“
It is necessary to introduce churning traffic into the pool of the rule of law and prevent them from "dying in a disease".
”
Text丨 and return
In the past few days, the incident of "tearing each other" between the network anchor Simba and the three sheep team has continued to attract attention. At the beginning, the two sides had disagreements over the price mechanism of the live broadcast of hairy crabs, and Simba said in the live broadcast that he was reported by Xiao Yang's team when selling hairy crabs, and accused Xiao Yang's team of having problems in quality inspection, after-sales, and compensation attitude; Then Simba pointed out that the other party had "guided" and "criminalized" behavior in the case of a female anchor......
Simba and Brother Xiao Yang are both top e-commerce and super anchors, and the disputes and quarrels between the two sides have developed to the point where they have developed in the field of public opinion, and they can no longer be simply regarded as "melons" one after another, but a very serious legal issue.
Specifically, on the one hand, Simba claimed to have been reported by Brother Xiao Yang's team, and on the other side, Simba warned Lu Wenqing, the founder of the Three Sheep Group, that the case of a female anchor had a chance to be overturned, "Is it your lawyer and you, as well as Brother Xiao Yang, that you guide others?" It's a crime! And bluntly said that he was legally responsible for every word he said. So, what is the nature of the alleged acts of both parties?
If there is a real violation, the corresponding regulatory authorities should intervene in a timely manner, initiate the necessary investigation procedures, find out the matter, and hold the responsibility in place.
In particular, the sentence "this is a crime" is already a very clear accusation, if what Simba said is true, "this is a crime" should be concerned and intervened by the relevant departments; If it is created out of nothing, it may constitute rumors or even slander, and it is also necessary to bear corresponding legal responsibility. In other words, there is only one truth, and someone has to pay for it.
Both Internet celebrity anchors and ordinary netizens must understand that there are not only hot searches and traffic on the Internet, but also legal red lines that exist although they are invisible. Since some things may already be suspected of violating the law and committing crimes, it is not something that can be easily ended by "making a big fuss and quietly leaving".
The live broadcast room is also a public space, and the public opinion field is also a social instrument. Everyone can use them to express their legitimate demands, assert their legitimate rights and interests, and also need to be responsible for their words and deeds. Especially an Internet celebrity with such a large number of fans, since he has chosen to openly accuse each other and accuse, he must respect the public nature of cyberspace and the seriousness of the law.
The public opinion field cannot become a tool for anchors to "fight online". Recently, the responses of both sides have come and gone, full of gunpowder, and related hot searches are also on one after another. But many netizens were confused and didn't fully understand what the two sides were arguing about, or what they were "frying"; Many netizens said that they were annoyed by these hot searches - even if they didn't want to see it, they were frequently pushed to their eyes.
In recent years, there have been many hot topics like this kind of "network pinching". In the end, some of them will be reduced to chicken feathers and will not be able to do it, and both sides have earned enough traffic, leaving the network with a miasma of smoke and unbearable for netizens. These inexplicable traffic is always flowing wantonly, which not only interferes with the normal network order, but also directly affects the public's Internet experience. This is contrary to the goal of clear and orderly cyber governance.
Therefore, it is necessary to introduce churning traffic into the pool of the rule of law and prevent them from "dying in a disease". Only by letting the law be lawed can speakers truly have a sense of awe in cyberspace and restrain their words and deeds. How to stop the "Xinyang dispute" that has been making trouble for several days? Let's end it with the law.
Editor|Wang Lei
Typesetting|Gan Qiongfang
The Paper Commentary's exclusive manuscript shall not be reproduced without authorization