The dispute between the International Olympic Committee (IOC) and the International Boxing Federation (IBA) is no longer just a storm in the world of sport.
In June last year, the IOC decided to revoke the recognition of IBA, mainly because IBA failed to make the necessary changes in governance and finances.
This decision not only puts the IBA under tremendous pressure, but also makes the future of boxing an uncertain sport.
Right now, the future of boxing hangs in the balance at Los Angeles 2028.
The International Olympic Committee (IOC) has been clear: if boxing is to continue at the Olympics, a new global governing body will have to take over the sport.
The existing International Boxing Federation (IBA) is clearly no longer in order, and although the "World Boxing" has emerged, it currently has only 37 national boxing associations joining, which is clearly not enough, resulting in the IOC not recognizing the new organization.
The feud culminated during the Paris Olympics.
In particular, the gender issues of two fighters, Lin Yuting of Chinese Taipei and Kelif of Algeria, have attracted huge attention.
The two fighters were disqualified from the World Championships due to gender controversy, and as a result, during the Paris Olympics, the IBA tried to explain the storm through a press conference.
Unfortunately, IBA's response was more of a conference of accusations about the IOC, lacking strong evidence to support their interpretation.
Journalists were not convinced, criticizing IBA for wasting everyone's time and failing to solve problems effectively.
Against this backdrop, the future of boxing is becoming increasingly uncertain.
The IOC has clear requirements for the future of boxing, and the current management system and emerging organizations are failing to meet their standards.
This has filled all parties in the boxing world with anxiety and unease.
On the one hand, they wanted to find an institution that could maintain the fairness and impartiality of the movement and manage it effectively. On the other hand, they have to face the current situation full of controversy and uncertainty.
Boxing athletes are also feeling helpless, and their careers and future developments have been affected by these management issues.
Athletes who had hoped to shine at the Olympics are now faced with policy confusion and management loopholes.
Their efforts and sweat, as if in an unstable environment, become less meaningful.
The media response to this series of events has also been cynical, with everyone focusing on these high-level decisions and disputes within the organization, but paying little attention to the athletes who are actually affected.
IBA's explanation would have been seen as a failed PR exercise, and the criticism they faced would not have had a positive impact on the future.
This fight about boxing is not just a showdown between organizations, but a test for athletes and the sport as a whole.
Everyone is waiting for a clear solution and boxing can find a stable path forward.
In the current situation, both the IOC and the IBA need to think seriously and adjust in order to really give boxing a clear future direction.
Some netizens put forward their opinions on the reaction of the girls when they encountered injustice in the game.
They said that if the girls chose to play in the current situation, they would only suffer a beating, and the gold medal seemed to be out of reach.
They believe that it is better to directly refuse to play and fight, and use this way to express their dissatisfaction and fight for their rights.
The sentiment behind these words is not difficult to understand.
In many competitions, especially when rules and fairness are questioned, athletes face not only physical challenges, but also mental suffering.
If unfair treatment on the field becomes the norm, then an athlete's efforts can become meaningless.
The sweat and toil of competing for the gold medal seems to be consumed by these rules and management problems.
For these girls, choosing to play in the face of injustice can sometimes be like giving their efforts to an unworthy goal.
They have to endure unequal treatment on the field and at the end of the day they don't get the accolades they deserve.
In this case, the suggestions of netizens seem a bit radical, but they also reflect the true thoughts of some people.
They felt that instead of continuing to work hard in such an environment, they should choose to refuse the game and use this way to pressure the management to be treated fairerly.
This type of commentary, while seemingly extreme, reflects many people's dissatisfaction with the status quo and their desire for change.
Athletes are not only on the field for gold medals, but also for showing their strength and pursuing fairness.
Abandoning the competition can be a strong expression in the face of unfair handling and management, and although it also means giving up the chance to win a gold medal, it may attract more attention and thus push the problem to be resolved.
Imagine if these athletes did choose not to compete, it would not only have an impact on the event itself, but also spark a discussion about the issue.
There will likely be more media attention, more discussion and debate, which will eventually push the relevant bodies to re-examine existing rules and management methods.
For athletes, this struggle may be more important than winning a gold medal because it is about fairness, justice and dignity.
Everyone reacts differently to injustice.
Some choose to endure, while others may speak out by fighting.
It's an extreme way for athletes to choose to refuse to compete, but in some cases, it may be the only avenue to get attention and change.
Behind this is the desire for fairness and justice and the dissatisfaction with the status quo, hoping to promote the solution of the problem in this way.
In a recent interview, IOC spokesman Adams spoke about the current state of boxing.
His statement was straightforward, pointing out that the current management model is no longer suitable for the normal operation of the sport.
He said that the chaos facing the sport of boxing must be changed, and that it can only be truly solved by finding a completely new governing body.
Adams' point is clear.
He believes that the existing management model cannot guarantee the healthy development of boxing.
In fact, this statement reveals a deep sense of frustration.
In the face of a chaotic management system and frequent controversies, the future of boxing as a sport looks even more ambiguous.
There was a sense of urgency in Adams' speech, knowing that it was no longer possible to rely on existing institutions to ensure the fairness and effectiveness of the competition.
This not only affects the performance of the athletes, but also has a direct bearing on the overall image of the sport.
As a spokesman, Adams understands that the chaos in boxing is not just a management issue, but also a threat to fair play for athletes.
The athletes have put in hard training and countless sweats, and should have shown their strength in a fair and just environment.
However, the current management model makes these efforts seem futile.
Adams' statement showed his dissatisfaction with the current management system, while also expressing concern about the future of boxing.
Adams mentioned that if boxing is to continue to be held at the Los Angeles Olympics, it will have to find a more reliable governing body.
In fact, these words imply dissatisfaction with the status quo and expectations for the future.
He knows that with the current institutions alone, boxing will not only be difficult to restore order, but may also descend further into chaos.
Finding a new governing body is not just a simple matter of substitution, but a crucial step in solving the problems that have accumulated over a long period of time.
Athletes and boxing enthusiasts may have some expectation and hope in their hearts when they hear these words.
They want to see a fair playing environment and a governing body that can really stand up for their rights.
In the current situation, this expectation is even stronger.
Athletes deserve to be rewarded and respected for their hard work and dedication.
If the existing management system does not address these issues, their hopes will become increasingly slim.
At the moment, the IOC has made its attitude clear on how to deal with the future of boxing as a sport.
The next Olympics will no longer rely on the IBA, which will undoubtedly put more pressure on the IBA and make the future of boxing a sport uncertain.
Attention to this decision continues to grow in the sports world, and how it develops in the future will have a direct impact on the global layout of boxing.
The whole incident is not just a confrontation between the two organizations, but also about the future direction of the ancient sport of boxing.
Regardless of the outcome, athletes, fans and major boxing associations are watching the change in the hope that the game will be reinvigorated under the new management structure.
Welcome to leave your valuable comments and opinions in the comment area, and look forward to discussing with you.
Note: It is not easy to be original, plagiarism and manuscript washing, and it will be studied deeply. The picture comes from the Internet, if there is any infringement, please contact to delete