The first matchup between Trump and Harris ended in Philadelphia, and both of them were satisfied with the result, which seemed to be evenly matched, but in fact, the winner was already divided from the content of the matchup, but can the "winner" Harris have the last laugh? At the critical moment, Trump has once again presented the "anti-China card", what is the intention of pulling China?
This debate competition, which is called "the battle between prosecutors and felons" by the US media, directly reflects the specific situation of the current election, and it can be seen from Trump's many "defenses" that the Republican Party is in a weak position, and after the debate, former United States President Obama directly said that "Harris will become the president of all United States." Such a high-profile stance at least proves that the Democrats are working together to go all out, but the Republican Party does not seem to have fully endorsed Trump, and there is still a hearing on Trump to defend in November, leaving little time for him to fight back.
In this United States presidential election, abortion rights and tariffs are two major events, the former has little to do with us, and the latter is divided into internal and external taxes, let's analyze them one by one. In terms of internal tax adjustments, Harris has reversed Biden's radical measures and significantly reduced the tax rate for financial tax reform, while focusing on the protection of small and medium-sized enterprises. Trump has focused tax issues on foreign issues, such as tightening tariffs on Chinese goods, and previously clamoring for tariffs on all imports from China to more than 60%. It can be seen that Trump wants to continue to play the "hole card" of the Sino-US trade war to stabilize the vote base, but is this trick still good?
On the one hand, on the issue of China, the attitude of the Democratic Party is not weaker than that of Trump, and just a few days ago United States the provisions of the Section 301 tariffs were applied and the technical blockade of Chinese semiconductors was tightened. On the road of trade protectionism, the two parties can be said to be like-minded, and they have long been politically correct in United States. This trick worked eight years ago, but now it has little practical effect and will backfire. On the other hand, aggressive tariffs on China could lead to a bottoming out of inflation and deep damage to allies. This may not be in line with most people's definition of a "United States dream", and a United States isolated from the world will not make people feel high, but will become the target of public criticism, which is the truth that some people have realized during the four years of the Trump administration.
In addition, on regional conflicts such as Russia and Ukraine, Palestine and Israel, Trump's proposition is not in the interests of United States and most of its allies. On the Russian-Ukrainian issue, he called for a ceasefire, and unconditionally supported Israel on the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. This is clearly in opposition to the "countries of the South" in Europe and the world, further infuriating the resistance of the majority of the people in the United States. In the coming months, a large-scale failure of the Ukrainian counteroffensive or a serious humanitarian crisis in the Gaza Strip will be bad for Trump's election and conversely Harris's troubles. At present, these are the two most variable issues, and United States cannot be directly controlled, after all, it would be good if Putin did not stumble, and Netanyahu should do more political tasks that are beneficial to himself, who will look at the eyes of United States election?
For us, it is good to wait and see what happens in the United States presidential election, because no matter who comes to power, China and the United States will not return to the "honeymoon period" of the past, nor will a large-scale war be ushered in immediately. From a historical perspective, China and the United States seem to be in the era of the world's handover to the Axis powers, but unlike previous wars, the two sides seem to have tacitly adopted the method of "the king does not see the king". As long as the most direct confrontation between the two countries can be avoided, all that remains is to defend the water and cover the earth, and victory will always be on the side that conforms to the trend of the world.