If you think it's good, just click "Follow".
Copywriting丨
Edit丨
Fighting raged between Tufa and Rafah in the Gaza Strip, with 300,000 IDF and 30,000 Hamas fighters battling it out.
Rafa has been a battleground for soldiers since ancient times, and now every inch of land has become the focus of the battlefield.
Israeli special forces and Hamas snipers had a fierce confrontation and the battle was fierce.
Israel's large-scale use of AI warfare systems has resulted in casualties among innocent civilians despite improving efficiency.
The war took a heavy toll on both sides and devastated the economy.
The war in Gaza has been going on for almost eight months, and the Israeli army, despite its military might, has to admit that it cannot completely eliminate the stubborn Hamas.
In this long conflict, 120 hostages were still not rescued, and their fate hung in the balance, which became a sore point in this war.
Israeli military spokesman Hagari said in a recent interview that Hamas is not just a military organization, but also a deeply rooted ideology and partisanship.
This makes it difficult to eradicate it by military action alone, which is fundamentally in conflict with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's original intention of eliminating Hamas.
Netanyahu expressed dissatisfaction with the progress of the military, which appears to be subservient to political leadership but incapable of acting in practice, and a "tactical pause" has become an option.
The divide between politics and the military is not limited to strategic objectives.
In politics, Netanyahu's hard-line approach to hijacking the coalition government and refusing to consider other alternatives has led to the exit of politicians such as Benny Gantz.
This disagreement not only caused shocks in the wartime cabinet, but also reflected the deep-seated contradictions in the Israeli government's military-government relations.
As time went on, the goal of eliminating Hamas became increasingly elusive.
Although the Security Council did not call a direct halt to the war, Israel has felt the difficulty of continuing the war.
Netanyahu, while ready to reach some kind of "partial agreement" on the hostage issue, has refused to accept a permanent ceasefire and has tried to take military control over Gaza.
The lack of a clear timetable for this plan makes the situation even more confusing.
As a result, Hamas insisted that Israel fully withdraw its troops from Gaza and reach a permanent ceasefire agreement before all hostages were released.
This condition was firmly rejected by the Israeli side, and the two sides reached a stalemate on the issue.
On the other side of the war, the exchange of fire between Allah and Israeli forces on the Lebanese border further complicates the situation.
Allah launched massive rocket and drone attacks after its senior commander was killed, demonstrating its powerful intelligence and strike capabilities.
The incident not only exacerbated tensions in the region, but also forced the Israeli military to consider shifting the front to Lebanon.
With the Israeli military approving the battle plan for Lebanon, and the defense secretary even traveling to the United States to discuss related actions, the entire Middle East region is shrouded in the shadow of war.
Allah leaders are cautious about this, they do not want the outbreak of all-out war.
In this complex strategic situation, Israel faces a huge dilemma.
On the one hand, the armed forces of Hamas and Allah cannot be underestimated in terms of quantity and quality, especially since Allah has been tempered in the Syrian civil war, and its combat mode is no longer a simple guerrilla war.
On the other hand, Israel's own strategic and economic centers are under great threat, and the possibility of fighting on two fronts makes the situation even more dangerous.
From a historical point of view, Israel has been faced with the dilemma of fighting on two fronts.
Its spiritual centre, Jerusalem, its economic and political centre, the north, and its important agricultural region, the Sea of Galilee, are its indispensable territories.
Against this background, Israel's military strategy often requires taking into account threats in several directions at once.
Unlike the historical German army, the Israeli army now faces a more complex situation.
The ideological and political positions of Hamas and Allah make it difficult for them to be completely eliminated.
The possible involvement of external forces such as Iran also makes the situation even more unpredictable.
Against this background, the strategic goal of "ending war with war" is becoming more and more difficult to achieve.
The Arab world has regained confidence in Hamas's raids, and the possibility of a negotiated solution in Israel has disappeared.
Most regions believe that a two-state solution is the only way to solve this problem, but Netanyahu's government has ruled out this option by planning to make West Bank settlements permanent.
The conflict between Israel and the Arab states has gone beyond a mere military confrontation to a duel of national wills.
Hamas and Allah, as ideological and political organizations, are invincible in this war.
The Israeli army has recognized that they cannot be eliminated by military means, and that contradictions cannot be resolved by political means.
This makes it difficult for Israel to achieve its goal of "no war" through war, and fighting on two fronts may even become a "forever war", which is unbearable for Israel, and even the United States may not be able to solve this problem.
The war in Gaza has been going on for almost eight months, and the Israeli army, despite its military might, has to admit that it cannot completely eliminate the stubborn Hamas.
In this long conflict, 120 hostages were still not rescued, and their fate hung in the balance, which became a sore point in this war.
Israeli military spokesman Hagari said in a recent interview that Hamas is not just a military organization, but also a deeply rooted ideology and partisanship.
This makes it difficult to eradicate it by military action alone, which is fundamentally in conflict with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's original intention of eliminating Hamas.
Netanyahu expressed dissatisfaction with the progress of the military, which appears to be subservient to political leadership but incapable of acting in practice, and a "tactical pause" has become an option.
The divide between politics and the military is not limited to strategic objectives.
In politics, Netanyahu's hard-line approach to hijacking the coalition government and refusing to consider other alternatives has led to the exit of politicians such as Benny Gantz.
This disagreement not only caused shocks in the wartime cabinet, but also reflected the deep-seated contradictions in the Israeli government's military-government relations.
As time went on, the goal of eliminating Hamas became increasingly elusive.
Although the Security Council did not call a direct halt to the war, Israel has felt the difficulty of continuing the war.
Netanyahu, while ready to reach some kind of "partial agreement" on the hostage issue, has refused to accept a permanent ceasefire and has tried to take military control over Gaza.
The lack of a clear timetable for this plan makes the situation even more confusing.
As a result, Hamas insisted that Israel fully withdraw its troops from Gaza and reach a permanent ceasefire agreement before all hostages were released.
This condition was firmly rejected by the Israeli side, and the two sides reached a stalemate on the issue.
On the other side of the war, the exchange of fire between Allah and Israeli forces on the Lebanese border further complicates the situation.
Allah launched massive rocket and drone attacks after its senior commander was killed, demonstrating its powerful intelligence and strike capabilities.
The incident not only exacerbated tensions in the region, but also forced the Israeli military to consider shifting the front to Lebanon.
With the Israeli military approving the battle plan for Lebanon, and the defense secretary even traveling to the United States to discuss related actions, the entire Middle East region is shrouded in the shadow of war.
Allah leaders are cautious about this, they do not want the outbreak of all-out war.
In this complex strategic situation, Israel faces a huge dilemma.
On the one hand, the armed forces of Hamas and Allah cannot be underestimated in terms of quantity and quality, especially since Allah has been tempered in the Syrian civil war, and its combat mode is no longer a simple guerrilla war.
On the other hand, Israel's own strategic and economic centers are under great threat, and the possibility of fighting on two fronts makes the situation even more dangerous.
From a historical point of view, Israel has been faced with the dilemma of fighting on two fronts.
Its spiritual centre, Jerusalem, its economic and political centre, the north, and its important agricultural region, the Sea of Galilee, are its indispensable territories.
Against this background, Israel's military strategy often requires taking into account threats in several directions at once.
Unlike the historical German army, the Israeli army now faces a more complex situation.
The ideological and political positions of Hamas and Allah make it difficult for them to be completely eliminated.
The possible involvement of external forces such as Iran also makes the situation even more unpredictable.
Against this background, the strategic goal of "ending war with war" is becoming more and more difficult to achieve.
The Arab world has regained confidence in Hamas's raids, and the possibility of a negotiated solution in Israel has disappeared.
Most regions believe that a two-state solution is the only way to solve this problem, but Netanyahu's government has ruled out this option by planning to make West Bank settlements permanent.
The conflict between Israel and the Arab states has gone beyond a mere military confrontation to a duel of national wills.
Hamas and Allah, as ideological and political organizations, are invincible in this war.
The Israeli army has recognized that they cannot be eliminated by military means, and that contradictions cannot be resolved by political means.
This makes it difficult for Israel to achieve its goal of "no war" through war, and fighting on two fronts may even become a "forever war", which is unbearable for Israel, and even the United States may not be able to solve this problem.
(Disclaimer) The process and pictures described in the article are from the Internet, and this article aims to advocate positive social energy and no vulgar and other bad guidance. If it involves copyright or character infringement issues, please contact us in time, and we will delete the content as soon as possible! If there is any doubt about the incident, it will be deleted or changed immediately after contact.