlement of state-owned assets, accepting huge bribes, and embezzlement of public funds, and the amount involved was as high as 3 billion, which can be said to be an astronomical amount. Calculate that it should take 50,000 years for ordinary people to work!

Embezzlement of 3 billion? This corrupt official used the treasury as his own? Ordinary people have to work for 50,000 years!

In view of the facts of Li Jianping's crime, the court finally imposed a rather severe punishment and directly sentenced him to death, and also clearly pointed out in the verdict that Li Jianping's crime was very serious, and his behavior had constituted the crimes of embezzlement, bribery, and embezzlement of public funds, and the amount of money was particularly huge, and the verdict was unanimously recognized by the broad masses of the people.

Embezzlement of 3 billion? This corrupt official used the treasury as his own? Ordinary people have to work for 50,000 years!

Second, Li Jianping coped with it easily

In the face of the death sentence, Li Jianping did not care

Generally speaking, for a person, when he can face the death sentence, his feelings must be very heavy and contradictory, after all, this is no longer a simple issue of criminal responsibility, but a major matter involving life and death.

Embezzlement of 3 billion? This corrupt official used the treasury as his own? Ordinary people have to work for 50,000 years!

However, Li Jianping appeared in the court with a very relaxed attitude, and after listening to his verdict, his expression was still very calm, as if he had a great understanding of death, and this attitude also surprised everyone present.

What is even more unacceptable is that Li Jianping also openly stated in court that he did not care about such a verdict, because he did not believe that a major event of life and death would befall him.

Embezzlement of 3 billion? This corrupt official used the treasury as his own? Ordinary people have to work for 50,000 years!

Third, the social repercussions are strong

Regarding Li Jianping's attitude, netizens expressed their anger

In the face of Li Jianping's "maverick" attitude, I believe that everyone's hearts will have great indignation against him, after all, at such a special moment, as a party, he should have a different emotional experience, rather than blindly "pretending to be calm". Netizens were angry: It's not enough for this kind of person to kill him 10,000 times.

Embezzlement of 3 billion? This corrupt official used the treasury as his own? Ordinary people have to work for 50,000 years!

4. The court upheld the death sentence

Embezzlement of 3 billion? This corrupt official used the treasury as his own? Ordinary people have to work for 50,000 years!

The law is not soft on corrupt officials

In the face of such public pressure, the Inner Mongolia High Court also responded to the matter, saying that it had carefully reviewed the entire case, and fully considered the opinions and demands of all parties, and finally firmly upheld the death sentence of Li Jianping.

Embezzlement of 3 billion? This corrupt official used the treasury as his own? Ordinary people have to work for 50,000 years!

Under such circumstances, the court also emphasized that no matter what the reason, the law will not be soft on corrupt officials, and only by assuming due legal responsibility can it arouse sufficient vigilance and give others a great deterrent.

Fifth, the struggle against corruption has a long way to go

The participation of the whole people is needed

Through the exposure of such a case, I believe that everyone should have a deeper understanding of the problem of corruption and understand the various harms contained in it.

Embezzlement of 3 billion? This corrupt official used the treasury as his own? Ordinary people have to work for 50,000 years!

In order to fundamentally solve such problems, it is not enough to rely on the punishment of the judiciary, but also requires all sectors of society to actively participate in the fight against corruption and form a strong joint force to jointly monitor the words and deeds of officials and ensure that their power is not abused.

It is also necessary to establish a tighter supervision mechanism so that those who are lucky enough to have nowhere to escape, and we should also step up the prevention of corruption, so that the occurrence of all kinds of illegal and criminal acts can be effectively curbed from the institutional point of view.

Embezzlement of 3 billion? This corrupt official used the treasury as his own? Ordinary people have to work for 50,000 years!

We should also make full use of the embezzled funds that have been recovered and use them in the construction of social welfare undertakings and public undertakings, so that these "dirty money" can truly make some substantial contributions to social development and bring more benefits and benefits to the general public.

At last

What do you think about this? Leave a comment and exchange!

Read on