Copywriting | odd
Edit | odd
"There are many rights and wrongs on the Internet, and everyone has different opinions."
Friends, Huang Yiming's real-name report by Li Yuchan This incident has aroused widespread discussion and attention.
After Huang Yiming revealed that his daughter Shanshan was born to Wang Sicong, he opened an account for Shanshan, and the traffic of the account was good.
It is alleged that Shining's physical features are reminiscent of Wang Jianlin, and although Wang Sicong has not moved his hukou, he seems to acquiesce and approve of Shining's relationship.
As soon as such an incident was exposed, it immediately sparked heated discussions on social media and the Internet.
Some questioned Mr. Huang's actions, arguing that he relied too much on and exploited his child's fame and background.
They point out that this behavior can have a negative impact on the child, making it seen in the public eye as a mere tool for fame and fortune.
In addition, there are concerns that such a practice may spark more controversy and discussion on a social and ethical level, especially when it comes to minors and their right to privacy.
There are also people who hold a different view, believing that Huang Yiming, as a father, has the right to protect and support his children, especially in a social environment with high information and media exposure.
They advocate that parents should create more opportunities and resources for their children's development, which can not only promote their children's personal growth, but also lay a stronger foundation for their future.
After Huang Yiming exposed his daughter Shanshan, Shining-related videos began to appear frequently, and she can also bring goods through videos, and it is said that she has obtained 110,000 advertising revenues.
Huang Yiming is not shy about this, but sometimes shows off these achievements.
Such exposure and ostentation have also caused some controversy and criticism.
Some believe that Huang Yiming is too commercial and uses his children's fame for profit, which may have a negative impact on the child's growth and psychological development, and has also sparked public discussion about family privacy and media exposure.
What's more prominent is that Huang Yiming was reported by Li Yuchan with his real name, accusing him of violating the advertising law and hyping his illegitimate daughter through his Douyin account, so as to gain traffic and receive advertisements.
Li Yuchan herself is a well-known anti-counterfeiting Internet celebrity, who once served as a host, and she is known for exposing the improper behavior of Internet celebrities and public figures.
Her whistleblowing has sparked widespread attention and discussion, with some supporting her actions as helping to clean up the online environment and protect consumer rights, while others questioned her motives and methods, believing that she may also be using these incidents to some extent to increase her visibility and influence.
On social media, there has been a heated discussion about the two figures.
Some people support Li Yuchan's behavior, believing that she is speaking out for justice and morality and maintaining normal social order; Others criticized her, believing that she might be too radical and extreme.
This opposition and controversy reflects the public's disagreement over how to deal with the complex balance between online credibility and personal privacy.
This incident is not only an exposure and criticism of an individual's behavior, but also a profound reflection on social morality, legal boundaries, and the supervision mechanism of online public opinion.
How to effectively manage and regulate information dissemination and personal behavior on the Internet under the premise of protecting personal privacy is one of the important issues that need to be solved urgently in the current society.
In the comments and discussions of netizens, there are different views and attitudes towards Li Yuchan's reporting behavior.
Some people believe that Li Yuchan's report is a voice for fairness and justice, and she has played a certain role in social supervision and public opinion guidance by exposing the misconduct of Internet celebrities and public figures.
These proponents believe that if illegal acts are not exposed and stopped, they will encourage unhealthy practices and damage the interests of consumers and the credibility of society.
Some people also questioned and criticized Li Yuchan's reporting behavior.
They believe that Li Yuchan may have taken advantage of it to some extent, using Internet celebrities and hot events to increase her popularity and attention.
At times, these critics point out, her reports seem more like traffic and hype than simply acting for social justice.
They believe that this kind of behavior may have an overly radical and one-sided side, and it is easy to cause unnecessary confrontation and controversy in the field of public opinion.
As for Li Yuchan's real motives, it is actually difficult to generalize.
As a former host and now an online anti-counterfeiter, her behavior is often based on the protection of consumer rights and social justice, but at the same time, it is inevitably affected by personal emotions, interests and attention.
In the current environment of highly developed social media, public opinion scrutiny and the establishment of personal branding are often intertwined, which makes people's judgment of her behavior more complex and diverse.
To evaluate whether Li Yuchan's behavior is acceptable, it is necessary to consider the specific case and the motivation behind her action.
On the premise of maintaining fairness and objectivity, society needs to be more rational and tolerant to ensure the balance between public opinion supervision and individual rights and interests, and to avoid unnecessary polarization and confrontation caused by individual incidents.