Xu Zheng is an amazing person, I hate him very much, I think he is too shrewd, but he is too capable, almost every work is excellent, whether he is a director or an actor, he can always present the best. I don't like him, but I watch every one of his movies, and I still watch no man's land and the god of medicine.
Maybe he is just very real, others are good at disguising and whitewashing themselves, those directors and actors, the things they shoot are also very good-looking, with content, depth and box office, but what they do behind their backs will not be made public (this is very critical), they will only be worse than Xu Zheng.
All actors and directors are a character in front of the public, Xu Zheng was just exposed, I have been focusing on the work itself, never caring about their character and life, their characters are far less exciting than their works.
Regardless of the deeds, it's like I'm not the god of medicine, and in the end, it even affected the medical insurance reform. If there are good film and television works that can arouse the society's attention to people's livelihood security and promote some changes, how can it not be a good thing for people who get benefits. Regardless of where this good thing began, it happened to him, and it was better than not happening.
As a director, I think he has beaten many big directors in China, and as an actor, his acting skills are impeccable...... The ability is too strong for this person......
I understand customers, so I like his work.
understands the market, so the box office is high.
understands the management side, so I look at the hate of the shrewd slippery head.
Human nature is complex. Many actors' acting skills are very good, and there are documentaries that capture the director watching tears at the scene, but it does not affect the questioning of them outside the play. Even if Yu Zheng talked about Li Meng, it also made me praise him for the first time. Judging a person only by good or bad is not suitable for adults.
It's too double-standard, the movie was originally aimed at social issues, but in the eyes of those people, it became a poor man's money, how unsatisfactory it was.
If this film is filmed by Korea or United States, it will have depth, expose social reality, Niu B, change the country to shoot it and feel that it is a joke for rich people to play the bottom people, watch a movie, pay more attention to the work itself, the actors have money, and I haven't seen you boycott watching variety shows, pretending to be serious people.
In this way, the parasite is the cosplay of the rich, and the Dallas Buyers Club is also garbage. The falling trial heroine didn't have a dead husband, so why did she play a woman who killed her husband. All film and television dramas that reflect the lives of people at the bottom can be regarded as shows, and they can only shoot domineering presidents. I never expected that people would look at movies with the thinking that "actors playing poor people are cutting leeks".
It's unlikely, I wasn't the god of medicine that he filmed before, and it was because the case was already over that he filmed. In our country, we have never changed a law because of a movie like Pixel.
The bottom must always be seen, and there is no discussion about where the improvement comes from.
I don't understand the logic of some people. Social problems need to be discussed, the movie can reflect it, be seen by more people from other classes, and these people who see it are the ones who solve the problem. It's not for them per se. But there will always be some impact when social themes are filmed, such as the melting pot in Korea, is it filmed for children who have been violated?
If you want to watch a live-action performance, you can consider making a documentary or a documentary movie, and then you can't do news documentaries, the director team follows the whole process is the most real. But it's hard to say whether it can be released as a theatrical movie.